Files
msd-core/get-shit-done/workflows/mvp-phase.md
Tom Boucher 2d32ad82be fix(plan-phase): remove agent: directive that caused OpenCode subagent dispatch (#3156) (#3206)
* feat(roadmap): parse **Mode:** field on phase sections

Adds a 'mode' field to roadmap.get-phase and roadmap.analyze outputs.
Recognizes '**Mode:** mvp' lines in phase sections; lowercased + trimmed.
Forward-compat: unrecognized values preserved verbatim, no enum check.

Foundation for --mvp flag in plan-phase (PRD: vertical-mvp-slice).

* feat(plan-phase): parse --mvp flag and resolve MVP_MODE

Resolution order: CLI flag → ROADMAP **Mode:** field → workflow.mvp_mode
config → false. Walking Skeleton gate fires for new-project Phase 1.
Wires MVP_MODE + WALKING_SKELETON into gsd-planner subagent prompt.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 1 (Q1, Q2, Q4).

* docs(planner): add vertical-slice planning reference

New reference loaded by gsd-planner when MVP_MODE=true. Defines slice
ordering, Walking Skeleton rules, and anti-patterns. Referenced from
plan-phase workflow MVP_MODE wiring.

* docs(planner): add SKELETON.md template

Template emitted by gsd-planner under WALKING_SKELETON=true. Captures
architectural decisions and out-of-scope list for new-project Phase 1.

* chore(inventory): register new planner references

Added planner-mvp-mode.md and skeleton-template.md to INVENTORY.md and
INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json. References now: 53.

* feat(gsd-planner): add MVP Mode Detection section

Mode-switched branch in the existing planner agent (per Q4: single agent).
Vertical-slice decomposition rules, Walking Skeleton handling, and
TDD-mode compatibility. Heavy guidance lives in references/planner-mvp-mode.md.

* test(plan-phase): add --mvp resolution-chain integration cases

Validates roadmap.get-phase --pick mode and confirms workflow.mvp_mode
default is unset in fresh projects.

* docs(changelog): announce --mvp vertical-slice planning (#2826)

* feat(mvp-phase): add /gsd mvp-phase slash command

Standalone command for vertical MVP planning. Frontmatter only;
heavyweight workflow at get-shit-done/workflows/mvp-phase.md follows
in next commit. Mirrors discuss-phase/edit-phase command shape.

* docs(planner): add user-story-template reference

Defines the canonical 'As a / I want to / So that' format and the
ROADMAP.md / PLAN.md emit rules. Used by mvp-phase workflow and
gsd-planner agent under MVP_MODE.

* docs(planner): add SPIDR splitting reference

Defines size signals, the five SPIDR axes (Spike/Paths/Interfaces/Data/Rules),
the interactive workflow, and anti-patterns. Per PRD Q3 decision: full
interactive flow, not lightweight check. Used by mvp-phase workflow.

* fix(mvp-phase): trim description to fit 100-char budget

* feat(mvp-phase): add mvp-phase workflow

Standalone workflow: phase validation -> user story prompts (As a / I want to /
So that) -> SPIDR splitting check -> ROADMAP write (Mode + Goal) -> delegation
to plan-phase. Per PRD Phase 2 (Q3 full SPIDR; Phase-2-A/B/C/D decisions).

Plan-phase auto-detects MVP via Phase 1's resolution chain, so no flags
are needed when delegating.

* feat(gsd-planner): emit user-story header in PLAN.md under MVP mode

Extends the MVP Mode Detection section (added in Phase 1) so the planner
sources the user story from ROADMAP **Goal:** and emits the bolded
**As a** / **I want to** / **so that** form as the first content under
the phase header in PLAN.md. References user-story-template.md.

* test(mvp-phase): integration smoke test for ROADMAP mutation

Validates roadmap.get-phase output after a workflow-spec'd ROADMAP write:
mode=mvp and goal=full user story. Catches schema drift between workflow
emit and parser expectation. Includes a long-story case (>120 chars) to
confirm SPIDR-rejected stories still parse correctly.

* chore(inventory): register mvp-phase command + 2 new references

Adds /gsd mvp-phase to commands list, mvp-phase workflow to workflows list,
and user-story-template.md + spidr-splitting.md to references. References
count: 53 -> 55.

* docs(changelog): announce /gsd mvp-phase command (#2826)

* fix(mvp-phase): add TEXT_MODE plain-text fallback for non-Claude runtimes (#2012)

* docs(executor): add MVP+TDD gate reference

Defines the runtime gate semantics for execute-phase when both
MVP_MODE and TDD_MODE are true: pre-task verification of failing-test
commit, end-of-phase review escalation from advisory to blocking,
behavior-adding task definition. Loaded conditionally by
execute-phase workflow and gsd-executor agent.

* feat(execute-phase): MVP+TDD runtime gate + blocking review

Resolves MVP_MODE in Step 1 (CLI flag -> roadmap mode -> config -> false).
Adds per-task gate that halts before behavior-adding tasks run if no
failing-test commit exists for the plan. Escalates end-of-phase TDD
review from advisory to blocking when both MVP_MODE and TDD_MODE active.

Also updates INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json to register execute-mvp-tdd.md
(added by Task 1) so manifest-sync tests pass.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 3a (decisions Phase-3-A, Phase-3-Split).

* feat(gsd-executor): add MVP+TDD Gate section

Mirrors the planner's MVP Mode Detection pattern from Phase 1.
Instructs halt-and-report when the runtime gate trips, references
execute-mvp-tdd.md for full semantics. No agent changes outside the
new section.

* test(execute-phase): add MVP+TDD resolution-chain integration cases

Validates roadmap.get-phase --pick mode and confirms workflow.mvp_mode
default is unset in fresh projects. Mirrors the Phase 1 plan-phase
resolution-chain integration test.

* chore(inventory): register execute-mvp-tdd reference

Bumps References count 55 -> 56. Registers execute-mvp-tdd.md.
Adds "init" to PROSE_ALLOWLIST in registry integration test so
bare `gsd-sdk query init` prose examples in plan docs don't
trigger the unregistered-handler guard (real commands are all
init.<subcommand>).

* docs(changelog): announce MVP+TDD runtime gate in execute-phase (#2826)

* docs(verifier): add verify-mvp-mode reference

Defines UAT framing under MVP mode: user-flow walk-through first,
technical checks deferred, coverage check as goal-backward narrowing
to the user story's outcome clause. Loaded conditionally by
verify-work workflow and gsd-verifier agent.

* feat(verify-work): MVP-mode UAT framing — user flow first

Resolves MVP_MODE from phase mode field. Under MVP mode, generates UAT
in three ordered sections: user-flow walk-through (derived from user
story), technical checks (deferred), coverage check (goal-backward).
Falls back to standard UAT generation when mode is null/absent.
User-story-format guard refuses to verify a mode:mvp phase with a
non-user-story goal.

Also updates docs/INVENTORY.md (56 references) and
docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json to register verify-mvp-mode.md added
in Task 1.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 3b (decisions Phase-3-B,
Phase-3-Verify-Structure).

* feat(gsd-verifier): add MVP Mode Verification section

Narrows goal-backward verification to the user-story [outcome] clause
when phase mode is mvp. References verify-mvp-mode.md. Preserves
existing goal-backward methodology for non-MVP phases. User-story-format
guard refuses to verify a mode:mvp phase with a non-user-story goal.

* docs(changelog): announce MVP-mode UAT framing in verify-work (#2826)

* feat(new-project): add Vertical MVP vs Horizontal Layers mode prompt

Asks user at project init how to structure the project. Vertical MVP
emits **Mode:** mvp on every initial roadmap phase (per-phase mode
preserved per PRD Q1). Horizontal Layers falls back to standard
template — no behavioral change for existing flows.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 4 (decision Phase-4-Persistence).

* feat(progress): add MVP-mode user-flow display

When phase has **Mode:** mvp, progress renders user-flow status from
PLAN.md task names alongside standard task progress. Tasks that aren't
user-flow-shaped (technical-sounding) are filtered out of the user-flow
sub-block. Falls back to standard display when mode is null/absent.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 4 (decision Phase-4-Progress).

* feat(stats): add MVP phase count summary

Reads roadmap.analyze (which surfaces mode per phase from Phase 1) and
emits 'Phases: N total | M MVP | K standard' summary line. Suppressed
when MVP_COUNT == 0 to avoid clutter on non-MVP projects.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 4.

* feat(graphify): add MVP-mode visual differentiation

MVP-mode phases render with #22c55e fill color AND ' (MVP)' label
suffix — two-channel signaling for color-blind and grayscale renders.
Standard phases unchanged.

Per PRD vertical-mvp-slice Phase 4 (PRD Q5: distinct visual treatment).

* docs(changelog): announce Phase 4 discovery & progress (#2826)

* chore(release): bump dev to 1.50.0-canary.0 for first 1.50.0 canary

Sets the base version that .github/workflows/canary.yml derives the canary
tag from (strips suffix → base 1.50.0 → next available v1.50.0-canary.N).

This kicks off the 1.50.0 release train, opened by the MVP/TDD/UAT vertical
slice landed across PRs #2867, #2874, #2878, #2880, #2883.

* docs: add CANARY stream README + v1.50.0-canary.1 release notes

- docs/CANARY.md — explains the dev→@canary stream policy, install/rollback
  paths, and when (not) to install canary builds
- docs/RELEASE-v1.50.0-canary.1.md — release notes for the first 1.50.0
  canary cut: vertical MVP/TDD/UAT slice (#2867 + #2874 + #2878 + #2880 +
  #2883), opening the 1.50.0 train under PRD #2826
- docs/README.md — index entry + quick link for the canary stream

* fix(ci/canary): publish gate checks dev branch, not main

Four publish-step `if:` conditions in .github/workflows/canary.yml were
checking `github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'`. Those steps (Tag and push,
Publish to npm, Publish SDK to npm, Verify publish) therefore always
skipped on every workflow_dispatch invocation since canary runs from dev,
never main.

The workflow's own header comment is unambiguous: `dev → @canary`. The
gate was a copy-paste from release.yml (which correctly targets main for
the @next/@latest streams) that was never corrected for the canary stream.

This is why the 1.50.0-canary.1 publish hadn't materialized despite three
green workflow runs. With the gate corrected, the next dispatch will
actually publish.

* ci(release-sdk): make release-sdk.yml dispatchable from the dev branch

The workflow lives on main only, so the GitHub Actions "Use workflow
from" dropdown doesn't list dev — meaning dev → @dev publishes can't be
triggered from the dev branch directly. Add the file to dev so an
operator can dispatch it with branch=dev and tag=dev.

Per project release-stream policy: dev branch publishes canary (@dev).
This is the stream that needs the file most, since main never publishes
@dev itself (main does @next / @latest).

File is byte-identical to main's release-sdk.yml — straight propagation,
no behavioral change. Tracking issues #2925, #2929.

* docs(mvp): canary-prep concept cleanup — CONTEXT.md, mvp-concepts index, --prd interaction (#3176)

* chore(mvp): concept cleanup + cross-ref index for v1.50.0-canary.2 prep

- CONTEXT.md gains 7 MVP domain terms (MVP Mode, User Story, Walking
  Skeleton, Vertical Slice, Behavior-Adding Task, MVP+TDD Gate, SPIDR
  Splitting) so the project glossary matches the shipped surface.
- New get-shit-done/references/mvp-concepts.md indexes the six MVP
  reference files and concept-to-file map so agents and contributors
  can find the right canonical doc without grepping.
- plan-phase.md Walking Skeleton block now documents that --mvp and
  --prd compose orthogonally on Phase 1; no precedence needed.
- INVENTORY/INVENTORY-MANIFEST refreshed for the new reference (58 -> 59).

No behavior change. Canary-prep cleanup ahead of v1.50.0-canary.2.

Surfaced for follow-up (not in this PR):
- MVP_MODE resolution shell block duplicated across plan-phase,
  execute-phase, verify-work workflows (needs a shared workflow-include
  mechanism; structural change).
- Behavior-Adding Task predicate is prose-only; no shared utility.
- User Story regex hardcoded in verify-work; would benefit from a
  central definition consumed by the verifier and the mvp-phase command.

* chore(changeset): set PR number for mvp concept cleanup

* feat(mvp): centralize resolution surfaces + fix SDK roadmap mode parity (#3178)

Three new SDK query verbs replace the architectural duplication surfaced by
the v1.50.0-canary.2 review against dev tip 12c4e565:

  phase.mvp-mode <N> [--cli-flag]
    Single canonical precedence resolver (CLI flag -> ROADMAP **Mode:** mvp
    -> workflow.mvp_mode config -> false). Replaces 4-8 lines of bash that
    were duplicated across plan-phase.md, execute-phase.md, verify-work.md,
    and progress.md. Returns {active, source, roadmap_mode, config_mvp_mode,
    cli_flag_present}.

  task.is-behavior-adding <plan-file> | --task-content <xml>
    Behavior-Adding Task predicate (tdd="true" + <behavior> block + non-test
    source files in <files>). Replaces prose-only specification in
    references/execute-mvp-tdd.md; gsd-executor agent now invokes the verb
    instead of re-inlining the three checks. Returns {is_behavior_adding,
    checks, reason}.

  user-story.validate <text> | --story <text>
    Owns the canonical User Story regex /^As a .+, I want to .+, so that .+\.$/
    previously hardcoded in verify-work.md prose. Consumed by gsd-verifier
    (phase-goal guard) and /gsd-mvp-phase (interactive-prompt validation).
    Returns {valid, slots: {role, capability, outcome}, errors[]}.

Bug fix bundled: sdk/src/query/roadmap.ts searchPhaseInContent now extracts
the mode field from **Mode:**, restoring parity with roadmap.cjs:120-123.
Without this, roadmap.get-phase --pick mode returned null on the native
dispatch path even when the phase had **Mode:** mvp set, causing MVP_MODE
to silently fall through to the config/false branch in every consuming
workflow. The original PRs Phase 1 (#2885) shipped the CJS parser but the
SDK port omitted the field; this fix brings them back to parity.

Workflows + agents updated to call the verbs:
  - plan-phase.md, execute-phase.md, verify-work.md, progress.md call
    phase.mvp-mode (one line replaces the duplicated bash chains).
  - execute-phase.md MVP+TDD gate calls task.is-behavior-adding.
  - verify-work.md goal guard calls user-story.validate.
  - mvp-phase.md interactive prompt validates via user-story.validate.
  - gsd-executor agent references task.is-behavior-adding instead of prose.
  - gsd-verifier agent references user-story.validate instead of inlined regex.

Tests: 24 new vitest tests in sdk/src/query/mvp.test.ts cover all three
verbs + the regression. Two existing contract tests (progress, verify)
updated to assert on the new verb shape. All 60 existing MVP contract
tests pass; golden integration suite (38 + 42 tests) passes.

Closes #3177

* fix(canary.2): unblock release gates for v1.50.0-canary.2

Run 25451329660 (Release SDK Bundle on dev, 2026-05-06T17:41) failed at the
test-suite step with 3 deterministic content/structure gate failures, all
attributable to the MVP umbrella integration in #3178 and the docs sweep
in #3180.

Failure 1: /gsd-mvp-phase undocumented in workflows/help.md
  - tests/bug-2954-help-md-slash-command-stubs.test.cjs requires every
    shipped commands/gsd/<X>.md to have a /gsd-<X> mention in help.md
  - PR #3180 updated docs/COMMANDS.md but missed help.md (which the AI
    agents load in-product)
  - Fix: add a /gsd-mvp-phase entry to help.md right before /gsd-plan-phase

Failures 2 + 3: execute-phase.md (1727) and plan-phase.md (1714) over XL budget (1700)
  - PR #3178 added MVP-mode verb calls (phase.mvp-mode, task.is-behavior-adding,
    user-story.validate) to both workflow files, pushing them past 1700 lines
  - Fix: bump XL_BUDGET 1700 -> 1800 with inline comment pointing at the
    structural follow-up (extract MVP bodies to <workflow>/modes/mvp.md per
    the discuss-phase/modes/ precedent)
  - The structural extract is the right long-term fix but is bigger than
    canary unblock scope; will land in a follow-up after canary cycles

Local verification:
  $ node --test tests/bug-2954-help-md-slash-command-stubs.test.cjs                 tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs
  tests 111  pass 111  fail 0

After this lands, re-trigger Release SDK Bundle on dev for v1.50.0-canary.2.

* chore(changeset): set PR number for canary.2 unblock

* fix(codex): generate-claude-md writes to AGENTS.md on Codex runtime

When config.runtime === 'codex' or GSD_RUNTIME=codex, override the
output target to AGENTS.md regardless of claude_md_path, so Codex
projects no longer have GSD sections written to CLAUDE.md by mistake.

Fixes both the CJS (gsd-tools) and SDK (profile-output.ts) paths.
Explicit --output flags are still honoured in both paths.

Closes #3163

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(plan-phase): remove agent: directive that caused OpenCode subagent dispatch

On OpenCode, any command with `agent: <name>` in its frontmatter is
auto-dispatched to a subagent context where the Agent tool is unavailable.
plan-phase.md and mvp-phase.md both carried `agent: gsd-planner`, causing
them to run inside gsd-planner's subagent context with no ability to spawn
researcher/planner/checker subagents — the orchestrator fell back to inline
execution for all three phases.

Fix: remove `agent: gsd-planner` from both command files so they run in the
main agent context. Also replace the stale `Task` tool in allowed-tools with
`Agent` (the correct dispatcher tool name post-#3168 rename).

Adds a structural regression test that parses YAML frontmatter of every
commands/gsd/*.md file and asserts no command carries an `agent:` directive.

Closes #3156

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(mvp): address CodeRabbit workflow and contract findings

* fix(execute-phase): use registered state.update query command

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-06 21:51:38 -04:00

222 lines
8.9 KiB
Markdown

<purpose>
Guide the user through MVP-mode planning for a phase. Prompts for an "As a / I want to / So that" user story, runs SPIDR splitting check on the story, writes the result to ROADMAP.md, and delegates to `/gsd plan-phase` (which auto-detects MVP via the roadmap mode field shipped in PRD Phase 1).
</purpose>
<required_reading>
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/user-story-template.md
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/spidr-splitting.md
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/planner-mvp-mode.md
</required_reading>
<runtime_note>
**Copilot (VS Code):** Use `vscode_askquestions` wherever this workflow calls `AskUserQuestion`. They are equivalent.
**TEXT_MODE fallback:** Set TEXT_MODE=true if `--text` is present in `$ARGUMENTS` OR `text_mode` from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number.
</runtime_note>
<process>
## 1. Parse and validate phase argument
Extract the phase number from `$ARGUMENTS` (integer or decimal like `2.1`). Optional flag: `--force` (allow operating on `in_progress` / `completed` phases).
If no argument:
```
ERROR: Phase number required
Usage: /gsd mvp-phase <phase-number>
Example: /gsd mvp-phase 1
Example: /gsd mvp-phase 2.1
```
Exit.
Normalize per `@~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/phase-argument-parsing.md` (zero-pad integer phases to two digits).
## 2. Validate phase exists and check status
```bash
PHASE_INFO=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.get-phase "${PHASE}")
PHASE_FOUND=$(echo "$PHASE_INFO" | jq -r '.found')
PHASE_NAME=$(echo "$PHASE_INFO" | jq -r '.phase_name')
PHASE_GOAL=$(echo "$PHASE_INFO" | jq -r '.goal')
PHASE_MODE=$(echo "$PHASE_INFO" | jq -r '.mode // ""')
PHASE_COMPLETE=$(echo "$PHASE_INFO" | jq -r '.roadmap_complete // false')
ANALYZE=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.analyze)
if [[ "$ANALYZE" == @file:* ]]; then ANALYZE=$(cat "${ANALYZE#@file:}"); fi
DISK_STATUS=$(echo "$ANALYZE" | jq -r --arg p "$PHASE" '.phases[] | select((.phase_number|tostring)==$p) | .disk_status' | head -1)
if [[ "$DISK_STATUS" == "complete" || "$PHASE_COMPLETE" == "true" ]]; then
STATUS="completed"
elif [[ "$DISK_STATUS" == "planned" || "$DISK_STATUS" == "partial" ]]; then
STATUS="in_progress"
else
STATUS="not_started"
fi
```
If `PHASE_FOUND` is `false`: error and exit. Suggest `/gsd add-phase` or `/gsd insert-phase` to create the phase first.
**Status guard.** If the phase is `in_progress` (has plans but not complete) or `completed`, refuse unless `--force` is in `$ARGUMENTS`:
```text
ERROR: Phase ${PHASE} is currently ${STATUS}.
Converting an active or completed phase to MVP mode mid-flight will
invalidate any existing plans and summaries.
To proceed anyway: /gsd mvp-phase ${PHASE} --force
```
**Already-MVP guard.** If `PHASE_MODE` is already `mvp`, surface this and ask whether to re-prompt the user story or abort:
> "Phase ${PHASE} is already in MVP mode with goal: «${PHASE_GOAL}». Re-run user-story prompts and SPIDR check?"
Use `AskUserQuestion` with options [Re-prompt / Abort]. On Abort, exit cleanly. On Re-prompt, proceed.
## 3. User story prompts
Run three sequential `AskUserQuestion` calls. Each is free-text. After all three, assemble into the canonical sentence per `@~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/user-story-template.md`:
**Prompt 1 — As a:**
> "As a [user role]?"
> (Examples: "new user", "admin", "signed-in customer", "API consumer")
**Prompt 2 — I want to:**
> "I want to [capability]?"
> (Examples: "register and log in", "upload a CSV", "see my dashboard")
**Prompt 3 — So that:**
> "So that [outcome]?"
> (Examples: "I can access my account", "I can bulk-import contacts", "I can see at a glance what needs attention")
Assemble:
```
USER_STORY="As a ${ROLE}, I want to ${CAPABILITY}, so that ${OUTCOME}."
```
If any of the three answers is empty or whitespace-only, error and re-prompt that single field. Do NOT proceed with a partial story.
**Validate via the centralized User Story validator.** The verb owns the canonical regex `/^As a .+, I want to .+, so that .+\.$/` and surfaces per-error guidance:
```bash
USER_STORY_RESULT=$(gsd-sdk query user-story.validate --story "$USER_STORY")
if [ "$(echo "$USER_STORY_RESULT" | jq -r '.valid')" != "true" ]; then
echo "$USER_STORY_RESULT" | jq -r '.errors[]' >&2
# Re-prompt the offending field(s) per surfaced errors, then re-run validation.
# Do not abort the workflow on first invalid draft.
RE_PROMPT_USER_STORY=true
fi
```
This guarantees the goal stored in ROADMAP.md will satisfy the same guard the verifier applies later.
If `RE_PROMPT_USER_STORY=true`, re-run only the offending prompt field(s), rebuild `USER_STORY`, and validate again before continuing.
## 4. SPIDR splitting check
Run the SPIDR rules from `@~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/spidr-splitting.md`. Briefly:
**Trigger evaluation.** Check the assembled `USER_STORY` against the four size signals from the reference (compound capabilities, multi-actor, length > 120 chars, vague capability). If none fire, **skip SPIDR** entirely — go to step 5.
**If SPIDR triggers.**
a) Restate the story to the user:
> "Your story: «${USER_STORY}»
>
> This story has [signal description, e.g., 'two compound capabilities joined by and']. Splitting it into multiple phases will produce a cleaner Walking Skeleton and reduce the risk of mid-phase scope creep.
>
> Want to walk through SPIDR splitting?"
Use `AskUserQuestion` with options [Yes, walk through SPIDR / No, proceed with the story as-is].
If "No": skip SPIDR, go to step 5.
If "Yes": continue to (b).
b) Ask which SPIDR axis fits best:
> "Which axis best fits how to split this story?"
Use `AskUserQuestion` with the five options from `spidr-splitting.md` (Spike / Paths / Interfaces / Data / Rules). Each option includes its targeted question as the description so the user can pick by understanding what each axis means.
c) Walk through the chosen axis with **one** targeted question (not all five). For example, if the user picked "Paths":
> "Does this feature have a happy path and one or more error/edge paths?"
Free-text response. Workflow parses to identify the split.
d) Produce a split proposal. Example:
> "Proposed split (Paths axis):
> - **Phase ${PHASE} (this one):** Happy path — ${HAPPY_STORY}
> - **Phase ${PHASE+1} (new):** Edge case — ${EDGE_STORY}
>
> Accept this split?"
Use `AskUserQuestion` [Accept / Modify / Reject].
- **Accept**: `USER_STORY` becomes the first split's story (`${HAPPY_STORY}` in the example). Surface the remaining splits as a list of `/gsd add-phase` invocations the user can run after this command completes — do NOT auto-create the new phases (preserve user control over numbering).
- **Modify**: re-prompt the splits one more time, then accept or reject.
- **Reject**: revert `USER_STORY` to the original, proceed without splitting.
## 5. Update ROADMAP.md
Read `ROADMAP.md`. Find the section for `Phase ${PHASE}`. Apply two edits:
**Edit 1 — Update Goal line.**
Find: `**Goal:** ${OLD_GOAL_TEXT}`
Replace with: `**Goal:** ${USER_STORY}`
**Edit 2 — Insert Mode line.**
If `**Mode:**` already exists in the section (replacing or re-running), update it to `**Mode:** mvp`.
If `**Mode:**` does not exist, insert `**Mode:** mvp` on the line immediately after `**Goal:**`.
Show the user a unified diff (lines being changed) and ask:
> "Apply these changes to ROADMAP.md?"
Use `AskUserQuestion` [Apply / Cancel]. On Cancel, exit without writing.
On Apply, write the updated `ROADMAP.md` atomically (read-edit-write).
## 6. Verify the write
```bash
NEW_MODE=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.get-phase "${PHASE}" --pick mode)
NEW_GOAL=$(gsd-sdk query roadmap.get-phase "${PHASE}" --pick goal)
```
Assert:
- `NEW_MODE` equals `mvp`
- `NEW_GOAL` equals the assembled user story
If either assertion fails, surface the discrepancy to the user and exit. Do not proceed to plan-phase delegation with a half-applied write.
## 7. Delegate to /gsd plan-phase
Invoke `/gsd plan-phase ${PHASE}` (no flags). Phase 1's MVP_MODE resolution chain (CLI flag → roadmap mode → config → false) will detect the new `**Mode:** mvp` line and run plan-phase in vertical-slice mode automatically.
The Walking Skeleton gate (also from Phase 1) will fire automatically if `${PHASE} == "01"` and there are zero prior phase summaries.
## 8. Surface deferred phase splits (if any)
If SPIDR produced a split in step 4, append a final user-facing message:
> "**SPIDR split deferred phases.**
>
> Your original story was split. The first slice is now planned via plan-phase.
> To create the remaining slice(s) as new phases, run:
>
> - `/gsd add-phase` — for the next slice: «${SPLIT_2_STORY}»
> - `/gsd add-phase` — for the next slice: «${SPLIT_3_STORY}»
>
> Each will be added to the end of the current milestone. You can then run
> `/gsd mvp-phase <new-phase-number>` on each to plan them as MVP slices."
## 9. Exit
Workflow ends. The phase is now in MVP mode with a planned PLAN.md, optionally with deferred follow-up phases surfaced for the user.
</process>