352876ff0c
* test(#2315): regression test for review.default_reviewers precedence A bare /gsd-plan-review-convergence invocation (no reviewer flags) is supposed to let users configure a persistent reviewer lineup via review.default_reviewers and just run the loop. Instead, the orchestrator's argument parser silently discards that configuration and forces --codex on every no-flag invocation — with no warning that the configured reviewers were ignored. This commit adds a regression test that fails against the pre-fix workflow (the buggy unconditional --codex fallback is still present at this commit) and passes after the fix lands: - Structural: the workflow must NOT contain an unconditional 'if [ -z "$REVIEWER_FLAGS" ]; then REVIEWER_FLAGS="--codex"; fi' line before the workflow.plan_review_convergence config gate. - Structural: the workflow must query review.default_reviewers AFTER the config gate and document that empty REVIEWER_FLAGS lets gsd-review apply the default. - Behavioral: matrix across {configured, unset, empty-array, explicit-flag} invoking the actual deployed parse + resolution blocks with a stubbed gsd_run. Also updates two existing tests whose assertions the fix makes stale: - #2293 behavioral: endMarker was the buggy unconditional fallback line; the bare invocation assertion was 'run("5") === "--codex"'. Both flip post-fix (endMarker is now the last --all grep line; bare invocation returns empty from the parse block, default applied later in step 1.5). - command-default-claim: the pre-fix command documented '--codex (default if no reviewer specified)' which was the user-facing mirror of the bug. The assertion now requires the command to document the review.default_reviewers precedence. * fix(#2315): respect review.default_reviewers in bare convergence invocation Root cause: plan-review-convergence.md step 1 (Parse and Normalize Arguments) contained an unconditional fallback that set REVIEWER_FLAGS=\"--codex\" whenever no explicit reviewer flag was supplied. This value was then interpolated verbatim into the gsd-review args, so gsd-review saw --codex as an explicit flag (precedence rule 1) and never reached rule 3 (review.default_reviewers). The same path silently dropped any configured review.reviewer_instances (instances participate ONLY via review.default_reviewers per ADR-1517). Fix: - Remove the unconditional --codex fallback from step 1. - Add a config-gated resolution in step 1.5 (after CONVERGENCE_ENABLED check) that queries review.default_reviewers and either leaves REVIEWER_FLAGS empty (letting gsd-review apply its own rule-3 default) or falls back to --codex when no default is configured — preserving the pre-fix default for unconfigured users (AC3). - Replace the banner {REVIEWER_FLAGS} token with {REVIEWER_DISPLAY} so the startup banner reflects what will actually run (AC4), not a hardcoded value. The fix upholds the documented precedence contract (ADR-0011, ADR-0015) that the bug was actively violating. Explicit-flag invocations (--gemini, --all, etc.) are unaffected (AC5). References: #2315; ADR-0011 (review.default_reviewers precedence); ADR-0015 (autonomous cross-AI convergence); ADR-1517 (reviewer instances). * chore(#2315): bump plan-review-convergence.md baseline + changeset - Bump plan-review-convergence.md size baseline 23713 → 25536 (the new step-1.5 default-resolution block). - Add .changeset/plucky-yaks-roar.md documenting the user-visible change. * fix(#2315): restore /gsd: colon syntax + skip behavioral test when jq missing Two follow-ups to the #2315 fix discovered by gsd-test: 1. The fix commit accidentally regressed the slash-command namespace in the disabled-feature exit message: /gsd:plan-review-convergence (correct, from PR #3452) became /gsd-plan-review-convergence (retired dash syntax). The slash-command-namespace invariant test caught this. Restored the colon form. 2. The behavioral test exercises the deployed reviewer-resolution block, which pipes through jq. jq is a documented production dependency (review.md:244 "install jq if missing") and is present in every production deployment, but is NOT on PATH in the gsd-test linux-node{22,24} containers (same constraint as tests/opencode-review-reconstruction. property.test.cjs). Without jq, the printf|jq pipeline fails silently, the ||echo 0 fallback yields DEFAULT_REVIEWERS_COUNT=0, and the resolution falls through to the --codex branch — producing a false negative. Added a jqAvailable guard at module load (matching the existing pattern) and skip the behavioral test when jq is absent. The structural tests (no bash execution) still run and validate the fix. * chore(#2315): regenerate golden-install-parity fixtures Source changes to plan-review-convergence.md (workflow + skill mirror + command doc) changed the install-tree hashes. Regenerated via 'npm run gen:golden' after rebuilding gsd-core/bin/lib/install-engine.cjs ('npm run build:lib') — the on-disk lib was stale relative to src/install-engine.cts (isSymlinkedDestOptIn) and blocked fixture gen. * test(#2315): address review findings — strengthen structural tests + property test Code-review + security-review (isolated subagent passes) surfaced Low/Nit findings; this commit addresses the test-side findings: - Structural test 1 ("unconditional --codex one-liner") now asserts the buggy line is absent EVERYWHERE, not just before the config gate. The earlier assertion allowed a maintainer to re-add the line after the gate (passing the structural test) while the bug would still bite at runtime before the gate runs. - Structural test 4 ("banner uses REVIEWER_DISPLAY") now asserts the LITERAL banner placeholder "Reviewers: {REVIEWER_DISPLAY}" and forbids "Reviewers: {REVIEWER_FLAGS}". The earlier workflow.includes( "REVIEWER_DISPLAY") was satisfied by a comment mention. - New structural test for command/skill content parity: both files must document the review.default_reviewers precedence on the --codex flag (catches a manual edit to one that the gen:plugin-skills mirror misses). - Behavioral test stub now passes default_reviewers via env var ($GSD_TEST_DEFAULT_REVIEWERS) instead of inline-interpolating into a bash single-quoted string. Removes the (currently-safe) fragility where a future test input containing a single quote would close the bash quote and execute as bash under execFileSync. - New property test (fast-check, numRuns=25) for the JSON-classification contract: non-empty arrays of slugs -> empty REVIEWER_FLAGS; empty array / scalar JSON / malformed JSON -> --codex fallback. Locks the parser contract per CLAUDE.md mandate. * fix(#2315): address review findings — defensive jq-missing warning + banner cleanup Code-review surfaced two Low-severity workflow-side findings: - Defensive jq-missing warning: if jq is not on PATH in production (it is a documented dependency per review.md:244, but the dependency can be absent in degraded environments), the printf|jq pipeline fails silently to "0" and a user with review.default_reviewers configured gets --codex with no indication their configured default was unreadable. Added a command -v jq guard at the top of the resolution that falls back to --codex AND emits a stderr warning explaining the reason. This makes the failure diagnosable instead of silently reproducing the #2315 override. - Banner leading-space cleanup: REVIEWER_FLAGS accumulates with a leading space ("$REVIEWER_FLAGS --gemini" from ""), so the explicit-flag branch of REVIEWER_DISPLAY="$REVIEWER_FLAGS" rendered "Reviewers: --gemini" (double space). Pre-existing but worth fixing alongside the AC4 banner work. Strip one leading space with the ${VAR# } parameter expansion in the explicit-flag branch only (the configured-default and --codex branches already produce clean strings). * chore(#2315): bump plan-review-convergence.md baseline + regen golden fixtures The defensive jq-missing warning grew plan-review-convergence.md (25536 -> 26285 bytes). Bumps the per-file baseline snapshot and regenerates the golden-install-parity fixtures for the resulting install-tree hash changes. * chore(#2315): backfill pr:2451 in .changeset/plucky-yaks-roar.md
62 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
62 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: gsd:plan-review-convergence
|
|
description: "Cross-AI plan convergence - replan until review concerns are resolved."
|
|
argument-hint: "<phase> [--codex] [--gemini] [--claude] [--opencode] [--ollama] [--lm-studio] [--llama-cpp] [--agy] [--text] [--ws <name>] [--all] [--max-cycles N]"
|
|
allowed-tools:
|
|
- Read
|
|
- Write
|
|
- Bash
|
|
- Glob
|
|
- Grep
|
|
- Agent
|
|
- Skill
|
|
- AskUserQuestion
|
|
requires: [phase, review]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
<objective>
|
|
Cross-AI plan convergence loop — an outer revision gate around gsd-review and gsd-planner.
|
|
Repeatedly: review plans with external AI CLIs → if HIGH or actionable non-HIGH concerns remain → replan with --reviews feedback → re-review. Stops when no unresolved HIGH concerns or actionable MEDIUM/LOW findings remain outside PLAN.md, or when max cycles is reached.
|
|
|
|
**Flow:** Skill("gsd-plan-phase") → Agent→Skill("gsd-review") → check unresolved HIGH + actionable non-HIGH → Skill("gsd-plan-phase --reviews") → Agent→Skill("gsd-review") → ... → Converge or escalate
|
|
|
|
Replaces gsd-plan-phase's internal gsd-plan-checker with external AI reviewers (codex, gemini, etc.). Plan-phase runs **inline** (bare Skill at depth 0) so it can spawn gsd-planner/gsd-plan-checker at depth 1. Review runs inside an isolated Agent (gsd-review is a Bash leaf — no sub-agents needed). Orchestrator only does loop control.
|
|
|
|
**Orchestrator role:** Parse arguments, validate phase, run plan-phase inline (Skill at depth 0), spawn an Agent for gsd-review, check unresolved HIGH and actionable non-HIGH counts, stall detection, escalation gate.
|
|
</objective>
|
|
|
|
<execution_context>
|
|
@$HOME/.claude/gsd-core/workflows/plan-review-convergence.md
|
|
@$HOME/.claude/gsd-core/references/revision-loop.md
|
|
@$HOME/.claude/gsd-core/references/gates.md
|
|
@$HOME/.claude/gsd-core/references/agent-contracts.md
|
|
</execution_context>
|
|
|
|
<runtime_note>
|
|
**Copilot (VS Code):** Use `vscode_askquestions` wherever this workflow calls `AskUserQuestion`. They are equivalent — `vscode_askquestions` is the VS Code Copilot implementation of the same interactive question API. Do not skip questioning steps because `AskUserQuestion` appears unavailable; use `vscode_askquestions` instead.
|
|
</runtime_note>
|
|
|
|
<context>
|
|
Phase number: extracted from $ARGUMENTS (required)
|
|
|
|
**Flags:**
|
|
- `--codex` — Use Codex CLI as reviewer (default if no reviewer flag given AND `review.default_reviewers` is unset; otherwise `review.default_reviewers` wins per ADR-0011 — #2315)
|
|
- `--gemini` — Use Gemini CLI as reviewer
|
|
- `--agy` / `--antigravity` — Use Antigravity CLI as reviewer (successor to the discontinued Gemini CLI)
|
|
- `--claude` — Use Claude CLI as reviewer (separate session)
|
|
- `--opencode` — Use OpenCode as reviewer
|
|
- `--ollama` — Use local Ollama server as reviewer (OpenAI-compatible, default host `http://localhost:11434`; configure model via `review.models.ollama`)
|
|
- `--lm-studio` — Use local LM Studio server as reviewer (OpenAI-compatible, default host `http://localhost:1234`; configure model via `review.models.lm_studio`)
|
|
- `--llama-cpp` — Use local llama.cpp server as reviewer (OpenAI-compatible, default host `http://localhost:8080`; configure model via `review.models.llama_cpp`)
|
|
- `--all` — Use all available CLIs and running local model servers
|
|
- `--max-cycles N` — Maximum replan→review cycles (default: 3)
|
|
|
|
**Feature gate:** This command requires `workflow.plan_review_convergence=true`. Enable with:
|
|
`gsd config-set workflow.plan_review_convergence true`
|
|
</context>
|
|
|
|
<process>
|
|
Execute end-to-end.
|
|
Preserve all workflow gates (pre-flight, revision loop, stall detection, escalation).
|
|
</process>
|