8dcdcb253e
* test(#4443): failing-first regression coverage for hooks.commit_types config key isValidConfigKey('hooks.commit_types') currently returns false and config-set hooks.commit_types rejects with "Unknown config key", because the key was never added to config-schema.manifest.json's validKeys when it shipped (#3811/#4340, 1.13.0) despite being documented (docs/COMMANDS.md) and consumed by hooks/gsd-validate-commit.sh. This commit adds the regression coverage only; the manifest fix lands in the next commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#4443): avoid false-positive docs-guard registration trip The assert message for the new hooks.commit_types test mentioned "docs/COMMANDS.md" literally, which happened to land between two unrelated pre-existing backticks and tripped lint-docs-guard-registration.cjs's template-literal co-occurrence detector (a known, documented false-positive shape for that lint). Rephrased to drop the literal docs/ path from the message; the test's intent (documenting why the key must be valid) is unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#4443): register hooks.commit_types (and sibling hooks.community) in config schema config-schema.manifest.json's validKeys never got hooks.commit_types added when the feature shipped (#3811/#4340, 1.13.0) despite it being documented (docs/COMMANDS.md) and consumed by hooks/gsd-validate-commit.sh -- so config-set hooks.commit_types rejected with "Unknown config key", and the only way to configure a documented feature was hand-editing .planning/config.json. While auditing every hooks.* key actually read by shipped code against validKeys (CLAUDE.md's no-deferrals rule: a defect found anywhere in the tree while working an issue is fixed in the current change, not filed separately), hooks.community -- gsd-validate-commit.sh's own opt-in gate -- turned out to have the exact same gap. Both are added here; an audit of every hooks.* read site confirmed these are the only two missing entries. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#4443): e2e coverage for hooks.community + changeset Closes the coverage-rigor gap the Standards review flagged: hooks.community had only a unit-level isValidConfigKey assertion, not the same real config-set CLI round-trip hooks.commit_types already got. Also adds the changeset fragment the same review flagged as a missing hard requirement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#4443): use PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS instead of a bare 15000 literal local/no-adhoc-timeout-literal (lint:ci) correctly flagged both new spawnSync calls' bare timeout: 15000 -- this call class (a short CLI probe against a temp fixture) is exactly what tests/helpers/timeouts.cjs's PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS documents. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#4443): backfill changeset PR number Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GSD Core
Git. Ship. Done.
English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
What is GSD Core
GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.
How it works
Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:
- Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
- Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
- Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
- Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
- Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one
Quickstart
npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.
On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.
Once installed, start a new project or onboard an existing repo:
/gsd-new-project # greenfield project
/gsd-onboard # existing codebase
New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase, or Onboarding an existing codebase for brownfield setup.
Documentation
What's new in 1.7.0 → docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md
Tutorials — learning by doing:
How-to guides — task-focused recipes:
Reference — authoritative facts:
Explanation — concepts and design decisions:
Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.
Why it works
Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.
Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.
Community
| Project | Platform |
|---|---|
| gsd-opencode | Original OpenCode port |
| Discord | Community support |
Star History
License
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.