a5706bd39d
* test(#2596): failing-first suite for worktree-wave scope conformance Binds the advisory diff-vs-declared-scope check to behavior before it exists: the pure coverage predicate, the SUMMARY-artifact exemption and its parity with the rescue walker, the gauntlet integration (never flips ok, degrades on a git failure, survives a later block), the manifest normalizer's files_modified handling, and the --files negative-input matrix on record-agent/create. Refs #2596 * enhance(#2596): warn when a wave branch commits outside its declared scope The worktree-wave merge gauntlet validated branch, base, deletions, SUMMARY rescue and a clean worktree, but never compared a plan branch's actual committed diff against the files_modified the plan declared — so an executor that committed outside its brief merged into shared phase state silently. Adds an advisory scope-conformance check: when the manifest entry carries a declared scope, the gauntlet diffs HEAD...<branch> and appends one structured warning per path outside it. It never flips ok and never blocks the merge; promotion to a hard gate is a separate, disclosed change. With no declared scope no git subprocess is spent at all. Refs #2596 * docs(#2596): document the advisory worktree-wave scope-conformance check Records the optional --files flag on worktree record-agent/create, the advisory warnings channel cleanup-wave now emits, and its two deliberate noise limits (SUMMARY-artifact exemption, literal-prefix glob matching). Wires execute-phase to pass the plan's already-parsed PLAN_FILES. Refs #2596 * fix(#2596): close review findings on the scope-conformance advisory - share one path normalizer between the SUMMARY-artifact predicate and the scope comparison so the exemption and the check cannot drift - wire --files into the orchestrator-worktree dispatch, which created a worktree but never declared its scope, so the advisory silently did not apply on that backend; ADR-1239 requires both adapters share one check - correct the now-false blockquote claiming the check does not exist yet - add the fast-check property tests the repo requires for parser logic - add the record-agent/create parity test that Generative Fix Divergence requires for two surfaces implementing one rule Refs #2596 * fix(#2596): keep execute-phase.md under the frozen pre-phase-6 byte ceiling The one-sentence note added with the --files flag pushed execute-phase.md to 93708 bytes, past the ADR-857 PRE_PHASE6 cap of 93600 — the tightest of the three workflow size gates, and a hard cap an acknowledgment cannot clear. It failed three tests plus the differential attribution check. Condense the note to a one-line pointer (93543, 57 B of headroom); the full explanation already lives in docs/CLI-TOOLS.md and the dispatch step. The flag itself stays in the command, because the orchestrator reads this workflow at runtime and cannot pick it up from docs/. Acknowledge the remaining 143 B of growth by appending to the existing execute-phase.md fragment rather than adding a second one — the ack lint rejects two sources naming the same path. Refs #2596 * fix(#2596): make the execute-phase.md edit net-negative, not merely under the cap The size gate on this file is two assertions, not one: bytes < 93600 AND bytes <= 93400. The base is exactly 93400, so the file is at its budget and any growth trips the margin assertion — the previous fix cleared the ceiling but not that. Move the --files explanation to per-plan-worktree-gate.md, which already owns PLAN_FILES and carries no cap, and reclaim the rest from two clauses in the sentence being edited: the cleanup-wave rules phrasing, and a 'non-zero exit' the very next sentence already states. execute-phase.md ends at 93392, eight bytes below base. The flag itself stays in the command — the orchestrator reads this workflow at runtime and cannot pick it up from docs/. With no growth left, the acknowledgment is unnecessary and its byte delta was no longer true, so the shared ack fragment is restored byte-identical to base. Refs #2596 * docs(#2596): add the how-to for interpreting scope-conformance warnings The docs for this change were entirely Reference — the flag and the warning codes — with the task-oriented quadrant empty. Adds the page that answers the question an operator actually has when the advisory fires: what the two codes mean, that nothing is blocked so there is no failure to hunt for, how to tell whether the executor over-reached or the plan under-declared, and the three ways the check legitimately stays silent so an absence of warnings is not mistaken for proof of conformance. Refs #2596 * chore(#2596): backfill changeset pr number to 3264 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
306 KiB
306 KiB