Tom Boucher 90b33d050c fix(phase): unify phase-dir naming via shared helper across creation paths (#3287) (#3292) ...

* test: phase-dir prefix parity across creation paths (#3287 RED)

Add failing tests asserting that init.phase-op and init.plan-phase
expose expected_phase_dir with the project_code prefix when the phase
directory does not yet exist — matching the prefix applied by phase.add.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(phase): unify phase-dir naming via shared getPhaseDirName helper (#3287)

Both init.phase-op (discuss-phase workflow) and init.plan-phase
(plan-phase workflow) now compute expected_phase_dir — the canonical
directory name including the project_code prefix when set — and expose
it in their JSON bundle.

Workflow fallback mkdir calls are updated to use ${expected_phase_dir}
instead of constructing the path from padded_phase + phase_slug, which
was missing the project_code prefix.

This eliminates the two-headed naming convention where phase.add/insert
produced XR-01-foundation/ while the first-touch paths produced
01-foundation/ for the same project.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor(phase): apply project_code prefix in scaffold phase-dir (#3287)

Audit finding: phase.scaffold (CJS commands.cjs + SDK phase-lifecycle.ts)
also constructed phase dir names without project_code prefix.

Both implementations now read config.project_code and apply the same
prefix logic as phase.add/phase.insert.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* changeset: pr=3292 for #3287

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(changelog): add entry for #3287 phase-dir prefix parity fix

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-05-09 07:32:31 -04:00

7.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw