Files
msd-core/gsd-core/references/ui-consideration-probe.md
Dave 29120ea0aa docs(#1867): ui-consideration-probe reference + docs-parity test (ADPT-02)
Reference doc mirrors edge-probe.md structure but links rather than re-argues;
states the MIXED-axis boundary (closed compiled shape-rooted subset here; open
UX subset - real-time/offline, a11y depth, i18n/RTL - prose-owned in
domain-probes.md). Docs-parity test pins doc taxonomy ids == code UI_TAXONOMY
ids and asserts disjointness from domain-probes.md topics (ADR-456
runtime-contract exemption, see #1867).
2026-07-10 14:40:03 -04:00

5.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

UI-Consideration Probe — Spec-Completeness Reference

The third adapter of the shared probe-core resolution model (ADR-550 Decision 7), on the UI element/state axis. It surfaces the shape-rooted UI state considerations a UI-SPEC must resolve before a dimension may PASS — the visual analog of the requirement-side edge-probe, reusing its exact lifecycle, validators, and plan-phase lift (see edge-probe.md for the shared status×verification model — this doc does not re-argue it).

Axis boundary (this is a MIXED axis). This compiled taxonomy covers ONLY the finite, project-independent shape-rooted content/robustness states. The open, domain/UX-dependent considerations — real-time/offline/optimistic-UI, deep accessibility (WCAG breadth), internationalization / RTL depth, and emerging interaction paradigms — are open-ended and are prose-owned in the companion domain-probes.md technology/UX bank, NOT here. Forcing them into a closed compiled taxonomy is the wrong model.

Inputs

A list of UI elements, each a { id, text, elements? } record where text is the researcher-authored description and elements is an optional author-supplied override of the element classification. The six element kinds are: form, list-collection, nav, media, interactive-control, static-content. When elements is absent, a heuristic classifier proposes kinds from the prose (propose-then-confirm) — the author may correct the kind.

Taxonomy (8 categories)

Closed and small by design: the finite, project-independent content/robustness states every UI surface must account for. Growth toward open UX topics happens in domain-probes.md, not by bloating this closed core.

id name applies to element kinds consideration question
empty Empty / no data form, list-collection, media What is shown when there is no data — zero items, an unfilled form, or absent media?
loading Loading / in-flight form, list-collection, media, nav What is shown while data or content is still loading (skeleton, spinner, progressive reveal)?
error Error / failure form, list-collection, media, nav What is shown when the load or submit fails (message, retry affordance, partial fallback)?
populated Populated / happy path list-collection, media What does the normal populated (happy-path) state look like at a typical volume of content?
partial Partial / incomplete form, list-collection What is shown for partial or incomplete data — some fields or rows present, others missing?
overflow Overflow / truncation list-collection, nav, static-content What happens when content exceeds its container — scroll, clip, wrap, or truncate?
zero-one-many Zero / one / many list-collection How does the layout read at zero, one, and many items (singular vs plural copy, spacing)?
long-text Long text form, static-content, interactive-control, nav What happens with unusually long text — truncation, wrapping, ellipsis, or reflow?

Relevance filter + resolution states

The probe reuses the edge-probe rails verbatim (ADR-550 Decision 7 — see edge-probe.md for the full model):

  1. Relevance filter first. Classify each element's kind(s), then raise only the categories whose applies to element kinds intersect. A static label is never asked about loading or empty state — that is what makes an unresolved consideration meaningful.
  2. Dismissal requires a reason string. Silence is not a resolution; the reason is the audit trail.
  3. Zero-classification surfaces one unclassified candidate (#1110). An element whose prose matched no kind cue yields exactly one soft unclassified — review manually item (category: "unclassified", status: "unresolved") — never a silent drop, never a guessed kind. unclassified is a review signal, not a ninth taxonomy category; an explicit elements: [] opt-out stays silent.

Each raised consideration carries the shared two orthogonal axes — status (resolved | dismissed | unresolved) and, when resolved, a verification tier (explicit | backstop). A backstop consideration lifts into must_haves.truths and, at verify time, is confirmed only by explicit evidence (a wired held-out/property test) or routes to insufficient_spec → human_needed — never a silent pass (the honest-verifier disposition, #1154). See honest-verifier.md.

Closed / open boundary

The 8 ids above are the closed, compiled subset — finite and project-independent, so a compiled taxonomy is legitimate (the same property that makes edge-probe's data-shape taxonomy closed). The open subset is prose-owned in domain-probes.md: real-time/offline/optimistic-UI, deep accessibility (WCAG breadth), i18n / RTL depth, and emerging interaction paradigms (gesture/voice/reduced-motion/print) are open-ended and cue-triggered — they do not belong in this closed taxonomy. This probe complements the gsd-ui-checker six quality dimensions (it adds a state-coverage axis); it does not change the BLOCK/FLAG/PASS enum or the dimensions themselves.