Files
msd-core/docs/reference/plan-md.md
Cody Anderson 8c9265d4e5 fix(#3724): warning-only Dimension 3b findings no longer force the revision loop (#3758)
* fix(#3724): stop advisory Dimension 3b findings from forcing the revision loop

Dimension 3b (undeclared/temporal coupling, #1954) is spec'd "never a
blocker" but tagged severity: warning — the tier plan-phase's revision
loop counts as must-fix — and the planner is never taught the rule, so
every multi-wave phase touching shared mutable state replans at least
once, and intentionally coupled plans re-flag identically every
iteration to the stall prompt.

Three coordinated changes:
- gsd-plan-checker: retag 3b to severity: info, the tier
  references/revision-loop.md already exempts by design; recognize a
  coupling_justified frontmatter declaration in the Do-NOT-flag list so
  deliberate pairs converge. Additions are offset by trimming 3b
  motivation prose — the checker sits 45 bytes under its LARGE hard cap.
- plan-phase step 12: INFO-only accept — an issues block with zero
  BLOCKER/WARNING entries accepts the plan and surfaces the advisories
  instead of re-entering the revision loop. Real blockers and warnings
  still gate unconditionally.
- gsd-planner: slim pointer in assign_waves to the new
  progressive-disclosure reference gsd-core/references/planner-coupling.md
  (the planner sits 19 chars under its own cap), which carries the
  shared-mutable-state rule and the coupling_justified escape hatch so
  first-pass plans avoid the finding when the coupling is unintentional.

Documented the coupling_justified field in docs/reference/plan-md.md.
Growth acks per #2914; inventory manifest and install-tree fixtures
regenerated for the new reference file.

Closes #3724

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* test(#3724): pin Dimension 3b at severity: info

The severity retag makes the old assertion (severity: warning) stale;
lock the advisory tier from both directions — info must be present,
warning must not — so a future edit cannot silently re-arm the
revision-loop trigger.

Refs #3724

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* chore(#3724): changeset fragment for PR #3758

Refs #3724

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* docs(#3724): roster planner-coupling.md in docs/INVENTORY.md

The new reference was enumerated in the manifest and all 19 install-tree
fixtures but missing its row in the Modular Planner Decomposition table —
the roster half the manifest-sync test cannot check. (Review Blocker.)

Refs #3724

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* test(#3724): cover all four acceptance criteria (review round 1)

- plan-checker-coupling: the 3b severity assertion is now a PARITY check
  deriving the exempt tier from revision-loop.md's flow instead of
  hardcoding info — editing either side alone reds the suite. New
  describe pins the other three criteria: plan-phase's INFO-only accept
  clause (proven failing-first), the BLOCKER + WARNING count staying
  intact, the coupling_justified Do-NOT-flag exemption + fix_hint, and
  the planner pointer + planner-coupling.md content.
- ack fragment: $comment's plan-phase figure corrected to +79B; the 2775
  pin note carried forward into the gsd-planner.md entry, updated for
  upstream's #3761/#3764 Rule-paragraph anchor (which this diff leaves
  verbatim).

The parallel-dependent-plans re-anchor this commit originally carried was
superseded by upstream #3764 during review; this branch no longer touches
that file.

Refs #3724

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* fix(#3724): review round 2 — align the stance enumeration, complete the template contract

MAJOR: <adversarial_stance>'s severity enumeration gains the INFO bullet so it
agrees with Dimension 3b's 'ALWAYS INFO' mandate instead of contradicting it.
Funded by extracting the inline <examples> block to the new progressive-
disclosure reference gsd-core/references/plan-checker-examples.md (@-inlined
from the same spot; #1949 precedent), which also restores the 3b motivation
clause round 1 traded away (Nit 4) and nets the agent file SMALLER than base
(49107 -> 48486) — the extraction the byte pressure was owed.

MINOR: gsd-core/templates/phase-prompt.md now carries coupling_justified, and
the field's shape becomes one 'plan-id: reason' string per coupled peer so a
plan justified against two peers can express it; docs/reference/plan-md.md's
Type column names the shape.

NIT: the 3409 ack's plan-phase entry no longer calls the #1168 workflow
ratchet an 'XL tier'.

Acks and derived artifacts updated accordingly (checker entry removed — a
shrink needs no ack; INVENTORY roster row + regen:derived for the new file).

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* test(#3724): derive the 3b negative severity assertion (review round 2)

Every severity token in the 3b span must BE the tier revision-loop.md exempts,
replacing the hardcoded severity:warning negative — if the loop's exemption
ever moves, the failure names the real conflict instead of blaming the agent
file with a mutually-unsatisfiable pair.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* fix(#3724): refit the planner coupling pointer under the char cap

Upstream #3299 (PR #3390) grew agents/gsd-planner.md to 49146 chars at the
base, leaving 5 chars of headroom where the +16-char pointer was measured
against 13 more. The pointer prose shortens to 'Non-file coupling:' —
49150 chars, back under the strict 49152-char cap — and the ack figures
follow. The @-path the tests pin is unchanged.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* fix(#3724): re-home the plan-phase ack after the #3823 spent-fragment sweep

Upstream #3078/#3823 deleted all fully-spent ack fragments, including
3409-unreachable-guard-arms.json, which carried this PR's plan-phase.md
+79B append. Per the collision remedy that sweep added: take the deletion
and home the still-live entry in this PR's own fragment. Figures
re-measured at this merge base (90871 -> 90950 LF bytes).

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* fix(#3724): absorb the spent #3172 plan-phase fragment into this PR's ack

Upstream #3825 shipped 3172-stated-failing-direction.json naming only
plan-phase.md, now spent at the base — colliding with this PR's live
plan-phase entry. Per the #3003 pattern the fully-spent single-path
fragment is deleted and this fragment stays the path's one source;
figures re-measured at this base (93073 -> 93152 LF bytes).

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* fix(#3724): review round 3 — true up the ack figures, restore the wave comment

The fragment's absolute sizes are re-measured and anchored to base
e40e9670 (planner 47259 -> 47330 chars, checker 45537 -> 44916 B,
plan-phase 91186 -> 91265 LF bytes), with a note that absolutes rot as
next moves — the deltas are the durable claims. The round-1 removal of
the '# Implicit dependency: files_modified overlap forces a later wave.'
pseudocode comment offset headroom base drift had already returned, so
it is restored (findings 2-3). Changeset gains the (#3724) backlink
(finding 4).

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* fix(#3724): review round 4 — close the verify-work surface, harden the boundaries

BLOCKER: verify-work.md's verify_gap_plans is the second multi-plan
consumer of the checker's sentinels, and its ISSUES FOUND handler entered
revision_loop with zero severity parsing — the guaranteed replan #3724
fixed in plan-phase, alive on the gap-closure surface. The handler now
counts BLOCKER + WARNING and accepts INFO-only returns with advisories
displayed. The checker's INFO stance bullet is reworded to the claim that
is true everywhere ('revision gates count only BLOCKER + WARNING').

Minor 1: plan-phase's iteration_count >= 3 arm recounts severities, so an
INFO-only third check accepts instead of halting on a '0 issues remain'
user gate. Minor 2: the coupling_justified exemption now requires the
entry to NAME the other plan, closing the blanket-suppression reading.
Nit 1: INVENTORY row states the extraction buys cap headroom, not context.
Nit 2: the advisory display gains a concrete format on both surfaces.

Ack fragment re-anchored at base ddde001a: verify-work.md +264B (new
entry), plan-phase.md +395B, checker still net negative (-512B).

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* test(#3724): pin the verify-work accept and the iteration-cap boundary (review round 4)

Two wiring assertions: verify_gap_plans' ISSUES FOUND handler gates on
BLOCKER + WARNING and accepts INFO-only blocks, and plan-phase's
iteration_count >= 3 arm recounts severities instead of gating advisories
— the limit+1 boundary of the gate this PR fixes.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* fix(#3724): review round 5 — fail closed at the gates, surface the advisory

Blocker 1: the checker's step-10 status rule routes an INFO-only result to
## ISSUES FOUND (with a new ### Advisories (info) template section and a
severity-aware recommendation) so the orchestrator receives the block and
displays the advisory instead of silently accepting a bare PASSED.

Blockers 2+3: all three gate surfaces (plan-phase step 12 both arms,
verify-work verify_gap_plans) carry one canonical clause verbatim — an entry
whose severity is missing or unrecognized counts as a BLOCKER (fail closed) —
making the accept condition an explicit-INFO whitelist while keeping
issue_count coherent for stall math.

Major 1: the INFO stance bullet scopes its claim to the plan-phase and
verify-work gates (quick mode's loop still revises on any ISSUES FOUND).
Major 2: INVENTORY row and ack $comment state the extraction's real trade
(readability, +0.6 KB eager runtime context), not a cap remedy.
Minor 1: plan-md.md marks coupling_justified as prompt convention, unvalidated.
Nit 1: ack absolutes re-anchored at base 1e67ec97; checker now +120B and acked.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* test(#3724): pin the round-5 contract — fail-closed parity, INFO-only return shape

New: three-surface verbatim parity test for the fail-closed clause (Blockers
2+3); checker return-contract test for the INFO-only ## ISSUES FOUND route and
advisories section (Blocker 1). All seven newly pinned tokens are absent at
f3a5682d, so each new assertion fails pre-fix.

Updated: accept-clause regexes track the explicit-INFO whitelist wording;
the severity sweep scopes to the span's fenced yaml examples via
yamlSeverityTiers (round-5 Minor 3, applied to the blocker negative too);
the iteration-cap comment states it is a prose pin, not an executed boundary
check (Minor 4); splitLines call sites document the line-pin coupling (Nit 2).

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* fix(#3724): adopt next's line wrap in the 3b motivation clause — drops a wrap-only hunk from the diff

Byte-identical content; the wrap difference was an artifact of the round-1
base adaptation predating upstream's #3003 landing.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

* fix(#3724): review round 7 — gate every checker consumer, not just the two audited ones

Blocker: quick/steps/plan-checker-loop.md (issue-named in #3724) gets the
same canonical fail-closed clause and explicit-INFO whitelist accept as
plan-phase/verify-work — an INFO-only result proceeds instead of entering
quick mode's revision loop.
Major: import.md plan_validate handles the checker return by severity
(INFO-only never blocks an import) and is added to agent-contracts.md's
consumer enumeration, which had omitted it.
The checker's INFO stance bullet drops the quick-mode carve-out — the claim
is universally true again now that every consuming gate is severity-aware.
Minor: an applied coupling_justified exemption is surfaced as its own info
advisory so a stale one-sided declaration stays observable.
Nit: plan-phase's revision-iteration Display line is explicitly conditioned
on not having already proceeded to step 13.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: import.md — #3724 round 7: the plan_validate step's checker-return handler becomes severity-aware — counts BLOCKER + WARNING failing closed and accepts an explicitly-INFO-only return with advisories displayed instead of blocking the import

* test(#3724): pin the round-7 surfaces — five-gate parity, quick/import accepts, exemption visibility

The verbatim fail-closed parity test extends to quick/steps/plan-checker-loop.md
and import.md plan_validate; new assertions pin quick mode's INFO-only proceed,
import's never-blocks accept, import.md's presence in agent-contracts.md's
consumer row, and the surfaced coupling_justified exemption advisory. All four
newly pinned token families are absent at the pre-fix head, so each new
assertion fails first.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GshUzpGjoxiw6uNRiFMHvM

---------

Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>
2026-08-31 19:08:11 -04:00

349 lines
26 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# PLAN.md schema reference
A per-plan `PLAN.md` is GSD Core's executable unit of work — a structured document that tells an executor agent exactly what to build and how to verify it was built correctly. This page documents its structure. See [docs index](../README.md).
---
## Overview
Plans live inside phase directories at:
```
.planning/phases/<NN>-<slug>/<NN>-<PP>-PLAN.md
```
For example: `.planning/phases/03-post-feed/03-02-PLAN.md` (Phase 3, Plan 2).
Plans are produced by the `gsd-planner` agent (spawned by `/gsd-plan-phase`) and consumed by `execute-phase`. A phase typically contains between one and four plans; plans within a phase are assigned to execution waves so that independent work runs in parallel.
---
## YAML frontmatter
Every PLAN.md opens with a YAML frontmatter block between `---` delimiters.
### Annotated example
```yaml
---
phase: 03-post-feed
plan: 02
type: execute
wave: 2
depends_on: ["03-01"]
files_modified:
- src/components/PostFeed.tsx
- src/components/PostCard.tsx
- src/app/feed/page.tsx
files_deleted:
- src/components/LegacyFeed.tsx
autonomous: true
requirements: ["FEED-01", "FEED-03"]
user_setup: []
must_haves:
truths:
- "User can scroll through posts from followed accounts"
- "Each post shows author avatar, name, timestamp, and content"
- "Empty state appears when no posts exist"
artifacts:
- path: "src/components/PostFeed.tsx"
provides: "Scrollable post list"
min_lines: 40
- path: "src/components/PostCard.tsx"
provides: "Individual post card"
exports: ["PostCard"]
key_links:
- from: "src/components/PostFeed.tsx"
to: "src/app/api/feed/route.ts"
via: "fetch in useEffect — calls /api/feed endpoint"
pattern: "fetch.*api/feed"
---
```
### Frontmatter field reference
| Field | Required | Type | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| `phase` | Yes | string | Phase identifier, e.g. `03-post-feed`. |
| `plan` | Yes | string | Plan number within the phase, e.g. `02`. |
| `type` | Yes | `execute` or `tdd` | `execute` for standard plans; `tdd` for test-driven plans where tests are written before implementation. |
| `wave` | Yes | integer | Execution wave. Plans in wave 1 run in parallel (no dependencies). Plans in wave 2+ wait for all plans in the previous wave to complete. Pre-computed at plan time by `gsd-planner`. |
| `depends_on` | Yes | array of plan IDs | Plans this plan must wait for. Empty array = wave 1. Accepts three forms, resolved in order: the full plan id (`"03-01-auth-hardening"`), the canonical phase-plan prefix (`"03-01"`), or the bare plan number (`"01"`, #3897) — which resolves to the sibling plan in the **same phase** whose canonical id ends `-01`. The bare form is in-phase only; it never resolves across phases. If two plans in the same phase share a bare form, the first one (by sorted plan-file order) wins — deterministic, but arbitrary when the collision happens, so prefer the full or canonical form when phase has any short-form collision risk. Example: `["03-01"]` means this plan runs after Plan 01 in Phase 3; from within Phase 3 itself, `["01"]` means the same thing. |
| `files_modified` | Yes | array of paths | Every file this plan creates or modifies. Used by the plan-checker to detect same-wave file conflicts and by execute-phase for merge tracking. |
| `files_deleted` | No | array of paths | Every file this plan deliberately **removes**. The post-wave cleanup gauntlet blocks the merge of any executor branch whose diff deletes a file — a net against a mass-deletion accident — and this field is the opt-in that names the exceptions. Matching is exact per path after separator normalization: a declared path merges, an undeclared one still blocks that plan's entry (and only that entry). There are no globs and no directory prefixes, so a declaration can never authorize more than it literally lists. Omit the field and the guard's original unconditional block stays in force, which is why absence is always the safe default (#3003). Counts toward same-wave conflict detection alongside `files_modified`: a plan deleting a file another plan in the same wave is editing is the sharpest conflict there is — one branch removes what the other is writing — so the two plans are pushed into different waves regardless of which side holds the deletion. |
| `coupling_justified` | No | array of `"plan-id: reason"` strings | One entry per deliberately coupled same-wave peer, e.g. `["03-02: both append independent config keys"]` — declares that the coupling with that plan through a shared mutable resource (config key, table, migration, env var) is deliberate and order-independent. The plan-checker's Dimension 3b recognizes the declaration and does not flag the pair, so intentionally coupled plans can pass verification without serializing waves. The `"plan-id: reason"` shape is a prompt-level convention read by the checker, not a schema — the plan parser (`src/plan-document.cts`) neither validates nor rejects the field, so a typo'd plan-id silently exempts nothing (#3724). |
| `autonomous` | Yes | boolean | `true` when all tasks are type `auto`. `false` when the plan contains any `checkpoint:*` task that requires human interaction. |
| `requirements` | Yes | array of IDs | Requirement IDs from ROADMAP.md that this plan addresses. Every phase requirement ID must appear in at least one plan's `requirements` field. Empty arrays are a BLOCKER. |
| `user_setup` | No | array of objects | External-service setup steps that Claude cannot automate (account creation, secret retrieval, dashboard configuration). When present, execute-phase generates a `USER-SETUP.md` checklist for the developer. |
| `status` | No | `superseded` | Marks a plan that was deliberately reassigned or abandoned mid-phase and will never be executed. A `status: superseded` plan is excluded from the phase's plan and summary counts, so it never holds the phase below 100%. See [Superseded plans](#superseded-plans). Any other value (or the field's absence) has no effect on counting. |
| `estimate` | No | object | Projected execution cost: `{tokens, raw_tokens, tasks, confidence}` (#2631, [ADR-2629](../adr/2629-phase-effort-estimation-calibration.md)). `tokens` is an `estimateTokens`-scale projection with the project's calibration factor **already applied** (which is why the plan-checker passes `--calibrated` to `estimate-check` — re-applying it would square the correction); `confidence` (`low`/`med`/`high`) is **derived from the calibration sample count, never self-rated**. Additive and optional — a plan without it behaves exactly as before. A plan estimated above `workflow.smart_zone_tokens` is flagged with a split recommendation at plan time; the flag is advisory and never blocks. |
| `must_haves` | Yes | object | Goal-backward verification criteria. See below. |
| `agent_hint` | No | string | Per-plan specialist executor routing (#1689). Name of a subagent that shares the `gsd-executor` execution contract (reads `execute-plan.md`, atomic-commit protocol). When the named agent resolves on the active runtime (an agent file exists in the runtime's agent dir), `execute-phase` dispatches it instead of `gsd-executor`. Unset/unresolved → `gsd-executor`, byte-identical to today. Default-on via `workflow.agent_hint_routing`; set `false` to disable. See [Per-plan executor routing](#per-plan-executor-routing). |
| `gap_closure` | Only in gap-closure mode | string, exact match | Must be exactly the literal lowercase `true` — validated as a string comparison, not a YAML boolean, so `True`, `TRUE`, `yes`, and `1` are all rejected. Required on every plan generated by `/gsd-plan-phase --gaps`, checked by the `plan-gap-closure` schema (`src/frontmatter.cts`) rather than `plan`. `/gsd-execute-phase --gaps-only` filters strictly on this field, so an omitted or wrong-valued `gap_closure` on a gap-closure plan means it is silently skipped — zero executors spawned, no error (#2847). Standard and reviews-mode plans validate against the unmodified `plan` schema, which neither requires nor checks this field (nothing rejects it as an extra field either, if present). |
### Per-plan executor routing
A plan can opt into a **specialist executor** by setting `agent_hint:` to the name of a subagent that shares the `gsd-executor` execution contract — it reads `execute-plan.md`, follows the atomic-commit protocol, and carries Read/Edit/Write/Bash. A Flutter specialist, for example:
```yaml
---
agent_hint: well-me-flutter-engineer
---
```
At dispatch, `execute-phase` resolves the hint against the **active runtime's agent directory** (both project-local and user-global, across the runtime's filename variants — `.md`, `.agent.md`, `.toml`, …) and dispatches the named subagent via `subagent_type`. If the field is absent, blank, or the named agent does not resolve, the plan dispatches to `gsd-executor` — byte-identical to behavior without the field. Routing is gated by `workflow.agent_hint_routing` (default-on; see [CONFIGURATION](../CONFIGURATION.md#workflow-toggles)).
The specialist agent is an ordinary agent file (e.g. `agents/well-me-flutter-engineer.md` on Claude Code); there is no separate registration manifest.
### Superseded plans
A phase reads complete when every `*-PLAN.md` has a matching `*-SUMMARY.md`. When a plan is reassigned or dropped mid-phase — its work folded into a later plan — it will never gain a summary, and without a marker it would pin the phase below 100% forever (the plan-level analogue of a retired phase). Add `status: superseded` to that plan's frontmatter to exclude it from **both** the plan count (denominator) and the summary count (numerator):
```yaml
---
phase: 05-api
plan: "12"
type: execute
status: superseded
---
```
A phase with 13 plans, two of them `superseded`, then reads `11/11 → complete` — no fabricated summary required. The match is case-insensitive. Plans without the marker are counted exactly as before.
---
## `must_haves` field
`must_haves` captures what must be observably true for the phase goal to be achieved. It is derived during planning and verified after execution by the `gsd-verifier` agent.
### Sub-fields
| Sub-field | Type | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| `truths` | array of strings | Observable behaviours from the user's perspective. Each must be verifiable. Example: `"User can send a message"`, not `"WebSocket library installed"`. |
| `artifacts` | array of objects | Files that must exist with substantive implementation (not stubs). |
| `artifacts[].path` | string | File path relative to project root. |
| `artifacts[].provides` | string | What capability this file delivers. |
| `artifacts[].min_lines` | integer (optional) | Minimum line count to be considered non-stub. |
| `artifacts[].exports` | array of strings (optional) | Expected named exports to verify. |
| `artifacts[].contains` | string (optional) | Regex or literal pattern that must appear in the file. |
| `key_links` | array of objects | Critical connections between artifacts — the wiring that makes the system work end-to-end. |
| `key_links[].from` | string | Source file (relative path from project root). Must be a literal file path — describe components or symbols in `via:`. |
| `key_links[].to` | string | Target file (relative path from project root). Must be a literal file path — describe endpoints, modules, or APIs in `via:`. |
| `key_links[].via` | string | Description of how they connect, including any endpoint, component, or symbol name (e.g. `fetch in useEffect — calls /api/feed`, `Prisma query via prisma.message`, `import`). |
| `key_links[].pattern` | string (optional) | Regex to verify the connection exists in source. |
---
## Body structure
After frontmatter, the plan body uses named XML-style blocks read by the executor agent.
### `<objective>`
States what the plan delivers and why it matters for the project:
```xml
<objective>
Implement the post feed as a scrollable card list.
Purpose: Core display feature for the social feed phase.
Output: PostFeed and PostCard components wired to /api/feed.
</objective>
```
### `<execution_context>`
Lists the workflow files associated with executing the plan. Always includes the execute-plan workflow; adds the checkpoints reference when the plan contains checkpoint tasks:
```xml
<execution_context>
@~/.claude/gsd-core/workflows/execute-plan.md
@~/.claude/gsd-core/templates/summary.md
</execution_context>
```
These `@` paths point at the local GSD install, not at repository files. The prefix shown here (`~/.claude/gsd-core/…`) is the Claude global-install location; other runtimes and local installs resolve to their own install directory — for example `.cursor/gsd-core/…`, or an absolute project path for a `--local` install. Because the prefix is install-relative, this block is not clone-portable: a committed plan carries whichever prefix the authoring install had. Execution does not depend on it — `/gsd-execute-phase` loads the execute-plan workflow from its own installed copy — so the block records the execution context rather than resolvable repository references. Contrast `<context>` (below), whose repository-relative `@` paths resolve after a `git clone`.
### `<context>`
References source files the executor needs to read. Includes project-level planning docs and any source files whose patterns or types the plan must replicate. Prior plan `SUMMARY.md` files are included only when there is a genuine dependency (imported types, shared decision) — not reflexively:
```xml
<context>
@.planning/PROJECT.md
@.planning/ROADMAP.md
@.planning/STATE.md
@src/components/UserCard.tsx
</context>
```
### `<tasks>`
Contains one or more `<task>` elements. Every task element must carry `<name>`, `<files>`, `<read_first>`, `<action>`, `<verify>`, `<acceptance_criteria>`, and `<done>` for `type="auto"` and `type="tracer"` tasks. Optional `<precondition>` (see [Preconditions](#preconditions)) and `<reversibility>` (see [Reversibility](#reversibility)) elements may sit between `<name>` and `<files>`.
---
## Preconditions
`<precondition>` is an **optional** element on `<task>` (issue #1949, *The Pragmatic Programmer* Topic 23 — Design by Contract). It states, in a single line of runnable/checkable prose, what must already be true for the task to begin safely. It closes the front-of-task side of the contract triad — preconditions (before) ↔ postconditions (`<verify>`/`<done>`/`<acceptance_criteria>`, after) ↔ invariants (`must_haves.truths`, across the whole plan).
```xml
<task type="auto">
<name>Add /reveal endpoint handler</name>
<precondition>server bootstraps and responds to GET /health (from the tracer slice)</precondition>
<files>server/reveal.ts</files>
<action>…</action>
<verify>curl /reveal?path=… opens the OS file manager</verify>
<done>Endpoint committed and manually verified</done>
</task>
```
**Optional and back-compat:** a plan that omits `<precondition>` on every task behaves exactly as today — the executor skips the check with no visible change. Adding `<precondition>` to a task tells the executor to assert it before any other task work (read-only checks only: file existence, env var presence, idempotent health pings; no side-effecting checks — halt and surface a checkpoint if one seems required) and halt (returning a `checkpoint:human-verify`, no partial commit) on an unmet precondition. Plans that include `<precondition>` pass `verify plan-structure` unchanged — the structural validator checks for the presence of required tags and does not reject unknown optional tags.
**Emission cases** (planner-side): emit `<precondition>` only when a task relies on state the plan's own `depends_on` ordering does not already guarantee. Three cases cover every legitimate use:
1. **External service setup** (`user_setup` frontmatter) — the consuming task ties a specific setup step to itself so the executor halts if the setup was skipped.
2. **Prior-phase artifact dependency** — a generated schema, a migration's dist output, a contract file from an earlier phase. Cross-phase `depends_on` does not cross phase boundaries, so `<precondition>` is the explicit pointer.
3. **Environment variable / runtime configuration** — a tool, API, or script the task invokes requires an env var or runtime config that exists *now*, not at plan time.
Full emission rules, anti-patterns ("the system is ready" is not checkable; do not use `<precondition>` for intra-plan sequencing — that is what `depends_on` is for), and the contract triad mapping: see `gsd-core/references/planner-preconditions.md`.
---
## Reversibility
`<reversibility>` is an **optional** element on `<task>` (issue #1951, *The Pragmatic Programmer* Topic 15 — "Reversibility"). It records how costly the decision the task implements would be to undo, so a one-way-door choice gets a human beat before the agent walks through it. The `rating` attribute carries the classification; the body carries a one-line rationale.
```xml
<task type="auto">
<name>Define the on-disk event log format</name>
<reversibility rating="one-way">Phases 4-6 read this file; changing the
format after they land requires a migration for every existing project.</reversibility>
<files>src/event-log.cts</files>
<action>…</action>
<verify><automated>npm run test:unit -- event-log</automated></verify>
<done>Format documented and written by the writer under test</done>
</task>
```
| Rating | Meaning | Effect on the plan |
|---|---|---|
| `reversible` | Undo is local and cheap. | None. This is the default when no rating is given. |
| `costly` | Undo touches many call sites or needs a coordinated change. | Flagged in the plan so the reader sees the weight. Never blocks. |
| `one-way` | Undo requires a migration, breaks a published contract, or is impossible. | The planner inserts a `checkpoint:decision` immediately **before** the dependent task. |
**Optional and back-compat:** a plan that omits `<reversibility>` on every task behaves exactly as today — no flag, no checkpoint. Plans that include it pass `verify plan-structure` unchanged; the structural validator checks for the presence of required tags and does not reject unknown optional tags.
**Autonomy:** inserting a `checkpoint:decision` means the plan contains a checkpoint, so its frontmatter must set `autonomous: false`.
**Override:** `/gsd-plan-phase --no-reversibility-gates` (`REVERSIBILITY_GATES=false`) suppresses checkpoint insertion for intentionally-unattended runs. Ratings are still recorded and `costly` items are still flagged — the override changes what stops the run, not what the plan remembers.
Full taxonomy, emission rules, and anti-patterns (chiefly: rating everything `one-way` produces checkpoint fatigue; prefer *removing* irreversibility over gating it): see `gsd-core/references/planner-reversibility.md`.
---
## Task types
| Type | Use | Autonomy |
|---|---|---|
| `auto` | Everything the executor can do independently. | Fully autonomous. |
| `tracer` | The leading thin end-to-end slice a plan starts with by default (tracer-first) — production-quality, wired through every layer, with a real end-to-end `<verify>`. | Fully autonomous; after committing, the executor runs the tracer's `<verify>` as an early integration gate. A tracer carrying `gate="blocking-human"` STOPs for a human in every mode, auto included. Otherwise autonomous runs halt on failure before expansion, and interactive runs honor `workflow.human_verify_mode` (#3299): under the `end-of-phase` default a `<verify>` carrying only `<automated>` is re-run and, on success, expansion continues with **no** checkpoint (failure still halts); under `mid-flight`, or when the tracer carries `<human-check>`, a `checkpoint:human-verify` is presented. Full precedence chain: `gsd-core/references/checkpoints.md` → "Tracer feedback gate". |
| `checkpoint:human-verify` | Visual or functional verification that requires a human to look at a running UI or service. | Pauses execution; presents to the developer; resumes on approval. |
| `checkpoint:decision` | Implementation choices that arose during execution and require the developer's input. | Pauses execution; presents options; resumes on selection. |
| `checkpoint:human-action` | Truly unavoidable manual steps (account creation, hardware interaction). Used sparingly. | Pauses execution; resumes on confirmation. |
Plans that contain any checkpoint task must set `autonomous: false` in frontmatter.
---
## `auto` task structure
```xml
<task type="auto">
<name>Task 1: Create PostCard component</name>
<files>src/components/PostCard.tsx</files>
<read_first>src/components/UserCard.tsx, src/types/post.ts</read_first>
<action>Create PostCard component accepting a Post prop (id, authorId, content, createdAt,
reactionCount). Render author avatar using UserAvatar from UserCard pattern. Show timestamp
using date-fns formatDistanceToNow. Export as named export PostCard.</action>
<verify>npx tsc --noEmit</verify>
<acceptance_criteria>
- src/components/PostCard.tsx exports named export PostCard
- PostCard.tsx contains "reactionCount" prop usage
- npx tsc --noEmit exits 0
</acceptance_criteria>
<done>PostCard renders post content with author and timestamp</done>
</task>
```
### Required fields for `auto` tasks
| Field | Rule |
|---|---|
| `<files>` | Every file the task creates or modifies. The executor writes only these files. |
| `<read_first>` | Files the executor must read before touching anything — the file being modified, any source-of-truth pattern file, any file whose types or conventions must be replicated. |
| `<action>` | Concrete instructions with exact identifiers, file paths, function signatures, and expected values. Never says "align X with Y" without specifying the target state. Never contains fenced code blocks or full implementations. |
| `<verify>` | A runnable command or check that proves the task succeeded. Must distinguish pass from fail — `echo "done"` is not valid. Accepts either the wrapped form (`<verify><automated>cmd</automated></verify>`) or the legacy bare-text form (`<verify>cmd</verify>`); both are valid. **On a `type="tracer"` task, prefer the wrapped form:** the tracer feedback gate's auto-continue (#3299) requires a `<verify>` carrying only `<automated>`, so a bare-text tracer verify falls through to the STOP fallback and still presents a `checkpoint:human-verify` in interactive runs even under `end-of-phase`. |
| `<acceptance_criteria>` | Verifiable conditions: grep-verifiable strings, command exit codes, observable behaviours. No subjective language ("looks correct", "properly configured"). Negative greps (`! grep -Eq 'PAT' file`) are file-scoped — region-scope them (`sed -n`/`awk` range, then grep) when a sibling task needs the construct elsewhere in the same file (#968). |
| `<done>` | A short measurable statement of the completed outcome. |
---
## Plan quality dimensions
The `gsd-plan-checker` agent reviews every PLAN.md across 12 dimensions before execution begins. A plan that fails any BLOCKER-severity check is returned to `gsd-planner` for revision (up to 3 iterations):
| Dimension | What it checks |
|---|---|
| **1 — Requirement Coverage** | Every phase requirement ID from ROADMAP.md appears in at least one plan's `requirements` frontmatter field and has covering task(s). |
| **2 — Task Completeness** | Every `auto` task carries all required fields (`<files>`, `<action>`, `<verify>`, `<acceptance_criteria>`, `<done>`). No vague or empty fields. |
| **3 — Dependency Correctness** | `depends_on` references are valid, acyclic, and consistent with wave numbers. Wave N plan depends only on plans in waves < N. |
| **4 — Key Links Planned** | Artifacts in `must_haves.key_links` have corresponding tasks that implement the wiring — not just the artifact creation. |
| **5 — Scope Sanity** | Plans stay within context budget: 2–3 tasks per plan (4 = warning, 5+ = BLOCKER), ≤ 8–10 files per plan (15+ = BLOCKER). |
| **6 — Verification Derivation** | `must_haves.truths` are user-observable behaviours, not implementation details. Artifacts map to truths. Key links cover critical wiring. |
| **7 — Context Compliance** | Every `D-NN` decision from CONTEXT.md is addressed by at least one task. No task implements anything from `<deferred>`. |
| **7b — Scope Reduction Detection** | Task actions do not silently reduce a locked decision to a "v1", "stub", or "future enhancement" without delivering the full decision scope. Always a BLOCKER when found. |
| **7c — Architectural Tier Compliance** | Tasks assign capabilities to the correct tier per the RESEARCH.md Architectural Responsibility Map (when present). Security-sensitive capabilities in the wrong tier are BLOCKERs. |
| **8 — Nyquist Compliance** | When `workflow.nyquist_validation` is enabled and RESEARCH.md exists, every task has an `<automated>` verify command, no consecutive window of 3 tasks lacks coverage, and VALIDATION.md is present. |
| **9 — Cross-Plan Data Contracts** | When plans share data pipelines, their transformations are compatible — no plan strips data that another plan needs in original form. |
| **10 — CLAUDE.md Compliance** | Plans respect project-specific conventions, forbidden patterns, required tools, and security requirements from `./CLAUDE.md`. |
| **11 — Research Resolution** | When RESEARCH.md exists, its `## Open Questions` section is marked `(RESOLVED)` before planning proceeds. |
| **12 — Pattern Compliance** | When PATTERNS.md exists, tasks reference the correct analog patterns for each new or modified file. |
---
## Wave execution model
Wave numbers are pre-computed during planning. Execute-phase groups plans by wave number and runs each wave's plans in parallel:
```
Wave 1: Plan 01, Plan 02, Plan 03 (all run simultaneously — no dependencies)
Wave 2: Plan 04 (waits for Wave 1 to complete)
Wave 3: Plan 05 (waits for Wave 2 to complete)
```
Plans within a wave that modify overlapping files must not be in the same wave — the plan-checker's Dimension 3 flags this as a BLOCKER.
---
## Plan output
After a plan executes successfully, the executor writes a SUMMARY.md at:
```
.planning/phases/<NN>-<slug>/<NN>-<PP>-SUMMARY.md
```
The SUMMARY.md is the canonical record of what was built. Subsequent plans in the same phase may reference it when they have a genuine dependency on its types or decisions.
---
## Related
- [CONTEXT.md schema](context-md.md)
- [Planning artifacts](planning-artifacts.md)
- [Features](../FEATURES.md)
- [docs index](../README.md)