2537c286f9
* test(#1762): assert reassuring verification-routing wording (RED) Regression test for #1762 — asserts readVerificationStatus's missing/ unknown next_action text reassures the user that execute-phase resumes at the verification gates without redoing work, instead of reading as a blind re-run instruction. Fails against current wording; the fix lands in the next commit. * fix(#1762): reassure verification-missing/unknown routing text is safe to run readVerificationStatus's 'missing' and 'unknown' next_action text read as "redo the implementation", when execute-phase's own discover_and_group_plans step (#2868) already resumes at the verification gates and skips execute_waves/checkpoint_handling entirely when every plan already has a SUMMARY.md. Reword both to say so explicitly, and soften the 'unknown' message to acknowledge a non-standard status may be an intentional marker rather than presuming re-verification is always the fix. Also updates progress.md's Route V.missing / V.unknown to consume the dynamic $VERIFICATION_NEXT_ACTION (matching V.gaps/V.human) instead of a hand-duplicated string, so the reassurance lands there too without a second copy to keep in sync. No change to next_command routing, status values, or the isPhaseComplete completeness predicate (still gated on status === 'passed' per the #2957 DISK-STRICT decision) — advisory text only. * fix(#1762): drop duplicated reassurance clause in progress.md routing text Review finding: the SUMMARY.md reassurance was stated once via the interpolated $VERIFICATION_NEXT_ACTION and again as a parenthetical on the command line, in both Route V.missing and Route V.unknown. Trimmed the parenthetical so $VERIFICATION_NEXT_ACTION stays the single source of truth. * docs(#1762): add changeset fragment Type Changed with a docs-exempt marker — advisory routing text only, no docs page documents this specific message today. * test(#1762): acknowledge progress.md emitted-content growth Route V.missing/V.unknown now render a small block referencing ${VERIFICATION_NEXT_ACTION} instead of a bare command line, growing progress.md by 376 bytes. Deliberate per the differential attribution check (ADR-2719). * chore: drop spent progress.md ack from #3218's emitted-drift fragment The #3218 growth it described is already on next (inert, per the lint's own note that spent acks 'can no longer clear anything'). Its presence collided with the new #1762 fragment naming the same bare filename, which lint-emitted-drift-ack rejects outright ('two ack sources may never name the same path'). #3218's other two acks (plan-phase.md, plan-review-convergence.md) are untouched. * docs(#1762): backfill changeset PR number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
58 KiB
58 KiB