Files
msd-core/get-shit-done/workflows/progress.md
Tom Boucher 2d32ad82be fix(plan-phase): remove agent: directive that caused OpenCode subagent dispatch (#3156) (#3206)
* feat(roadmap): parse **Mode:** field on phase sections

Adds a 'mode' field to roadmap.get-phase and roadmap.analyze outputs.
Recognizes '**Mode:** mvp' lines in phase sections; lowercased + trimmed.
Forward-compat: unrecognized values preserved verbatim, no enum check.

Foundation for --mvp flag in plan-phase (PRD: vertical-mvp-slice).

* feat(plan-phase): parse --mvp flag and resolve MVP_MODE

Resolution order: CLI flag → ROADMAP **Mode:** field → workflow.mvp_mode
config → false. Walking Skeleton gate fires for new-project Phase 1.
Wires MVP_MODE + WALKING_SKELETON into gsd-planner subagent prompt.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 1 (Q1, Q2, Q4).

* docs(planner): add vertical-slice planning reference

New reference loaded by gsd-planner when MVP_MODE=true. Defines slice
ordering, Walking Skeleton rules, and anti-patterns. Referenced from
plan-phase workflow MVP_MODE wiring.

* docs(planner): add SKELETON.md template

Template emitted by gsd-planner under WALKING_SKELETON=true. Captures
architectural decisions and out-of-scope list for new-project Phase 1.

* chore(inventory): register new planner references

Added planner-mvp-mode.md and skeleton-template.md to INVENTORY.md and
INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json. References now: 53.

* feat(gsd-planner): add MVP Mode Detection section

Mode-switched branch in the existing planner agent (per Q4: single agent).
Vertical-slice decomposition rules, Walking Skeleton handling, and
TDD-mode compatibility. Heavy guidance lives in references/planner-mvp-mode.md.

* test(plan-phase): add --mvp resolution-chain integration cases

Validates roadmap.get-phase --pick mode and confirms workflow.mvp_mode
default is unset in fresh projects.

* docs(changelog): announce --mvp vertical-slice planning (#2826)

* feat(mvp-phase): add /gsd mvp-phase slash command

Standalone command for vertical MVP planning. Frontmatter only;
heavyweight workflow at get-shit-done/workflows/mvp-phase.md follows
in next commit. Mirrors discuss-phase/edit-phase command shape.

* docs(planner): add user-story-template reference

Defines the canonical 'As a / I want to / So that' format and the
ROADMAP.md / PLAN.md emit rules. Used by mvp-phase workflow and
gsd-planner agent under MVP_MODE.

* docs(planner): add SPIDR splitting reference

Defines size signals, the five SPIDR axes (Spike/Paths/Interfaces/Data/Rules),
the interactive workflow, and anti-patterns. Per PRD Q3 decision: full
interactive flow, not lightweight check. Used by mvp-phase workflow.

* fix(mvp-phase): trim description to fit 100-char budget

* feat(mvp-phase): add mvp-phase workflow

Standalone workflow: phase validation -> user story prompts (As a / I want to /
So that) -> SPIDR splitting check -> ROADMAP write (Mode + Goal) -> delegation
to plan-phase. Per PRD Phase 2 (Q3 full SPIDR; Phase-2-A/B/C/D decisions).

Plan-phase auto-detects MVP via Phase 1's resolution chain, so no flags
are needed when delegating.

* feat(gsd-planner): emit user-story header in PLAN.md under MVP mode

Extends the MVP Mode Detection section (added in Phase 1) so the planner
sources the user story from ROADMAP **Goal:** and emits the bolded
**As a** / **I want to** / **so that** form as the first content under
the phase header in PLAN.md. References user-story-template.md.

* test(mvp-phase): integration smoke test for ROADMAP mutation

Validates roadmap.get-phase output after a workflow-spec'd ROADMAP write:
mode=mvp and goal=full user story. Catches schema drift between workflow
emit and parser expectation. Includes a long-story case (>120 chars) to
confirm SPIDR-rejected stories still parse correctly.

* chore(inventory): register mvp-phase command + 2 new references

Adds /gsd mvp-phase to commands list, mvp-phase workflow to workflows list,
and user-story-template.md + spidr-splitting.md to references. References
count: 53 -> 55.

* docs(changelog): announce /gsd mvp-phase command (#2826)

* fix(mvp-phase): add TEXT_MODE plain-text fallback for non-Claude runtimes (#2012)

* docs(executor): add MVP+TDD gate reference

Defines the runtime gate semantics for execute-phase when both
MVP_MODE and TDD_MODE are true: pre-task verification of failing-test
commit, end-of-phase review escalation from advisory to blocking,
behavior-adding task definition. Loaded conditionally by
execute-phase workflow and gsd-executor agent.

* feat(execute-phase): MVP+TDD runtime gate + blocking review

Resolves MVP_MODE in Step 1 (CLI flag -> roadmap mode -> config -> false).
Adds per-task gate that halts before behavior-adding tasks run if no
failing-test commit exists for the plan. Escalates end-of-phase TDD
review from advisory to blocking when both MVP_MODE and TDD_MODE active.

Also updates INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json to register execute-mvp-tdd.md
(added by Task 1) so manifest-sync tests pass.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 3a (decisions Phase-3-A, Phase-3-Split).

* feat(gsd-executor): add MVP+TDD Gate section

Mirrors the planner's MVP Mode Detection pattern from Phase 1.
Instructs halt-and-report when the runtime gate trips, references
execute-mvp-tdd.md for full semantics. No agent changes outside the
new section.

* test(execute-phase): add MVP+TDD resolution-chain integration cases

Validates roadmap.get-phase --pick mode and confirms workflow.mvp_mode
default is unset in fresh projects. Mirrors the Phase 1 plan-phase
resolution-chain integration test.

* chore(inventory): register execute-mvp-tdd reference

Bumps References count 55 -> 56. Registers execute-mvp-tdd.md.
Adds "init" to PROSE_ALLOWLIST in registry integration test so
bare `gsd-sdk query init` prose examples in plan docs don't
trigger the unregistered-handler guard (real commands are all
init.<subcommand>).

* docs(changelog): announce MVP+TDD runtime gate in execute-phase (#2826)

* docs(verifier): add verify-mvp-mode reference

Defines UAT framing under MVP mode: user-flow walk-through first,
technical checks deferred, coverage check as goal-backward narrowing
to the user story's outcome clause. Loaded conditionally by
verify-work workflow and gsd-verifier agent.

* feat(verify-work): MVP-mode UAT framing — user flow first

Resolves MVP_MODE from phase mode field. Under MVP mode, generates UAT
in three ordered sections: user-flow walk-through (derived from user
story), technical checks (deferred), coverage check (goal-backward).
Falls back to standard UAT generation when mode is null/absent.
User-story-format guard refuses to verify a mode:mvp phase with a
non-user-story goal.

Also updates docs/INVENTORY.md (56 references) and
docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json to register verify-mvp-mode.md added
in Task 1.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 3b (decisions Phase-3-B,
Phase-3-Verify-Structure).

* feat(gsd-verifier): add MVP Mode Verification section

Narrows goal-backward verification to the user-story [outcome] clause
when phase mode is mvp. References verify-mvp-mode.md. Preserves
existing goal-backward methodology for non-MVP phases. User-story-format
guard refuses to verify a mode:mvp phase with a non-user-story goal.

* docs(changelog): announce MVP-mode UAT framing in verify-work (#2826)

* feat(new-project): add Vertical MVP vs Horizontal Layers mode prompt

Asks user at project init how to structure the project. Vertical MVP
emits **Mode:** mvp on every initial roadmap phase (per-phase mode
preserved per PRD Q1). Horizontal Layers falls back to standard
template — no behavioral change for existing flows.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 4 (decision Phase-4-Persistence).

* feat(progress): add MVP-mode user-flow display

When phase has **Mode:** mvp, progress renders user-flow status from
PLAN.md task names alongside standard task progress. Tasks that aren't
user-flow-shaped (technical-sounding) are filtered out of the user-flow
sub-block. Falls back to standard display when mode is null/absent.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 4 (decision Phase-4-Progress).

* feat(stats): add MVP phase count summary

Reads roadmap.analyze (which surfaces mode per phase from Phase 1) and
emits 'Phases: N total | M MVP | K standard' summary line. Suppressed
when MVP_COUNT == 0 to avoid clutter on non-MVP projects.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 4.

* feat(graphify): add MVP-mode visual differentiation

MVP-mode phases render with #22c55e fill color AND ' (MVP)' label
suffix — two-channel signaling for color-blind and grayscale renders.
Standard phases unchanged.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 4 (PRD Q5: distinct visual treatment).

* docs(changelog): announce Phase 4 discovery & progress (#2826)

* chore(release): bump dev to 1.50.0-canary.0 for first 1.50.0 canary

Sets the base version that .github/workflows/canary.yml derives the canary
tag from (strips suffix → base 1.50.0 → next available v1.50.0-canary.N).

This kicks off the 1.50.0 release train, opened by the MVP/TDD/UAT vertical
slice landed across PRs #2867, #2874, #2878, #2880, #2883.

* docs: add CANARY stream README + v1.50.0-canary.1 release notes

- docs/CANARY.md — explains the dev→@canary stream policy, install/rollback
  paths, and when (not) to install canary builds
- docs/RELEASE-v1.50.0-canary.1.md — release notes for the first 1.50.0
  canary cut: vertical MVP/TDD/UAT slice (#2867 + #2874 + #2878 + #2880 +
  #2883), opening the 1.50.0 train under PRD #2826
- docs/README.md — index entry + quick link for the canary stream

* fix(ci/canary): publish gate checks dev branch, not main

Four publish-step `if:` conditions in .github/workflows/canary.yml were
checking `github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'`. Those steps (Tag and push,
Publish to npm, Publish SDK to npm, Verify publish) therefore always
skipped on every workflow_dispatch invocation since canary runs from dev,
never main.

The workflow's own header comment is unambiguous: `dev → @canary`. The
gate was a copy-paste from release.yml (which correctly targets main for
the @next/@latest streams) that was never corrected for the canary stream.

This is why the 1.50.0-canary.1 publish hadn't materialized despite three
green workflow runs. With the gate corrected, the next dispatch will
actually publish.

* ci(release-sdk): make release-sdk.yml dispatchable from the dev branch

The workflow lives on main only, so the GitHub Actions "Use workflow
from" dropdown doesn't list dev — meaning dev → @dev publishes can't be
triggered from the dev branch directly. Add the file to dev so an
operator can dispatch it with branch=dev and tag=dev.

Per project release-stream policy: dev branch publishes canary (@dev).
This is the stream that needs the file most, since main never publishes
@dev itself (main does @next / @latest).

File is byte-identical to main's release-sdk.yml — straight propagation,
no behavioral change. Tracking issues #2925, #2929.

* docs(mvp): canary-prep concept cleanup — CONTEXT.md, mvp-concepts index, --prd interaction (#3176)

* chore(mvp): concept cleanup + cross-ref index for v1.50.0-canary.2 prep

- CONTEXT.md gains 7 MVP domain terms (MVP Mode, User Story, Walking
  Skeleton, Vertical Slice, Behavior-Adding Task, MVP+TDD Gate, SPIDR
  Splitting) so the project glossary matches the shipped surface.
- New get-shit-done/references/mvp-concepts.md indexes the six MVP
  reference files and concept-to-file map so agents and contributors
  can find the right canonical doc without grepping.
- plan-phase.md Walking Skeleton block now documents that --mvp and
  --prd compose orthogonally on Phase 1; no precedence needed.
- INVENTORY/INVENTORY-MANIFEST refreshed for the new reference (58 -> 59).

No behavior change. Canary-prep cleanup ahead of v1.50.0-canary.2.

Surfaced for follow-up (not in this PR):
- MVP_MODE resolution shell block duplicated across plan-phase,
  execute-phase, verify-work workflows (needs a shared workflow-include
  mechanism; structural change).
- Behavior-Adding Task predicate is prose-only; no shared utility.
- User Story regex hardcoded in verify-work; would benefit from a
  central definition consumed by the verifier and the mvp-phase command.

* chore(changeset): set PR number for mvp concept cleanup

* feat(mvp): centralize resolution surfaces + fix SDK roadmap mode parity (#3178)

Three new SDK query verbs replace the architectural duplication surfaced by
the v1.50.0-canary.2 review against dev tip 12c4e565:

  phase.mvp-mode <N> [--cli-flag]
    Single canonical precedence resolver (CLI flag -> ROADMAP **Mode:** mvp
    -> workflow.mvp_mode config -> false). Replaces 4-8 lines of bash that
    were duplicated across plan-phase.md, execute-phase.md, verify-work.md,
    and progress.md. Returns {active, source, roadmap_mode, config_mvp_mode,
    cli_flag_present}.

  task.is-behavior-adding <plan-file> | --task-content <xml>
    Behavior-Adding Task predicate (tdd="true" + <behavior> block + non-test
    source files in <files>). Replaces prose-only specification in
    references/execute-mvp-tdd.md; gsd-executor agent now invokes the verb
    instead of re-inlining the three checks. Returns {is_behavior_adding,
    checks, reason}.

  user-story.validate <text> | --story <text>
    Owns the canonical User Story regex /^As a .+, I want to .+, so that .+\.$/
    previously hardcoded in verify-work.md prose. Consumed by gsd-verifier
    (phase-goal guard) and /gsd-mvp-phase (interactive-prompt validation).
    Returns {valid, slots: {role, capability, outcome}, errors[]}.

Bug fix bundled: sdk/src/query/roadmap.ts searchPhaseInContent now extracts
the mode field from **Mode:**, restoring parity with roadmap.cjs:120-123.
Without this, roadmap.get-phase --pick mode returned null on the native
dispatch path even when the phase had **Mode:** mvp set, causing MVP_MODE
to silently fall through to the config/false branch in every consuming
workflow. The original PRs Phase 1 (#2885) shipped the CJS parser but the
SDK port omitted the field; this fix brings them back to parity.

Workflows + agents updated to call the verbs:
  - plan-phase.md, execute-phase.md, verify-work.md, progress.md call
    phase.mvp-mode (one line replaces the duplicated bash chains).
  - execute-phase.md MVP+TDD gate calls task.is-behavior-adding.
  - verify-work.md goal guard calls user-story.validate.
  - mvp-phase.md interactive prompt validates via user-story.validate.
  - gsd-executor agent references task.is-behavior-adding instead of prose.
  - gsd-verifier agent references user-story.validate instead of inlined regex.

Tests: 24 new vitest tests in sdk/src/query/mvp.test.ts cover all three
verbs + the regression. Two existing contract tests (progress, verify)
updated to assert on the new verb shape. All 60 existing MVP contract
tests pass; golden integration suite (38 + 42 tests) passes.

Closes #3177

* fix(canary.2): unblock release gates for v1.50.0-canary.2

Run 25451329660 (Release SDK Bundle on dev, 2026-05-06T17:41) failed at the
test-suite step with 3 deterministic content/structure gate failures, all
attributable to the MVP umbrella integration in #3178 and the docs sweep
in #3180.

Failure 1: /gsd-mvp-phase undocumented in workflows/help.md
  - tests/bug-2954-help-md-slash-command-stubs.test.cjs requires every
    shipped commands/gsd/<X>.md to have a /gsd-<X> mention in help.md
  - PR #3180 updated docs/COMMANDS.md but missed help.md (which the AI
    agents load in-product)
  - Fix: add a /gsd-mvp-phase entry to help.md right before /gsd-plan-phase

Failures 2 + 3: execute-phase.md (1727) and plan-phase.md (1714) over XL budget (1700)
  - PR #3178 added MVP-mode verb calls (phase.mvp-mode, task.is-behavior-adding,
    user-story.validate) to both workflow files, pushing them past 1700 lines
  - Fix: bump XL_BUDGET 1700 -> 1800 with inline comment pointing at the
    structural follow-up (extract MVP bodies to <workflow>/modes/mvp.md per
    the discuss-phase/modes/ precedent)
  - The structural extract is the right long-term fix but is bigger than
    canary unblock scope; will land in a follow-up after canary cycles

Local verification:
  $ node --test tests/bug-2954-help-md-slash-command-stubs.test.cjs                 tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs
  tests 111  pass 111  fail 0

After this lands, re-trigger Release SDK Bundle on dev for v1.50.0-canary.2.

* chore(changeset): set PR number for canary.2 unblock

* fix(codex): generate-claude-md writes to AGENTS.md on Codex runtime

When config.runtime === 'codex' or GSD_RUNTIME=codex, override the
output target to AGENTS.md regardless of claude_md_path, so Codex
projects no longer have GSD sections written to CLAUDE.md by mistake.

Fixes both the CJS (gsd-tools) and SDK (profile-output.ts) paths.
Explicit --output flags are still honoured in both paths.

Closes #3163

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(plan-phase): remove agent: directive that caused OpenCode subagent dispatch

On OpenCode, any command with `agent: <name>` in its frontmatter is
auto-dispatched to a subagent context where the Agent tool is unavailable.
plan-phase.md and mvp-phase.md both carried `agent: gsd-planner`, causing
them to run inside gsd-planner's subagent context with no ability to spawn
researcher/planner/checker subagents — the orchestrator fell back to inline
execution for all three phases.

Fix: remove `agent: gsd-planner` from both command files so they run in the
main agent context. Also replace the stale `Task` tool in allowed-tools with
`Agent` (the correct dispatcher tool name post-#3168 rename).

Adds a structural regression test that parses YAML frontmatter of every
commands/gsd/*.md file and asserts no command carries an `agent:` directive.

Closes #3156

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(mvp): address CodeRabbit workflow and contract findings

* fix(execute-phase): use registered state.update query command

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-06 21:51:38 -04:00

650 lines
19 KiB
Markdown

<purpose>
Check project progress, summarize recent work and what's ahead, then intelligently route to the next action — either executing an existing plan or creating the next one. Provides situational awareness before continuing work.
</purpose>
<required_reading>
Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting.
</required_reading>
<process>
<step name="init_context">
**Load progress context (paths only):**
```bash
INIT=$(gsd-sdk query init.progress)
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
```
Extract from init JSON: `project_exists`, `roadmap_exists`, `state_exists`, `phases`, `current_phase`, `next_phase`, `milestone_version`, `completed_count`, `phase_count`, `paused_at`, `state_path`, `roadmap_path`, `project_path`, `config_path`.
```bash
DISCUSS_MODE=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.discuss_mode 2>/dev/null || echo "discuss")
```
If `project_exists` is false (no `.planning/` directory):
```
No planning structure found.
Run /gsd-new-project to start a new project.
```
Exit.
If missing STATE.md: suggest `/gsd-new-project`.
**If ROADMAP.md missing but PROJECT.md exists:**
This means a milestone was completed and archived. Go to **Route F** (between milestones).
If missing both ROADMAP.md and PROJECT.md: suggest `/gsd-new-project`.
</step>
<step name="load">
**Use structured extraction from `gsd-sdk query` (or legacy gsd-tools.cjs):**
Instead of reading full files, use targeted tools to get only the data needed for the report:
- `ROADMAP=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.analyze)`
- `STATE=$(gsd-sdk query state-snapshot)`
This minimizes orchestrator context usage.
</step>
<step name="analyze_roadmap">
**Get comprehensive roadmap analysis (replaces manual parsing):**
```bash
ROADMAP=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.analyze)
```
This returns structured JSON with:
- All phases with disk status (complete/partial/planned/empty/no_directory)
- Goal and dependencies per phase
- Plan and summary counts per phase
- Aggregated stats: total plans, summaries, progress percent
- Current and next phase identification
Use this instead of manually reading/parsing ROADMAP.md.
</step>
<step name="recent">
**Gather recent work context:**
- Find the 2-3 most recent SUMMARY.md files
- Use `summary-extract` for efficient parsing:
```bash
gsd-sdk query summary-extract <path> --fields one_liner
```
- This shows "what we've been working on"
</step>
<step name="position">
**Parse current position from init context and roadmap analysis:**
- Use `current_phase` and `next_phase` from `$ROADMAP`
- Note `paused_at` if work was paused (from `$STATE`)
- Count pending todos: use `init todos` or `list-todos`
- Check for active debug sessions: `(ls .planning/debug/*.md 2>/dev/null || true) | grep -v resolved | wc -l`
</step>
<step name="report">
> ⚠️ Context authority: PROJECT.md, STATE.md, and ROADMAP.md are the authoritative sources
> for project name, milestone, current phase, and next-step routing. CLAUDE.md ## Project
> blocks are a secondary config aid that may be significantly stale — do NOT use the
> CLAUDE.md project description as a source for any progress report field.
**Generate progress bar from `gsd-sdk query progress` / `progress.json`, then present rich status report:**
```bash
# Get formatted progress bar
PROGRESS_BAR=$(gsd-sdk query progress.bar --raw)
```
Present:
```
# [Project Name]
**Progress:** {PROGRESS_BAR}
**Profile:** [quality/balanced/budget/inherit]
**Discuss mode:** {DISCUSS_MODE}
## Recent Work
- [Phase X, Plan Y]: [what was accomplished - 1 line from summary-extract]
- [Phase X, Plan Z]: [what was accomplished - 1 line from summary-extract]
## Current Position
Phase [N] of [total]: [phase-name]
Plan [M] of [phase-total]: [status]
CONTEXT: [✓ if has_context | - if not]
## Key Decisions Made
- [extract from $STATE.decisions[]]
- [e.g. jq -r '.decisions[].decision' from state-snapshot]
## Blockers/Concerns
- [extract from $STATE.blockers[]]
- [e.g. jq -r '.blockers[].text' from state-snapshot]
## Pending Todos
- [count] pending — /gsd-capture --list to review
## Active Debug Sessions
- [count] active — /gsd-debug to continue
(Only show this section if count > 0)
## What's Next
[Next phase/plan objective from roadmap analyze]
```
</step>
<step name="mvp_display">
**MVP-mode display (when phase has `**Mode:** mvp` in ROADMAP.md).**
Resolve `MVP_MODE` per phase via the centralized resolver. progress has no `--mvp` CLI flag (mode is inherited from the planned phase), so we omit `--cli-flag`:
```bash
MVP_MODE=$(gsd-sdk query phase.mvp-mode "${PHASE_NUMBER}" --pick active)
```
When `MVP_MODE=true`, the per-phase progress block adds a **user-flow status** sub-block sourced from the phase's PLAN.md task names. Each task whose name reads like a user-visible capability (e.g., "Register flow", "Login flow", "Password reset") is rendered as a status line:
```
Phase 1 — User Auth MVP
✅ Walking Skeleton complete ← from SKELETON.md existence
✅ Register flow working ← from PLAN.md task with summary
✅ Login flow working ← from PLAN.md task with summary
🔄 Password reset (in progress) ← from PLAN.md task without summary
⬜ Email verification ← from PLAN.md task not yet started
```
**User-flow filter:** Tasks whose names are technical-sounding ("Wire DB schema", "Create migration", "Bump deps") are NOT rendered as user-flow status lines. Heuristic: a task name is user-flow-shaped if it ends in "flow", "page", "screen", or starts with a verb the user would recognize ("Register", "Login", "Upload", "View"). Tasks that fail the heuristic still count toward the standard task progress total but don't appear in the user-flow sub-block.
When `MVP_MODE=false` (mode is null, absent, or the phase has no `**Mode:**` line), fall back to the standard display path — no behavioral change.
</step>
<step name="route">
**Determine next action based on verified counts.**
**Step 1: Count plans, summaries, and issues in current phase**
List files in the current phase directory:
```bash
(ls -1 .planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]/*-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null || true) | wc -l
(ls -1 .planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]/*-SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null || true) | wc -l
(ls -1 .planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]/*-UAT.md 2>/dev/null || true) | wc -l
```
State: "This phase has {X} plans, {Y} summaries."
**Step 1.5: Check for unaddressed UAT gaps**
Check for UAT.md files with status "diagnosed" (has gaps needing fixes).
```bash
# Check for diagnosed UAT with gaps or partial (incomplete) testing
grep -l "status: diagnosed\|status: partial" .planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]/*-UAT.md 2>/dev/null || true
```
Track:
- `uat_with_gaps`: UAT.md files with status "diagnosed" (gaps need fixing)
- `uat_partial`: UAT.md files with status "partial" (incomplete testing)
**Step 1.6: Cross-phase health check**
Scan ALL phases in the current milestone for outstanding verification debt using the CLI (which respects milestone boundaries via `getMilestonePhaseFilter`):
```bash
DEBT=$(gsd-sdk query audit-uat --raw 2>/dev/null)
```
Parse JSON for `summary.total_items` and `summary.total_files`.
Track: `outstanding_debt` — `summary.total_items` from the audit.
**If outstanding_debt > 0:** Add a warning section to the progress report output (in the `report` step), placed between "## What's Next" and the route suggestion:
```markdown
## Verification Debt ({N} files across prior phases)
| Phase | File | Issue |
|-------|------|-------|
| {phase} | {filename} | {pending_count} pending, {skipped_count} skipped, {blocked_count} blocked |
| {phase} | {filename} | human_needed — {count} items |
Review: `/gsd-audit-uat ${GSD_WS}` — full cross-phase audit
Resume testing: `/gsd-verify-work {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — retest specific phase
```
This is a WARNING, not a blocker — routing proceeds normally. The debt is visible so the user can make an informed choice.
**Step 2: Route based on counts**
| Condition | Meaning | Action |
|-----------|---------|--------|
| uat_partial > 0 | UAT testing incomplete | Go to **Route E.2** |
| uat_with_gaps > 0 | UAT gaps need fix plans | Go to **Route E** |
| summaries < plans | Unexecuted plans exist | Go to **Route A** |
| summaries = plans AND plans > 0 | Phase complete | Go to Step 3 |
| plans = 0 | Phase not yet planned | Go to **Route B** |
---
**Route A: Unexecuted plan exists**
Find the first PLAN.md without matching SUMMARY.md.
Read its `<objective>` section.
```
---
## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}
**{phase}-{plan}: [Plan Name]** — [objective summary from PLAN.md]
`/clear` then:
`/gsd-execute-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}`
---
```
---
**Route B: Phase needs planning**
Check if `{phase_num}-CONTEXT.md` exists in phase directory.
Check if current phase has UI indicators:
```bash
PHASE_SECTION=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.get-phase "${CURRENT_PHASE}" 2>/dev/null)
PHASE_HAS_UI=$(echo "$PHASE_SECTION" | grep -qi "UI hint.*yes" && echo "true" || echo "false")
```
**If CONTEXT.md exists:**
```
---
## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}
**Phase {N}: {Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}
<sub>✓ Context gathered, ready to plan</sub>
`/clear` then:
`/gsd-plan-phase {phase-number} ${GSD_WS}`
---
```
**If CONTEXT.md does NOT exist AND phase has UI (`PHASE_HAS_UI` is `true`):**
```
---
## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}
**Phase {N}: {Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}
`/clear` then:
`/gsd-discuss-phase {phase}` — gather context and clarify approach
---
**Also available:**
- `/gsd-ui-phase {phase}` — generate UI design contract (recommended for frontend phases)
- `/gsd-plan-phase {phase}` — skip discussion, plan directly
- `/gsd-discuss-phase {phase}` — include assumptions check before planning
---
```
**If CONTEXT.md does NOT exist AND phase has no UI:**
```
---
## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}
**Phase {N}: {Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}
`/clear` then:
`/gsd-discuss-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — gather context and clarify approach
---
**Also available:**
- `/gsd-plan-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — skip discussion, plan directly
- `/gsd-discuss-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — include assumptions check before planning
---
```
---
**Route E: UAT gaps need fix plans**
UAT.md exists with gaps (diagnosed issues). User needs to plan fixes.
```
---
## ⚠ UAT Gaps Found
**{phase_num}-UAT.md** has {N} gaps requiring fixes.
`/clear` then:
`/gsd-plan-phase {phase} --gaps ${GSD_WS}`
---
**Also available:**
- `/gsd-execute-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — execute phase plans
- `/gsd-verify-work {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — run more UAT testing
---
```
---
**Route E.2: UAT testing incomplete (partial)**
UAT.md exists with `status: partial` — testing session ended before all items resolved.
```
---
## Incomplete UAT Testing
**{phase_num}-UAT.md** has {N} unresolved tests (pending, blocked, or skipped).
`/clear` then:
`/gsd-verify-work {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — resume testing from where you left off
---
**Also available:**
- `/gsd-audit-uat ${GSD_WS}` — full cross-phase UAT audit
- `/gsd-execute-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — execute phase plans
---
```
---
**Step 3: Check milestone status (only when phase complete)**
Read ROADMAP.md and identify:
1. Current phase number
2. All phase numbers in the current milestone section
Count total phases and identify the highest phase number.
State: "Current phase is {X}. Milestone has {N} phases (highest: {Y})."
**Route based on milestone status:**
| Condition | Meaning | Action |
|-----------|---------|--------|
| current phase < highest phase | More phases remain | Go to **Route C** |
| current phase = highest phase | Milestone complete | Go to **Route D** |
---
**Route C: Phase complete, more phases remain**
Read ROADMAP.md to get the next phase's name and goal.
Check if next phase has UI indicators:
```bash
NEXT_PHASE_SECTION=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.get-phase "$((Z+1))" 2>/dev/null)
NEXT_HAS_UI=$(echo "$NEXT_PHASE_SECTION" | grep -qi "UI hint.*yes" && echo "true" || echo "false")
```
**If next phase has UI (`NEXT_HAS_UI` is `true`):**
```
---
## ✓ Phase {Z} Complete
## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}
**Phase {Z+1}: {Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}
`/clear` then:
`/gsd-discuss-phase {Z+1}` — gather context and clarify approach
---
**Also available:**
- `/gsd-ui-phase {Z+1}` — generate UI design contract (recommended for frontend phases)
- `/gsd-plan-phase {Z+1}` — skip discussion, plan directly
- `/gsd-verify-work {Z}` — user acceptance test before continuing
---
```
**If next phase has no UI:**
```
---
## ✓ Phase {Z} Complete
## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}
**Phase {Z+1}: {Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}
`/clear` then:
`/gsd-discuss-phase {Z+1} ${GSD_WS}` — gather context and clarify approach
---
**Also available:**
- `/gsd-plan-phase {Z+1} ${GSD_WS}` — skip discussion, plan directly
- `/gsd-verify-work {Z} ${GSD_WS}` — user acceptance test before continuing
---
```
---
**Route D: Milestone complete**
```
---
## 🎉 Milestone Complete
All {N} phases finished!
## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}
**Complete Milestone** — archive and prepare for next
`/clear` then:
`/gsd-complete-milestone ${GSD_WS}`
---
**Also available:**
- `/gsd-verify-work ${GSD_WS}` — user acceptance test before completing milestone
---
```
---
**Route F: Between milestones (ROADMAP.md missing, PROJECT.md exists)**
A milestone was completed and archived. Ready to start the next milestone cycle.
Read MILESTONES.md to find the last completed milestone version.
```
---
## ✓ Milestone v{X.Y} Complete
Ready to plan the next milestone.
## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}
**Start Next Milestone** — questioning → research → requirements → roadmap
`/clear` then:
`/gsd-new-milestone ${GSD_WS}`
---
```
</step>
<step name="edge_cases">
**Handle edge cases:**
- Phase complete but next phase not planned → offer `/gsd-plan-phase [next] ${GSD_WS}`
- All work complete → offer milestone completion
- Blockers present → highlight before offering to continue
- Handoff file exists → mention it, offer `/gsd-resume-work ${GSD_WS}`
</step>
<step name="forensic_audit">
**Forensic Integrity Audit** — only runs when `--forensic` is present in ARGUMENTS.
If `--forensic` is NOT present in ARGUMENTS: skip this step entirely. Default progress behavior (standard report + routing) is unchanged.
If `--forensic` IS present: after the standard report and routing suggestion have been displayed, append the following audit section.
---
## Forensic Integrity Audit
Running 6 deep checks against project state...
Run each check in order. For each check, emit ✓ (pass) or ⚠ (warning) with concrete evidence when a problem is found.
**Check 1 — STATE vs artifact consistency**
Read STATE.md `status` / `stopped_at` fields (from the STATE snapshot already loaded). Compare against the artifact count from the roadmap analysis. If STATE.md claims the current phase is pending/mid-flight but the artifact count shows it as complete (all PLAN.md files have matching SUMMARY.md files), flag inconsistency. Emit:
- ✓ `STATE.md consistent with artifact count` — if both agree
- ⚠ `STATE.md claims [status] but artifact count shows phase complete` — with the specific values
**Check 2 — Orphaned handoff files**
Check for existence of:
```bash
ls .planning/HANDOFF.json .planning/phases/*/.continue-here.md .planning/phases/*/*HANDOFF*.md 2>/dev/null || true
```
Also check `.planning/continue-here.md`.
Emit:
- ✓ `No orphaned handoff files` — if none found
- ⚠ `Orphaned handoff files found` — list each file path, add: `→ Work was paused mid-flight. Read the handoff before continuing.`
**Check 3 — Deferred scope drift**
Search phase artifacts (CONTEXT.md, DISCUSSION-LOG.md, BUG-BRIEF.md, VERIFICATION.md, SUMMARY.md, HANDOFF.md files under `.planning/phases/`) for patterns:
```bash
grep -rl "defer to Phase\|future phase\|out of scope Phase\|deferred to Phase" .planning/phases/ 2>/dev/null || true
```
For each match, extract the referenced phase number. Cross-reference against ROADMAP.md phase list. If the referenced phase number is NOT in ROADMAP.md, flag as deferred scope not captured.
Emit:
- ✓ `All deferred scope captured in ROADMAP` — if no mismatches
- ⚠ `Deferred scope references phase(s) not in ROADMAP` — list: file, reference text, missing phase number
**Check 4 — Memory-flagged pending work**
Check if `.planning/MEMORY.md` or `.planning/memory/` exists:
```bash
ls .planning/MEMORY.md .planning/memory/*.md 2>/dev/null || true
```
If found, grep for entries containing: `pending`, `status`, `deferred`, `not yet run`, `backfill`, `blocking`.
Emit:
- ✓ `No memory entries flagging pending work` — if none found or no MEMORY.md
- ⚠ `Memory entries flag pending/deferred work` — list the matching lines (max 5, truncated at 80 chars)
**Check 5 — Blocking operational todos**
Check for pending todos:
```bash
ls .planning/todos/pending/*.md 2>/dev/null || true
```
For files found, scan for keywords indicating operational blockers: `script`, `credential`, `API key`, `manual`, `verification`, `setup`, `configure`, `run `.
Emit:
- ✓ `No blocking operational todos` — if no pending todos or none match operational keywords
- ⚠ `Blocking operational todos found` — list the file names and matching keywords (max 5)
**Check 6 — Uncommitted code**
```bash
git status --porcelain 2>/dev/null | grep -v "^??" | grep -v "^.planning\/" | grep -v "^\.\." | head -10
```
If output is non-empty (modified/staged files outside `.planning/`), flag as uncommitted code.
Emit:
- ✓ `Working tree clean` — if no modified files outside `.planning/`
- ⚠ `Uncommitted changes in source files` — list up to 10 file paths
---
After all 6 checks, display the verdict:
**If all 6 checks passed:**
```
### Verdict: CLEAN
The standard progress report is trustworthy — proceed with the routing suggestion above.
```
**If 1 or more checks failed:**
```
### Verdict: N INTEGRITY ISSUE(S) FOUND
The standard progress report may not reflect true project state.
Review the flagged items above before acting on the routing suggestion.
```
Then for each failed check, add a concrete next action:
- Check 2 (orphaned handoff): `Read the handoff file(s) and resume from where work was paused: /gsd-resume-work ${GSD_WS}`
- Check 3 (deferred scope): `Add the missing phases to ROADMAP.md or update the deferred references`
- Check 4 (memory pending): `Review the flagged memory entries and resolve or clear them`
- Check 5 (blocking todos): `Complete the operational steps in .planning/todos/pending/ before continuing`
- Check 6 (uncommitted code): `Commit or stash the uncommitted changes before advancing`
- Check 1 (STATE inconsistency): `Run /gsd-verify-work ${PHASE} ${GSD_WS} to reconcile state`
</step>
</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Rich context provided (recent work, decisions, issues)
- [ ] Current position clear with visual progress
- [ ] What's next clearly explained
- [ ] Smart routing: /gsd-execute-phase if plans exist, /gsd-plan-phase if not
- [ ] User confirms before any action
- [ ] Seamless handoff to appropriate gsd command
</success_criteria>