596540f864
* feat(#3227): publish machine-readable state contract at step boundaries Adds src/state-contract.cts, a best-effort publisher that writes .planning/state.json (contract 1.0.0) at 11 step-boundary commands, so external tools read a versioned contract instead of parsing STATE.md and ROADMAP.md heuristically. Composes existing owners rather than re-deriving: phase rows come from a new locateProgressTable extracted from deriveProgressFromRoadmap (so the snapshot can never disagree with GSD's own progress counters), milestone identity from getMilestoneInfo, and next from classifyProject. Owners are required lazily to avoid the state -> state-contract -> smart-entry -> state require cycle. Also fixes a pre-existing defect in scripts/lint-test-file-count.cjs (maintainer-approved as a second concern): testEffectivePrefix never stripped the suite qualifier, so 65 dotted test files counted against no module and 9 mis-bucketed into a shorter one. Allowlist re-baselined for the 74 files the gate can now see. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#3227): backfill PR number into the changeset fragment pr:0 -> pr:3824 now that the PR exists. Doc-only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#3227): shape hostile-name fixtures away from the scan corpus The two hostile-input fixtures used a literal phrase from scripts/prompt-injection-scan.sh's corpus, so CI's Security Scan redded on this file. These tests assert that an arbitrary phase name round-trips into state.json as inert data -- the property holds for any string, so the injection flavor is illustrative, not load-bearing. Reshaped to a hyphenated fake instruction tag, which stays hostile-looking while matching none of the scanner's patterns. Allowlisting the file was rejected: that mechanism is for suites whose subject IS injection defense, and it would blind the scanner to this whole file permanently. See DEFECT.PROMPT-INJECTION-SCAN-COLLISION. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#3227): ratchet the state-contract mutation floor to its measured score The module was registered at minScore 50, the ratchet's minimum permitted floor for a newly-registered module whose score had not been measured. This PR's own Stryker shard measured 66.25% (run 32769289750, job 97565813640), so the floor moves to floor(measured) - 1 = 65, per the rule the registry documents. 66.25 is below TARGET_MUTATION_SCORE (80), so this stays a ratchet candidate: raise as the tests improve, never lower. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GSD Core
Git. Ship. Done.
English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
What is GSD Core
GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.
How it works
Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:
- Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
- Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
- Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
- Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
- Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one
Quickstart
npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.
On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.
Once installed, start a new project or onboard an existing repo:
/gsd-new-project # greenfield project
/gsd-onboard # existing codebase
New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase, or Onboarding an existing codebase for brownfield setup.
Documentation
What's new in 1.7.0 → docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md
Tutorials — learning by doing:
How-to guides — task-focused recipes:
Reference — authoritative facts:
Explanation — concepts and design decisions:
Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.
Why it works
Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.
Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.
Community
| Project | Platform |
|---|---|
| gsd-opencode | Original OpenCode port |
| Discord | Community support |
Star History
License
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.