72819a4616
* test(#3031): failing-first coverage for opt-in ~/.kimi legacy reclaim Drives the user-reachable installer surface against a sandbox HOME seeded with the pre-#2755 wreckage: a GSD [[hooks]] block, hooks bundle and CommonJS marker orphaned in ~/.kimi by a --kimi-code install. Covers the reclaim itself plus the four guards the diagnosis identified as negative space: opt-in only (no flag, no deletion), user-authored TOML and hook files preserved, a --kimi install never reclaiming its own root, and the KIMI_SHARE_DIR/KIMI_CODE_HOME collision where both roots resolve to one directory. Adds a fast-check property that stripping the block never destroys user content. Red until --reclaim-kimi-legacy exists. Refs #3031 * fix(#3031): opt-in reclaim of GSD hooks orphaned in ~/.kimi A --kimi-code install older than 1.10.0 wrote its GSD [[hooks]] block, hook bundle and CommonJS marker into Kimi CLI's ~/.kimi. #2755 fixed the destination but could not reclaim what the old bug already wrote: the stale block is byte-identical to a legitimate Kimi CLI one — both runtimes render the same bytes for the same root, since the command paths derive from the hooks root, not the runtime — so no inspection can tell litter from a working install. Cleanup is therefore opt-in. `--reclaim-kimi-legacy` on a --kimi-code install removes GSD's own artifacts from the legacy root; without it nothing is touched, so a dual-product machine keeps Kimi CLI's hooks and #2755's acceptance criterion holds. Extracts the uninstall path's removal sequence into reclaimKimiHooksRoot() and drives both callers through it, so the reclaim removes precisely what a real uninstall removes rather than a hand-copied second implementation. Guards the wrong-runtime case (a --kimi install would delete its own hooks) and the KIMI_SHARE_DIR/KIMI_CODE_HOME collision where both roots resolve to one directory. Also corrects two pre-#2755 leftovers in the same surface that told users to run `--kimi --config-dir ~/.kimi-code` — the form that produces this very defect, since --config-dir moves only the skills root — and adds the missing --kimi-code entry to the installer's own help. Regression coverage folded into tests/kimi-upgrades.test.cjs beside the #2755 cases, per the regression-test-naming lint. Fixes #3031 * fix(#3031): never reclaim ~/.kimi when this run also installs kimi Found by the isolated adversarial review pass and independently while tracing --all ordering, then reproduced. selectRuntimesFromArgs orders 'kimi' before 'kimi-code' in both --all and an explicit --kimi --kimi-code, and installAllRuntimes installs in that order. So --all --reclaim-kimi-legacy installed a fresh, legitimate Kimi CLI hooks block into ~/.kimi and then deleted it moments later from the kimi-code leg — exiting 0 and reporting success while leaving the user with no Kimi CLI hooks at all. The collision guard could not catch it: kimi-code's own root is ~/.kimi-code, a genuinely different directory. The flag asserts "I only use Kimi Code"; installing kimi in the same invocation falsifies that, so the reclaim is skipped with a notice. Also hardens the collision guard itself. It compared path.resolve strings, which returns false for two spellings of ONE directory — measured, not assumed: a symlinked alias and a case variant on a case-insensitive filesystem both compared unequal, so the guard would not have fired and the install would have deleted its own freshly-written hooks. isSameDirectory now compares directories via resolve, then dev+ino identity, then realpath. Regression tests for all three cases; the two alias tests probe the real filesystem and t.skip() where the alias cannot exist. Refs #3031 * docs(#3031): reattach reclaimKimiHooksRoot's JSDoc to its own function Inserting isSameDirectory anchored on the function name, which placed the helper between reclaimKimiHooksRoot's doc block and the function it documents. isSameDirectory ended up with two stacked doc blocks above it and reclaimKimiHooksRoot with none. Refs #3031 * fix(#3031): warn when --reclaim-kimi-legacy cannot apply The flag only acts inside the kimi-code GLOBAL install branch. Passed with any other runtime, or with --local, it was consumed in silence: exit 0, no cleanup, no message. For a cleanup the user explicitly asked for, silence is indistinguishable from "it ran and found nothing". The scope warning is raised at argument-resolution time rather than inside install(). kimi-code declares hostBehaviors.localInstallDeferred, so install() returns early at the deferral check long before the kimi-hooks-toml branch — a guard placed there is unreachable, which is both dead code and a linted drift shape in this repo. Verified reachable by spawning the real installer. Neither case is a hard error: the flag stays composable with --all, where it is legitimately inert for the other seventeen runtimes. Refs #3031 * docs(#3031): document every case where --reclaim-kimi-legacy skips Refs #3031 * fix(#3031): resolve local config dirs from RUNTIME_META alone in the install harness The remote runner surfaced this: the #3031 warning test drives a local kimi-code install and died with "The path argument must be of type string. Received undefined". runMinimalInstall carried a SECOND, hand-maintained local-dir map beside RUNTIME_META, and it had drifted — four runtimes present in RUNTIME_META (hermes, kimi, kimi-code, zcode) were missing from it, so scope:'local' for any of them resolved path.join(root, undefined) and threw a bare TypeError naming neither the runtime nor the map at fault. #3023 had already hit exactly this for pi and fixed it by adding one more entry, which left the divergence itself in place for the next runtime to rediscover. Local scope now reads RUNTIME_META.localDir, the same table the global branch already reads, with the same loud named error the global branch raises. Parity verified for all 14 previously-supported runtimes: every one resolves to a byte-identical configDir. cline keeps its ternary — its local artifacts land at the project root itself, which is a real exception, not a directory name. Guarded in golden-parity-single-source.test.cjs beside the buildParityManifest anti-divergence test, and both arms of that guard were proven able to fail. Refs #3031 * chore(#3031): backfill changeset pr number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
GSD Core
Git. Ship. Done.
English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
What is GSD Core
GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.
How it works
Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:
- Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
- Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
- Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
- Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
- Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one
Quickstart
npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.
On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.
Once installed, start a new project or onboard an existing repo:
/gsd-new-project # greenfield project
/gsd-onboard # existing codebase
New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase, or Onboarding an existing codebase for brownfield setup.
Documentation
What's new in 1.7.0 → docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md
Tutorials — learning by doing:
How-to guides — task-focused recipes:
Reference — authoritative facts:
Explanation — concepts and design decisions:
Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.
Why it works
Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.
Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.
Community
| Project | Platform |
|---|---|
| gsd-opencode | Original OpenCode port |
| Discord | Community support |
Star History
License
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.