Files
msd-core/gsd-core/workflows/progress.md
Tom Boucher ff4a57b78c chore(#1671): migrate the remaining 13 LARGE/XL workflows to the fragment model — Phase 6.3 (#3030)
* chore(#2994): fragmentize progress.md forensic audit onto the fragment model

Extract the --forensic-gated forensic_audit step to
workflows/progress/steps/forensic-audit.md behind a section marker, and
repair progress.md's init line to forward --forensic so the atom is
actually true in production rather than only under direct CLI tests.

progress.md shrinks 32630 -> 27207 bytes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize the four manifest-wired workflows

new-project, quick, new-milestone and progress each already had a
dedicated cmdInit* entry point but zero marked sections. Extract nine
gated bodies to workflows/<wf>/steps/ behind section markers and repair
each init line to forward its flags.

Fold --full into the discuss/research/validate facts inside cmdInitQuick
so the when= grammar never sees an OR, per the chunked-mode precedent.

Fixes found while working, per the no-defer rule:
- cmdInitProgress passed no phase info to buildSectionManifestField, so
  state:phase-mvp-mode was permanently false — an atom in the vocabulary
  whose fact could never be computed.
- the quick init router folded flag tokens into the free-text
  description, which the new forwarding would have corrupted.
- a #2508 dispatch note was nested inside quick.md's Agent(prompt=)
  fence, leaking orchestrator guidance into the subagent prompt.
- progress.md had a 3-vs-4 backtick outer-fence imbalance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize verify-work.md and admit state:ui-phase-active

Wire cmdInitVerifyWork to buildSectionManifestField — it was a dedicated
entry point that never emitted a manifest — and mark two sections.

state:ui-phase-active folds (plan:pre hooks include an active ui step) OR
(the phase dir holds a *-UI-SPEC.md) into one boolean in init.cts, so the
grammar still sees a single operator-free atom. The inner Playwright-MCP
check stays as prose inside the fragment: it is live session state and no
init seam can precompute it.

The MVP false-branch note is a real fallback, not redundant prose, so it
sits outside the marker — gating it away would delete the text needed
precisely when MVP mode is off.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#2994): follow moved workflow content in drift guards

Retarget every guard that asserted on content this branch moved into
workflows/<wf>/steps/, mirroring 815b3d897. Each retargeted assertion was
verified to still fail when its step file is blanked, so none was
weakened into vacuity.

Three assertions in verify-mvp-uat were genuinely red. Three more were
worse than red — passing for the wrong reason:
- quick-commit-boundary and worktree-cleanup anchored on indexOf('Step
  5.6'), which matched a later cross-reference and sliced 16069 chars
  that coincidentally held the asserted substrings. Replaced with an
  expandWorkflowSections helper that splices step content back in place.
- phase6-review-capabilities lost its end boundary and widened to EOF.
- playwright-ui-verify matched 'UI' in an unrelated bullet and 'fall
  back' in a subagent-dispatch line after the real content moved.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize code-review and complete-milestone, admit three atoms

Add dedicated cmdInitCodeReview and cmdInitCompleteMilestone entry points
alongside the shared generic ones rather than modifying them — init.phase-op
and init.manager carry a CRITICAL blast radius (179 dependents, 24
processes) and stay byte-identical for their other callers.

Admit flag:--fix, state:fallow-enabled and state:git-create-tag, each with
a consuming section and a fact its own entry point computes.

Both sections had the resolver-in-body hazard: the fallow config-gate and
the git.create_tag check each sat inside the very block being gated, so
gating would have disabled the resolver that decides the gate. Both are
hoisted into init and the bodies now consume the resolved fact.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#2994): retarget code-review and milestone drift guards, fix two red tests

Retarget guards that asserted on content moved into steps/, proving
non-vacuity by blanking each step file and confirming failure.

Also fixes two genuinely red tests found while working, per the no-defer
rule:
- workflow-fragments' frozen-vocabulary lock was missing
  state:ui-phase-active, so commit 7ef7f8336 shipped red. Lint and build
  both passed over it, which is why neither is sufficient verification.
- code-review's quick.md capability-hook assertion carried a stale
  delimiter after the 18ff35d20 extraction.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize autonomous.md and admit state:plan-strategy-converge

Five sections share one atom, the pattern plan-phase already uses for
flag:--research-phase. The atom folds --converge OR --cross-ai into a
single boolean in cmdInitAutonomous so the grammar stays operator-free.

cmdInitAutonomous is additive; init.milestone-op, init.manager and
init.phase-op are untouched and still consumed. The $PLAN_STRATEGY bash
resolver is deliberately retained — ungated local-planning bullets still
read it, so the init-side fact supplements it rather than replacing it.

converge-fail-fast required splitting one bash fence so the always-run
CONVERGENCE_ARGS construction stays outside the marker. All three
flag-absent fallbacks were left outside their markers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize review and discuss-phase-assumptions

Admit state:reviewer-instances-configured (two peripheral notes share it;
the core reviewer-lane dispatch stays unmarked — it is the workflow's
primary always-evaluated logic, not an optional branch) and
state:auto-advance-active, which folds --auto OR two config keys into one
boolean so the grammar stays operator-free.

discuss-phase-assumptions was the highest-risk edit in this PR. Its
auto_advance step is a full if/elif/else; gating it whole would have
deleted the flag-absent fallback needed exactly when --auto is off. Split
verified exact: resolvers 636-651 and the 'End here' fallback 668-669 both
stay outside the marker; only 653-667 is gated.

Adds emitted-drift acks for the two files that grew — review.md (+55 B)
and autonomous.md (+737 B from 80799211c, which had none and would have
red-gated the push.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): fragmentize docs-update, update, transition and new-milestone Part A

Completes the 13-workflow rollout. Three of these had no init call at all
and gained a dedicated entry point plus their first gsd_run query line.

Admits state:is-monorepo and adds state:next-channel, state:workstream-active
and state:flat-mode. Vocabulary 26 -> 30 atoms.

Part A of new-milestone applies when NO workstream is active — the negation
of state:workstream-active. Rather than teach the grammar negation, which is
the Greenspun drift the frozen list exists to prevent, it gets a separate
positively-phrased atom whose fact is the inverse. Part B, which always runs,
stays outside the marker.

flag:--verify-only is deliberately NOT admitted: docs-update has no
contiguous purely-additive region for it, and an atom without a consuming
section is dead vocabulary. Evidence recorded in the slice report.

update.md reuses its existing resolved $GSD_TOOLS rather than prepending the
canonical preamble, which would have clobbered it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): stop automated-ui-verification re-resolving its own gate, retire dead vocabulary

Two defects the new tests caught.

The automated-ui-verification step re-ran gsd_run loop render-hooks and
recomputed UI_PHASE_ACTIVE inside a body that is only read when that fact
is already true — the circular self-disabling pattern this design forbids,
introduced by 3c654b168. cmdInitVerifyWork now exposes ui_phase_active and
the step consumes it. Its launcher preamble goes too: no gsd_run remains.
The Playwright-MCP check stays as prose — that is live session state.

Dead vocabulary predating this PR: flag:--full and state:needs-codebase-map
were admitted with a gate-1 claim that never materialized. flag:--full is
removed, redundant once quick folds it into discuss/research/validate.
state:needs-codebase-map gets the real consumer it always lacked, gating
new-project's codebase-map offer. Vocabulary 30 -> 29, and no atom is now
without a consuming section.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#2994): add the atom-admission, inversion and resolver-hoist gates

The two existing parity guards prove vocabulary/predicate symmetry but
never that a fact is computed — an atom no cmdInit* assembles evaluates
false forever. These close that hole:

- per-atom satisfiability for all 29 atoms, plus an anti-vacuity assertion
  so the loop cannot silently cover zero atoms
- dead-vocabulary check against the shipped manifest
- inversion guard: the flag-absent fallbacks in discuss-phase-assumptions
  and verify-work must stay outside their markers
- data-driven resolver-hoist guard over the shipped manifest, so a future
  extraction cannot reintroduce the circular class
- compound-fold coverage (--full, --cross-ai, --rc, config-only --auto)
- null-vs-[] degraded/computed distinction, and flag value shapes

Also repairs the frozen-vocabulary lock, which was stale and red for the
seven atoms earlier commits on this branch shipped.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#2994): add changeset for the fragment-model rollout

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#2994): cite the issue on the two new allow-test-rule exemptions

ADR-456 requires an issue ref on the same line as the annotation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#2994): correct the atom-count claims after retiring flag:--full

The vocabulary doc comments still said 30 entries; it is 29 since
flag:--full was removed as dead vocabulary.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): dedupe the phase-fallback block and harden --ws parsing

Review findings.

MAJOR: the three new init entry points each pasted a verbatim copy of the
guardedFindPhase/guardedGetRoadmapPhase fallback, taking the repo from four
copies to seven — DEFECT.GENERATIVE-FIX. Extracted applyRoadmapFallback and
folded six of the seven; each call site keeps its own field-set via a
closure. Duplication removed rather than papered over with a parity test.
cmdInitPhaseOp stays out: its fallback omits has_reviews, so it is not a
byte-identical copy, and it is CRITICAL-radius.

LOW, pre-existing: GSD_WS captured [^[:space:]]+ and expands unquoted, so a
workstream name holding glob metacharacters would expand against the
filesystem. Narrowed to [A-Za-z0-9._-]+. The unquoted expansion is kept —
it must word-split into two args and vanish when empty.

Also restores the vocabulary ordering convention, and fixes a masked test
bug the mandated run surfaced: the flag-forwarding guard checked only the
first init line per workflow, but new-milestone has two, so a real failure
was reporting exit 0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): drop the stale new-milestone emitted-drift ack

new-milestone.md was acked for a +406 B growth measured against an
intermediate commit. Net against origin/next it SHRANK by 8 bytes, so
nothing needed the ack and it explained nothing — which the differential
attribution check reports as a stale acknowledgment, not a pass.

update.md's entry stays: it genuinely grew +703 B.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): resolve the 15 failures from the full matrix run

All 15 were real and identical on both lanes.

REAL REGRESSION: autonomous.md hit 41479 chars against the #2196 guard's
40960 cap — a CHARS cap distinct from the LARGE tier byte cap, which the
five section stubs pushed it over. Extracted the 3a.5 UI Design Contract
body to references/; now 39968 chars, and the file nets -795 B vs base, so
its growth ack is deleted rather than left stale.

REAL DEFECT: docs referenced /gsd-transition, which is not a live
registered command. Reworded.

STALE FIXTURE: the emission byte-identity test hardcoded two marked
workflows; this branch legitimately marks fifteen. Fixture corrected — the
source was right.

The rest were drift guards over the eight workflows the earlier sweep did
not cover, retargeted at where the content now lives with non-vacuity
proven by blanking each step file and confirming failure. The GSD_WS
forwarding guard was checked as a possible real break and is not one: the
charclass narrowing is intact and forwarding works end to end.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): drop the ack for a newly-added reference file

A new file's emitted ripple is attributable to the diff that adds it, so
the acknowledgment explained nothing and the differential check reports it
as stale. Removing the last entry removes the fragment — an empty one
signals nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2994): retarget the UI-contract guards and clear two transitive advisories

The §3a.5 extraction that brought autonomous.md under the #2196 char cap
moved its body to references/autonomous-ui-design-contract.md, so ten
guards in autonomous-ui-steps and check-ui-safety-gate were asserting it
against the host. Retargeted via a combined read, each proven non-vacuous
by blanking the reference file and confirming failure.

This class had already bitten twice on this branch because each sweep was
scoped to the workflows touched at that moment, so this one was
exhaustive: ~70 test files across all 13 workflows, zero further broken or
vacuous assertions found.

Also clears two high transitive advisories the matrix flagged on one lane
— fast-uri GHSA-7p8r-x3mc-p8w7 and three ip-address SSRF/trust-boundary
issues. Both pre-date this branch: package-lock.json was untouched until
now, so the production tree was byte-identical to the base. Lockfile-only,
package.json unchanged, verified against a real npm ci install.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2994): backfill changeset pr number to 3030

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 19:59:58 -04:00

25 KiB

Check project progress, summarize recent work and what's ahead, then intelligently route to the next action — either executing an existing plan or creating the next one. Provides situational awareness before continuing work.

<required_reading> Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting. </required_reading>

**Load progress context (paths only):**
_GSD_SHIM_NAME="gsd-tools.cjs"; _GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT="${RUNTIME_DIR:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)}"; GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; if [ -f "$GSD_TOOLS" ]; then gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.codex/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.codex/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif command -v gsd-tools >/dev/null 2>&1; then GSD_TOOLS="$(command -v gsd-tools)"; gsd_run() { "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${HERMES_HOME:-$HOME/.hermes}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${HERMES_HOME:-$HOME/.hermes}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CURSOR_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cursor}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CURSOR_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cursor}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${GEMINI_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${GEMINI_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${COPILOT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.copilot}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${COPILOT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.copilot}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${WINDSURF_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codeium/windsurf}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${WINDSURF_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codeium/windsurf}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${AUGMENT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.augment}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${AUGMENT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.augment}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${TRAE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.trae}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${TRAE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.trae}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${QWEN_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.qwen}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${QWEN_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.qwen}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CODEBUDDY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codebuddy}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CODEBUDDY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codebuddy}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CLINE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cline}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CLINE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cline}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${GROK_AGENTS_HOME:-$HOME/.agents}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${GROK_AGENTS_HOME:-$HOME/.agents}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${ANTIGRAVITY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini/antigravity}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${ANTIGRAVITY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini/antigravity}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/opencode}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/opencode}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${KILO_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/kilo}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${KILO_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/kilo}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; else echo "ERROR: gsd-tools.cjs not found at $GSD_TOOLS and gsd-tools is not on PATH. Run: npx -y @opengsd/gsd-core@latest --claude --local" >&2; exit 1; fi; if [ -n "${CLAUDE_ENV_FILE:-}" ] && [ -n "${GSD_TOOLS:-}" ]; then printf "export PATH='%s':\"\$PATH\"\n" "${GSD_TOOLS%/*}" >> "$CLAUDE_ENV_FILE" 2>/dev/null || true; fi
FORENSIC_PARAM=""; if [[ "$ARGUMENTS" =~ (^|[[:space:]])--forensic([[:space:]]|$) ]]; then FORENSIC_PARAM="--forensic"; fi
INIT=$(gsd_run query init.progress $FORENSIC_PARAM)
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi

Extract from init JSON: project_exists, roadmap_exists, state_exists, phases, current_phase, next_phase, milestone_version, completed_count, phase_count, paused_at, state_path, roadmap_path, project_path, config_path, phase_mvp_mode.

DISCUSS_MODE=$(gsd_run query config-get workflow.discuss_mode 2>/dev/null || echo "discuss")

If project_exists is false (no .planning/ directory):

No planning structure found.

Run /gsd:new-project to start a new project.

Exit.

If missing STATE.md: suggest /gsd:new-project.

If ROADMAP.md missing but PROJECT.md exists:

This means a milestone was completed and archived. Go to Route F (between milestones).

If missing both ROADMAP.md and PROJECT.md: suggest /gsd:new-project.

**Use structured extraction from `gsd-tools.cjs query` (or legacy gsd-tools.cjs):**

Instead of reading full files, use targeted tools to get only the data needed for the report:

  • ROADMAP=$(gsd-tools.cjs query roadmap.analyze)
  • STATE=$(gsd-tools.cjs query state-snapshot)

This minimizes orchestrator context usage.

**Get comprehensive roadmap analysis (replaces manual parsing):**
ROADMAP=$(gsd_run query roadmap.analyze)

This returns structured JSON with:

  • All phases with disk status (complete/partial/planned/empty/no_directory)
  • Goal and dependencies per phase
  • Plan and summary counts per phase
  • Aggregated stats: total plans, summaries, progress percent
  • Current and next phase identification

Use this instead of manually reading/parsing ROADMAP.md.

**Gather recent work context:**
  • Find the 2-3 most recent SUMMARY.md files
  • Use summary-extract for efficient parsing:
    gsd_run query summary-extract <path> --fields one_liner
    
  • This shows "what we've been working on"
**Parse current position from init context and roadmap analysis:**
  • Use current_phase and next_phase from $ROADMAP
  • Note paused_at if work was paused (from $STATE)
  • Count pending todos: use init todos or list-todos
  • Check for active debug sessions: (ls .planning/debug/*.md 2>/dev/null || true) | grep -v resolved | wc -l
> ⚠️ Context authority: PROJECT.md, STATE.md, and ROADMAP.md are the authoritative sources > for project name, milestone, current phase, and next-step routing. CLAUDE.md ## Project > blocks are a secondary config aid that may be significantly stale — do NOT use the > CLAUDE.md project description as a source for any progress report field.

Generate progress bar from gsd-tools.cjs query progress / progress.json, then present rich status report:

# Get formatted progress bar
PROGRESS_BAR=$(gsd_run query progress.bar --raw)

Present:

# [Project Name]

**Progress:** {PROGRESS_BAR}
**Profile:** [quality/balanced/budget/inherit]
**Discuss mode:** {DISCUSS_MODE}

## Recent Work
- [Phase X, Plan Y]: [what was accomplished - 1 line from summary-extract]
- [Phase X, Plan Z]: [what was accomplished - 1 line from summary-extract]

## Current Position
Phase [N] of [total]: [phase-name]
Plan [M] of [phase-total]: [status]
CONTEXT: [✓ if has_context | - if not]

## Key Decisions Made
- [extract from $STATE.decisions[]]
- [e.g. jq -r '.decisions[].decision' from state-snapshot]

## Blockers/Concerns
- [extract from $STATE.blockers[]]
- [e.g. jq -r '.blockers[].text' from state-snapshot]

## Pending Todos
- [count] pending — /gsd:capture --list to review

## Open Windows
- [count] open in `.planning/WINDOWS.md` — /gsd:ship blocks while any remain
(Only show this section if count > 0; suppressed when ledger is empty or absent)

```bash
WINDOWS_STATUS=$(gsd_run windows status --raw 2>/dev/null || echo '')
WINDOWS_OPEN=$(printf '%s' "$WINDOWS_STATUS" | jq -r '.ledger.open_count // 0' 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
WINDOWS_WAIVED=$(printf '%s' "$WINDOWS_STATUS" | jq -r '.ledger.waived_count // 0' 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
```

Render `Open Windows` only when `$WINDOWS_OPEN` is greater than `0` (or `$WINDOWS_WAIVED` is greater than `0`, so an auditable deferral history remains visible). Phrase: `{WINDOWS_OPEN} open, {WINDOWS_WAIVED} waived — resolves with /gsd:ship gate; inspect via gsd_run windows status`. The ledger is cross-phase; the count is the project total, not the current phase's.


## Active Debug Sessions
- [count] active — /gsd:debug to continue
(Only show this section if count > 0)

## What's Next
[Next phase/plan objective from roadmap analyze]

If section_manifest is null or "mvp-display" is in its included list: read and execute gsd-core/workflows/progress/steps/mvp-display.md. Otherwise skip — do not read the file.

**Determine next action based on verified counts.**

Step 0: Resume-incomplete-phase invariant (Route 0)

Before any current-phase-scoped counting, scan ALL phases for incomplete execution. This catches the case where STATE.md's current_phase was advanced past the phase that actually has unfinished work (common after a mid-execution session death from hang, token exhaustion, or API disruption). Without this guard, the current-phase-scoped count in Step 1 would inspect the wrong phase and the routing would skip the unfinished work.

Skip if --no-resume or --force is present in $ARGUMENTS.

Scan all phases via the $ROADMAP JSON already loaded in analyze_roadmap. For each phase entry, compare plans length to summaries length using the same plans-without-summaries predicate as determine_next_action Route 4 (plans.length > summaries.length). Stop at the first (lowest-numbered) phase where the predicate is true. Record its phase number as INCOMPLETE_PHASE.

If $ROADMAP is empty or the query failed, surface a warning rather than silently proceeding:

INCOMPLETE_PHASE=""
if [ -z "$ROADMAP" ]; then
  echo "⚠ WARNING: resume-incomplete-phase scan could not run (\$ROADMAP is empty)." >&2
  echo "  The incomplete-phase invariant (#160) could not be verified." >&2
  echo "  Review project state carefully before continuing." >&2
else
  for PHASE_NUM in $(echo "$ROADMAP" | jq -r '.phases[] | (.number // .phase_number)'); do
    PHASE_DATA=$(echo "$ROADMAP" | jq --arg n "$PHASE_NUM" '.phases[] | select((.number // .phase_number) == ($n | tonumber))')
    PLAN_COUNT=$(echo "$PHASE_DATA" | jq '(.plans // []) | length')
    SUMMARY_COUNT=$(echo "$PHASE_DATA" | jq '(.summaries // []) | length')
    if [ "${PLAN_COUNT:-0}" -gt "${SUMMARY_COUNT:-0}" ]; then
      INCOMPLETE_PHASE="$PHASE_NUM"
      break
    fi
  done
fi

If INCOMPLETE_PHASE is non-empty: emit a one-line resume notice in the routing output and route to /gsd:execute-phase ${INCOMPLETE_PHASE} instead of running Step 1's current-phase routing. The progress report (already displayed by the report step above) gives the user full project status before this routing decision is shown.

---

## ▶ Next Up — Resuming incomplete Phase ${INCOMPLETE_PHASE}

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:execute-phase ${INCOMPLETE_PHASE} ${GSD_WS}`

(plans without summaries detected; use --no-resume to skip this check and route by current_phase instead; --force to skip all gates)

---

Then exit the route step. Do NOT run Steps 1 through Routes A-F.

If INCOMPLETE_PHASE is empty: continue to Step 1.

Step 1: Count plans, summaries, and issues in current phase

List files in the current phase directory:

(ls -1 .planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]/*-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null || true) | wc -l
(ls -1 .planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]/*-SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null || true) | wc -l
(ls -1 .planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]/*-UAT.md 2>/dev/null || true) | wc -l

State: "This phase has {X} plans, {Y} summaries."

Step 1.5: Check for unaddressed UAT gaps

Check for UAT.md files with status "diagnosed" (has gaps needing fixes).

# Check for diagnosed UAT with gaps or partial (incomplete) testing
grep -l "status: diagnosed\|status: partial" .planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]/*-UAT.md 2>/dev/null || true

Track:

  • uat_with_gaps: UAT.md files with status "diagnosed" (gaps need fixing)
  • uat_partial: UAT.md files with status "partial" (incomplete testing)

Step 1.6: Cross-phase health check

Scan ALL phases in the current milestone for outstanding verification debt using the CLI (which respects milestone boundaries via getMilestonePhaseFilter):

DEBT=$(gsd_run query audit-uat --raw 2>/dev/null)

Parse JSON for summary.total_items and summary.total_files.

Track: outstanding_debt — summary.total_items from the audit.

If outstanding_debt > 0: Add a warning section to the progress report output (in the report step), placed between "## What's Next" and the route suggestion:

## Verification Debt ({N} files across prior phases)

| Phase | File | Issue |
|-------|------|-------|
| {phase} | {filename} | {pending_count} pending, {skipped_count} skipped, {blocked_count} blocked |
| {phase} | {filename} | human_needed — {count} items |
| {phase} | {filename} | {unresolved_count} deferred items |

Review: `/gsd:audit-uat ${GSD_WS}` — full cross-phase audit
Resume testing: `/gsd:verify-work {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — retest specific phase

This is a WARNING, not a blocker — routing proceeds normally. The debt is visible so the user can make an informed choice.

Step 1.7: Check verification status for the current phase

A phase whose verification is missing, unknown, gaps_found, or human_needed is NOT complete, even when every PLAN.md has a matching SUMMARY.md. The count-based status (roadmap.analyze) only sees plans/summaries, so without this check such a phase is reported complete and routing skips straight to the next phase. When the phase appears count-complete (summaries = plans AND plans > 0), consult the verification report (the same verification.status gate ship and execute-phase use, from #651):

PHASE_DIR=".planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]"
VERIFICATION=$(gsd_run query verification.status "${PHASE_DIR}" 2>/dev/null)
VERIFICATION_STATUS=$(printf '%s' "$VERIFICATION" | jq -r '.status' 2>/dev/null || echo "")
VERIFICATION_NEXT_ACTION=$(printf '%s' "$VERIFICATION" | jq -r '.next_action' 2>/dev/null || echo "")

Track: verification_status — the .status field (passed | stale | gaps_found | human_needed | missing | unknown). The query/projection handles a missing VERIFICATION.md (missing), unexpected values, and stale verification (stale, when summaries are newer than verification). Only passed routes as phase complete (Step 3); every other status routes back to close verification debt (Step 2).

Step 2: Route based on counts

Condition Meaning Action
uat_partial > 0 UAT testing incomplete Go to Route E.2
uat_with_gaps > 0 UAT gaps need fix plans Go to Route E
summaries < plans Unexecuted plans exist Go to Route A
summaries = plans AND plans > 0 AND verification_status = missing Phase executed; verification report missing Go to Route V.missing
summaries = plans AND plans > 0 AND verification_status = unknown Phase executed; verification status unknown Go to Route V.unknown
summaries = plans AND plans > 0 AND verification_status = stale Phase executed; verification is stale Go to Route V.stale
summaries = plans AND plans > 0 AND verification_status = gaps_found Phase executed; verification found gaps Go to Route V.gaps
summaries = plans AND plans > 0 AND verification_status = human_needed Phase executed; awaiting human verification Go to Route V.human
summaries = plans AND plans > 0 AND verification_status = passed Phase complete (verification passed) Go to Step 3
plans = 0 Phase not yet planned Go to Route B

Rows are evaluated top to bottom; the first matching row wins. The verification_status rows must precede the passed row so non-passed verification is not reported as complete.


Route A: Unexecuted plan exists

Find the first PLAN.md without matching SUMMARY.md. Read its <objective> section.

---

## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}

**{phase}-{plan}: [Plan Name]** — [objective summary from PLAN.md]

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:execute-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}`

---

Route B: Phase needs planning

Check if {phase_num}-CONTEXT.md exists in phase directory.

Check if current phase has UI indicators:

PHASE_SECTION=$(gsd_run query roadmap.get-phase "${CURRENT_PHASE}" 2>/dev/null)
PHASE_HAS_UI=$(echo "$PHASE_SECTION" | grep -qi "UI hint.*yes" && echo "true" || echo "false")

If CONTEXT.md exists:

---

## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}

**Phase {N}: {Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}
<sub>✓ Context gathered, ready to plan</sub>

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:plan-phase {phase-number} ${GSD_WS}`

---

If CONTEXT.md does NOT exist AND phase has UI (PHASE_HAS_UI is true):

---

## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}

**Phase {N}: {Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:discuss-phase {phase}` — gather context and clarify approach

---

**Also available:**
- `/gsd:ui-phase {phase}` — generate UI design contract (recommended for frontend phases)
- `/gsd:plan-phase {phase}` — skip discussion, plan directly
- `/gsd:discuss-phase {phase}` — include assumptions check before planning

---

If CONTEXT.md does NOT exist AND phase has no UI:

---

## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}

**Phase {N}: {Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:discuss-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — gather context and clarify approach

---

**Also available:**
- `/gsd:plan-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — skip discussion, plan directly
- `/gsd:discuss-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — include assumptions check before planning

---

Route E: UAT gaps need fix plans

UAT.md exists with gaps (diagnosed issues). User needs to plan fixes.

---

## ⚠ UAT Gaps Found

**{phase_num}-UAT.md** has {N} gaps requiring fixes.

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:plan-phase {phase} --gaps ${GSD_WS}`

---

**Also available:**
- `/gsd:execute-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — execute phase plans
- `/gsd:verify-work {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — run more UAT testing

---

Route E.2: UAT testing incomplete (partial)

UAT.md exists with status: partial — testing session ended before all items resolved.

---

## Incomplete UAT Testing

**{phase_num}-UAT.md** has {N} unresolved tests (pending, blocked, or skipped).

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:verify-work {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — resume testing from where you left off

---

**Also available:**
- `/gsd:audit-uat ${GSD_WS}` — full cross-phase UAT audit
- `/gsd:execute-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — execute phase plans

---

Route V.missing: verification report missing

All plans have summaries, but canonical verification has not passed. The phase is implementation-complete, not phase-complete.

`/gsd:execute-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — re-run execution verification

Route V.unknown: verification status unknown

VERIFICATION.md has an unexpected status. The phase is implementation-complete, not phase-complete.

`/gsd:execute-phase {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — regenerate verification

Route V.stale: verification is stale

VERIFICATION.md has status: passed, but one or more SUMMARY.md files are newer than the verification report. The phase is implementation-complete, not phase-complete.

`/gsd:verify-work {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — re-run verification against the latest summaries

Route V.gaps: verification found gaps (gaps_found)

VERIFICATION.md exists with status: gaps_found — verification identified gaps that need fix plans. The phase is NOT complete.

---

## ⚠ Verification Gaps Found

**{phase_num}-VERIFICATION.md** reports `gaps_found`. ${VERIFICATION_NEXT_ACTION}

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:plan-phase {phase} --gaps ${GSD_WS}`

---

Route V.human: human verification required (human_needed)

VERIFICATION.md exists with status: human_needed — automated checks passed but manual verification items remain. The phase is NOT complete until they are resolved.

---

## Human Verification Required

**{phase_num}-VERIFICATION.md** reports `human_needed`. ${VERIFICATION_NEXT_ACTION}

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:verify-work {phase} ${GSD_WS}` — resume human verification

---

Step 3: Check milestone status (only when phase complete)

Read ROADMAP.md and identify:

  1. Current phase number
  2. All phase numbers in the current milestone section

Count total phases and identify the highest phase number.

State: "Current phase is {X}. Milestone has {N} phases (highest: {Y})."

Route based on milestone status:

Condition Meaning Action
current phase < highest phase More phases remain Go to Route C
current phase = highest phase All phases complete Go to Route D

Route C: Phase complete, more phases remain

Read ROADMAP.md to get the next phase's name and goal.

Check if next phase has UI indicators:

NEXT_PHASE_SECTION=$(gsd_run query roadmap.get-phase "$((Z+1))" 2>/dev/null)
NEXT_HAS_UI=$(echo "$NEXT_PHASE_SECTION" | grep -qi "UI hint.*yes" && echo "true" || echo "false")

If next phase has UI (NEXT_HAS_UI is true):

---

## ✓ Phase {Z} Complete

## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}

**Phase {Z+1}: {Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:discuss-phase {Z+1}` — gather context and clarify approach

---

**Also available:**
- `/gsd:ui-phase {Z+1}` — generate UI design contract (recommended for frontend phases)
- `/gsd:plan-phase {Z+1}` — skip discussion, plan directly
- `/gsd:verify-work {Z}` — user acceptance test before continuing

---

If next phase has no UI:

---

## ✓ Phase {Z} Complete

## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}

**Phase {Z+1}: {Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:discuss-phase {Z+1} ${GSD_WS}` — gather context and clarify approach

---

**Also available:**
- `/gsd:plan-phase {Z+1} ${GSD_WS}` — skip discussion, plan directly
- `/gsd:verify-work {Z} ${GSD_WS}` — user acceptance test before continuing

---

Route D: All phases complete (milestone ready to close)

---

## 🎉 Milestone Complete

All {N} phases finished!

## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}

**Complete Milestone** — archive and prepare for next

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:complete-milestone ${GSD_WS}`

---

**Also available:**
- `/gsd:verify-work ${GSD_WS}` — user acceptance test before completing milestone

---

Route F: Between milestones (ROADMAP.md missing, PROJECT.md exists)

A milestone was completed and archived. Ready to start the next milestone cycle.

Read MILESTONES.md to find the last completed milestone version.

---

## ✓ Milestone v{X.Y} Complete

Ready to plan the next milestone.

## ▶ Next Up — [${PROJECT_CODE}] ${PROJECT_TITLE}

**Start Next Milestone** — questioning → research → requirements → roadmap

`/clear` then:

`/gsd:new-milestone ${GSD_WS}`

---
**Handle edge cases:**
  • Phase complete but next phase not planned → offer /gsd:plan-phase [next] ${GSD_WS}
  • All work complete → offer milestone completion
  • Blockers present → highlight before offering to continue
  • Handoff file exists → mention it, offer /gsd:resume-work ${GSD_WS}

If section_manifest is null or "forensic-audit" is in its included list: read and execute gsd-core/workflows/progress/steps/forensic-audit.md. Otherwise skip — do not read the file.

<success_criteria>

  • Rich context provided (recent work, decisions, issues)
  • Current position clear with visual progress
  • What's next clearly explained
  • Smart routing: /gsd:execute-phase if plans exist, /gsd:plan-phase if not
  • User confirms before any action
  • Seamless handoff to appropriate gsd command </success_criteria>