Thirty-four tests covering every branch in the reaping path that no test reached, which was all of the fail-closed ones. The function has always accepted an injectable dependency bag; nothing used it. Every existing test drove real git and injected only the clock and the liveness probe, so each guard that exists for a failure — an unreadable git dir, a null directory listing, an unresolvable remote ref, a missing pointer file, an unlocked sibling, an ambiguous remote — had never executed. They are now driven by injecting exactly the fault that selects them, and each asserts its specific status and reason rather than that something happened. The last one needed no new mechanism, only the right one. It was reported as unreachable without a cross-user PID, but the default liveness helper is reachable by not injecting over it and patching process.kill, which is the deterministic injection this repo requires over real OS conditions. Its three outcomes — EPERM, ESRCH, and a clean return — now assert their verdicts. The assertions were kill-tested rather than assumed. Against mutated copies of the built module, renaming the six reason strings fails eighteen tests, neutralising the fail-closed returns fails seven more, dropping the ambiguous-remote guard fails one, and removing the prune catch and its timeout guard fails both prune tests. Flipping the EPERM arm to false turns a skip into a reap and fails that test. Four places where production folds distinct causes into one verdict are recorded in the tests rather than papered over. A lock is too fresh whether its mtime is unreadable or merely recent; a branch tip fails to resolve for three different reasons; a PID reads as alive whether the owner lives or the probe threw. Where the return value cannot separate them the tests assert the git call sequence instead, and where even that cannot, the test says so. Six weak assertions already in the older file are replaced rather than left beside the new ones: five guarded their assertions behind `if (entry)`, so a missing entry skipped the check and passed, and one asserted only that the reaper returned a non-empty array. Three JSON parses wrapped in doesNotThrow now parse directly, so a malformed payload reports its own syntax error instead of a generic message. Refs #3057 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GSD Core
Git. Ship. Done.
English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
What is GSD Core
GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.
How it works
Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:
- Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
- Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
- Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
- Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
- Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one
Quickstart
npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.
On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.
Once installed, start a new project or onboard an existing repo:
/gsd-new-project # greenfield project
/gsd-onboard # existing codebase
New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase, or Onboarding an existing codebase for brownfield setup.
Documentation
What's new in 1.7.0 → docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md
Tutorials — learning by doing:
How-to guides — task-focused recipes:
Reference — authoritative facts:
Explanation — concepts and design decisions:
Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.
Why it works
Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.
Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.
Community
| Project | Platform |
|---|---|
| gsd-opencode | Original OpenCode port |
| Discord | Community support |
Star History
License
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.