Files
msd-core/commands/gsd/discuss-phase.md
Tom Boucher 1452b1275b fix(dispatcher): rename Task→Agent in allowed-tools, workflow prose, and agent tools frontmatter
Fixes #3168

The Claude Code subagent dispatcher tool is named `Agent` (with `subagent_type`
parameter). The `Task*` namespace (TaskCreate, TaskList, TaskGet, TaskUpdate,
TaskOutput, TaskStop) is the separate task-tracker. GSD's commands, workflows,
and agents were partially migrated and still referenced `- Task` / `Task(` in
55 files, causing orchestrators to silently fall back to inline execution when
no `Task` tool appeared on their tool surface.

Changes:
- `commands/gsd/*.md` allowed-tools: replaced `- Task` with `- Agent` in 24
  files; removed duplicate `- Task` from autonomous.md (already had `- Agent`)
- `get-shit-done/workflows/*.md`: replaced dispatcher `Task(` → `Agent(` in
  29 workflow files (~133 call sites); TaskCreate/List/Get/Update/Output/Stop
  left untouched
- `agents/gsd-debug-session-manager.md`: replaced `Task` → `Agent` in tools
  frontmatter (the only remaining agent with the wrong name)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-06 15:00:08 -04:00

76 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

---
name: gsd:discuss-phase
description: Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning.
argument-hint: "<phase> [--all] [--auto] [--chain] [--batch] [--analyze] [--text] [--power] [--assumptions]"
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Bash
- Glob
- Grep
- AskUserQuestion
- Agent
- mcp__context7__resolve-library-id
- mcp__context7__query-docs
---
<objective>
Extract implementation decisions that downstream agents need — researcher and planner will use CONTEXT.md to know what to investigate and what choices are locked.
**How it works:**
1. Load prior context (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, STATE.md, prior CONTEXT.md files)
2. Scout codebase for reusable assets and patterns
3. Analyze phase — skip gray areas already decided in prior phases
4. Present remaining gray areas — user selects which to discuss
5. Deep-dive each selected area until satisfied
6. Create CONTEXT.md with decisions that guide research and planning
**Output:** `{phase_num}-CONTEXT.md` — decisions clear enough that downstream agents can act without asking the user again
</objective>
<execution_context>
Workflow files are loaded on-demand in the <process> section below — not upfront.
Do not pre-load any workflow files before reading the mode routing instructions.
</execution_context>
<runtime_note>
**Copilot (VS Code):** Use `vscode_askquestions` wherever this workflow calls `AskUserQuestion`. They are equivalent — `vscode_askquestions` is the VS Code Copilot implementation of the same interactive question API.
</runtime_note>
<context>
Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
Context files are resolved in-workflow using `init phase-op` and roadmap/state tool calls.
</context>
<process>
**Mode routing:**
```bash
DISCUSS_MODE=$(gsd-sdk query config-get workflow.discuss_mode 2>/dev/null || echo "discuss")
```
If `--assumptions` is in $ARGUMENTS:
Read and execute `~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/list-phase-assumptions.md` end-to-end.
Stop here.
Otherwise, if `DISCUSS_MODE` is `"assumptions"`:
Read and execute `~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase-assumptions.md` end-to-end.
Otherwise (`"discuss"` / unset / any other value):
Read and execute `~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase.md` end-to-end.
**MANDATORY:** Read the appropriate workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The objective and success_criteria sections in this command file are summaries — the workflow file contains the complete step-by-step process with all required behaviors, config checks, and interaction patterns. Do not improvise from the summary.
**Lazy loading:** `templates/context.md` is loaded inside the `write_context` step of the active workflow. `discuss-phase-power.md` is loaded inside `discuss-phase.md` when `--power` is detected. Do not load either here.
</process>
<success_criteria>
- Prior context loaded and applied (no re-asking decided questions)
- Gray areas identified through intelligent analysis
- User chose which areas to discuss
- Each selected area explored until satisfied
- Scope creep redirected to deferred ideas
- CONTEXT.md captures decisions, not vague vision
- User knows next steps
</success_criteria>