TDD requires 2-3 execution cycles (RED → GREEN → REFACTOR), each with file reads, test runs, and potential debugging. This consumes 40-50% of context for a single feature. Dedicated TDD plans ensure full quality throughout the cycle. - TDD plans use `type: tdd` frontmatter with `<feature>` element - One feature per TDD plan (batching defeats the purpose) - Target ~40% context usage for TDD plans - Standard plans handle non-TDD work with 2-3 tasks 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
304 lines
8.4 KiB
Markdown
304 lines
8.4 KiB
Markdown
# Phase Prompt Template
|
|
|
|
Template for `.planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md` - executable phase plans.
|
|
|
|
**Naming:** Use `{phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md` format (e.g., `01-02-PLAN.md` for Phase 1, Plan 2)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## File Template
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
---
|
|
phase: XX-name
|
|
type: execute
|
|
domain: [optional - if domain skill loaded]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
<objective>
|
|
[What this phase accomplishes - from roadmap phase goal]
|
|
|
|
Purpose: [Why this matters for the project]
|
|
Output: [What artifacts will be created]
|
|
</objective>
|
|
|
|
<execution_context>
|
|
~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md
|
|
./summary.md
|
|
[If plan contains checkpoint tasks (type="checkpoint:*"), add:]
|
|
~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/checkpoints.md
|
|
</execution_context>
|
|
|
|
<context>
|
|
@.planning/PROJECT.md
|
|
@.planning/ROADMAP.md
|
|
[If discovery exists:]
|
|
@.planning/phases/XX-name/DISCOVERY.md
|
|
[Relevant source files:]
|
|
@src/path/to/relevant.ts
|
|
</context>
|
|
|
|
<tasks>
|
|
|
|
<task type="auto">
|
|
<name>Task 1: [Action-oriented name]</name>
|
|
<files>path/to/file.ext, another/file.ext</files>
|
|
<action>[Specific implementation - what to do, how to do it, what to avoid and WHY]</action>
|
|
<verify>[Command or check to prove it worked]</verify>
|
|
<done>[Measurable acceptance criteria]</done>
|
|
</task>
|
|
|
|
<task type="auto">
|
|
<name>Task 2: [Action-oriented name]</name>
|
|
<files>path/to/file.ext</files>
|
|
<action>[Specific implementation]</action>
|
|
<verify>[Command or check]</verify>
|
|
<done>[Acceptance criteria]</done>
|
|
</task>
|
|
|
|
<task type="checkpoint:decision" gate="blocking">
|
|
<decision>[What needs deciding]</decision>
|
|
<context>[Why this decision matters]</context>
|
|
<options>
|
|
<option id="option-a">
|
|
<name>[Option name]</name>
|
|
<pros>[Benefits and advantages]</pros>
|
|
<cons>[Tradeoffs and limitations]</cons>
|
|
</option>
|
|
<option id="option-b">
|
|
<name>[Option name]</name>
|
|
<pros>[Benefits and advantages]</pros>
|
|
<cons>[Tradeoffs and limitations]</cons>
|
|
</option>
|
|
</options>
|
|
<resume-signal>[How to indicate choice - "Select: option-a or option-b"]</resume-signal>
|
|
</task>
|
|
|
|
<task type="auto">
|
|
<name>Task 3: [Action-oriented name]</name>
|
|
<files>path/to/file.ext</files>
|
|
<action>[Specific implementation]</action>
|
|
<verify>[Command or check]</verify>
|
|
<done>[Acceptance criteria]</done>
|
|
</task>
|
|
|
|
<task type="checkpoint:human-verify" gate="blocking">
|
|
<what-built>[What Claude just built that needs verification]</what-built>
|
|
<how-to-verify>
|
|
1. Run: [command to start dev server/app]
|
|
2. Visit: [URL to check]
|
|
3. Test: [Specific interactions]
|
|
4. Confirm: [Expected behaviors]
|
|
</how-to-verify>
|
|
<resume-signal>Type "approved" to continue, or describe issues to fix</resume-signal>
|
|
</task>
|
|
|
|
[Continue for all tasks - mix of auto and checkpoints as needed...]
|
|
|
|
</tasks>
|
|
|
|
<verification>
|
|
Before declaring phase complete:
|
|
- [ ] [Specific test command]
|
|
- [ ] [Build/type check passes]
|
|
- [ ] [Behavior verification]
|
|
</verification>
|
|
|
|
<success_criteria>
|
|
|
|
- All tasks completed
|
|
- All verification checks pass
|
|
- No errors or warnings introduced
|
|
- [Phase-specific criteria]
|
|
</success_criteria>
|
|
|
|
<output>
|
|
After completion, create `.planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md`:
|
|
|
|
# Phase [X] Plan [Y]: [Name] Summary
|
|
|
|
**[Substantive one-liner - what shipped, not "phase complete"]**
|
|
|
|
## Accomplishments
|
|
|
|
- [Key outcome 1]
|
|
- [Key outcome 2]
|
|
|
|
## Files Created/Modified
|
|
|
|
- `path/to/file.ts` - Description
|
|
- `path/to/another.ts` - Description
|
|
|
|
## Decisions Made
|
|
|
|
[Key decisions and rationale, or "None"]
|
|
|
|
## Issues Encountered
|
|
|
|
[Problems and resolutions, or "None"]
|
|
|
|
## Next Step
|
|
|
|
[If more plans in this phase: "Ready for {phase}-{next-plan}-PLAN.md"]
|
|
[If phase complete: "Phase complete, ready for next phase"]
|
|
</output>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
<key_elements>
|
|
From create-meta-prompts patterns:
|
|
|
|
- XML structure for Claude parsing
|
|
- @context references for file loading
|
|
- Task types: auto, checkpoint:human-action, checkpoint:human-verify, checkpoint:decision
|
|
- Action includes "what to avoid and WHY" (from intelligence-rules)
|
|
- Verification is specific and executable
|
|
- Success criteria is measurable
|
|
- Output specification includes SUMMARY.md structure
|
|
</key_elements>
|
|
|
|
<scope_guidance>
|
|
**Plan sizing:**
|
|
|
|
- Aim for 2-3 tasks per plan
|
|
- If planning >3 tasks, split into multiple plans (01-01, 01-02, etc.)
|
|
- Target ~50% context usage maximum
|
|
- Complex phases: Create 01-01, 01-02, 01-03 plans instead of one large plan
|
|
|
|
**When to split:**
|
|
|
|
- Different subsystems (auth vs API vs UI)
|
|
- Clear dependency boundaries (setup → implement → test)
|
|
- Risk of context overflow (>50% estimated usage)
|
|
- **TDD candidates** - Features that warrant TDD become their own TDD plans
|
|
</scope_guidance>
|
|
|
|
<tdd_plan_note>
|
|
**TDD features get dedicated plans.**
|
|
|
|
TDD requires 2-3 execution cycles (RED → GREEN → REFACTOR) that consume 40-50% context for a single feature. Features warranting TDD (business logic, validation, algorithms, API contracts) each get their own TDD plan.
|
|
|
|
**Heuristic:** Can you write `expect(fn(input)).toBe(output)` before writing `fn`?
|
|
→ Yes: Create a TDD plan (one feature per plan)
|
|
→ No: Standard task in standard plan
|
|
|
|
See `~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/tdd.md` for TDD plan structure.
|
|
</tdd_plan_note>
|
|
|
|
<good_examples>
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
---
|
|
phase: 01-foundation
|
|
type: execute
|
|
domain: next-js
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
<objective>
|
|
Set up Next.js project with authentication foundation.
|
|
|
|
Purpose: Establish the core structure and auth patterns all features depend on.
|
|
Output: Working Next.js app with JWT auth, protected routes, and user model.
|
|
</objective>
|
|
|
|
<execution_context>
|
|
~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md
|
|
./summary.md
|
|
</execution_context>
|
|
|
|
<context>
|
|
@.planning/PROJECT.md
|
|
@.planning/ROADMAP.md
|
|
@src/lib/db.ts
|
|
</context>
|
|
|
|
<tasks>
|
|
|
|
<task type="auto">
|
|
<name>Task 1: Add User model to database schema</name>
|
|
<files>prisma/schema.prisma</files>
|
|
<action>Add User model with fields: id (cuid), email (unique), passwordHash, createdAt, updatedAt. Add Session relation. Use @db.VarChar(255) for email to prevent index issues.</action>
|
|
<verify>npx prisma validate passes, npx prisma generate succeeds</verify>
|
|
<done>Schema valid, types generated, no errors</done>
|
|
</task>
|
|
|
|
<task type="auto">
|
|
<name>Task 2: Create login API endpoint</name>
|
|
<files>src/app/api/auth/login/route.ts</files>
|
|
<action>POST endpoint that accepts {email, password}, validates against User table using bcrypt, returns JWT in httpOnly cookie with 15-min expiry. Use jose library for JWT (not jsonwebtoken - it has CommonJS issues with Next.js).</action>
|
|
<verify>curl -X POST /api/auth/login -d '{"email":"test@test.com","password":"test"}' -H "Content-Type: application/json" returns 200 with Set-Cookie header</verify>
|
|
<done>Valid credentials return 200 + cookie, invalid return 401, missing fields return 400</done>
|
|
</task>
|
|
|
|
</tasks>
|
|
|
|
<verification>
|
|
Before declaring phase complete:
|
|
- [ ] `npm run build` succeeds without errors
|
|
- [ ] `npx prisma validate` passes
|
|
- [ ] Login endpoint responds correctly to valid/invalid credentials
|
|
- [ ] Protected route redirects unauthenticated users
|
|
</verification>
|
|
|
|
<success_criteria>
|
|
|
|
- All tasks completed
|
|
- All verification checks pass
|
|
- No TypeScript errors
|
|
- JWT auth flow works end-to-end
|
|
</success_criteria>
|
|
|
|
<output>
|
|
After completion, create `.planning/phases/01-foundation/01-01-SUMMARY.md`
|
|
</output>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
</good_examples>
|
|
|
|
<bad_examples>
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Phase 1: Foundation
|
|
|
|
## Tasks
|
|
|
|
### Task 1: Set up authentication
|
|
|
|
**Action**: Add auth to the app
|
|
**Done when**: Users can log in
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This is useless. No XML structure, no @context, no verification, no specificity.
|
|
</bad_examples>
|
|
|
|
<guidelines>
|
|
**When to use:**
|
|
- Creating execution plans for each phase
|
|
- One plan per 2-3 tasks, multiple plans per phase if needed
|
|
- Always use XML structure for Claude parsing
|
|
|
|
**Task types:**
|
|
|
|
- `type="auto"`: Execute without stopping
|
|
- `type="checkpoint:human-action"`: User must do something (manual step)
|
|
- `type="checkpoint:human-verify"`: User must verify output (testing, visual check)
|
|
- `type="checkpoint:decision"`: User must choose between options
|
|
|
|
**Gate values:**
|
|
|
|
- `gate="blocking"`: Must resolve before continuing
|
|
- `gate="optional"`: Can skip or defer
|
|
|
|
**Context references:**
|
|
|
|
- Use @path/to/file.md to load files
|
|
- Always include @.planning/PROJECT.md and @.planning/ROADMAP.md
|
|
- Include relevant source files for context
|
|
- Include workflow/template references
|
|
|
|
**After completion:**
|
|
|
|
- Create SUMMARY.md in same directory
|
|
- Follow summary.md template structure
|
|
- Document deviations, decisions, issues
|
|
</guidelines>
|