Files
msd-core/gsd-core/references/ui-consideration-probe.md
Dave 29120ea0aa docs(#1867): ui-consideration-probe reference + docs-parity test (ADPT-02)
Reference doc mirrors edge-probe.md structure but links rather than re-argues;
states the MIXED-axis boundary (closed compiled shape-rooted subset here; open
UX subset - real-time/offline, a11y depth, i18n/RTL - prose-owned in
domain-probes.md). Docs-parity test pins doc taxonomy ids == code UI_TAXONOMY
ids and asserts disjointness from domain-probes.md topics (ADR-456
runtime-contract exemption, see #1867).
2026-07-10 14:40:03 -04:00

74 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# UI-Consideration Probe — Spec-Completeness Reference
The **third** adapter of the shared `probe-core` resolution model (ADR-550 Decision 7), on
the **UI element/state axis**. It surfaces the shape-rooted UI *state* considerations a
UI-SPEC must resolve before a dimension may PASS — the visual analog of the requirement-side
[edge-probe](./edge-probe.md), reusing its exact lifecycle, validators, and plan-phase lift
(see edge-probe.md for the shared status×verification model — this doc does not re-argue it).
**Axis boundary (this is a MIXED axis).** This compiled taxonomy covers ONLY the finite,
project-independent shape-rooted content/robustness states. The **open**, domain/UX-dependent
considerations — real-time/offline/optimistic-UI, deep accessibility (WCAG breadth),
internationalization / RTL depth, and emerging interaction paradigms — are open-ended and are
prose-owned in the companion [domain-probes.md](./domain-probes.md) technology/UX bank, NOT
here. Forcing them into a closed compiled taxonomy is the wrong model.
## Inputs
A list of UI elements, each a `{ id, text, elements? }` record where `text` is the
researcher-authored description and `elements` is an optional author-supplied override of the
element classification. The six element kinds are: `form`, `list-collection`, `nav`, `media`,
`interactive-control`, `static-content`. When `elements` is absent, a heuristic classifier
proposes kinds from the prose (propose-then-confirm) — the author may correct the kind.
## Taxonomy (8 categories)
Closed and small by design: the finite, project-independent content/robustness states every
UI surface must account for. Growth toward open UX topics happens in `domain-probes.md`, not by
bloating this closed core.
| id | name | applies to element kinds | consideration question |
|----|------|--------------------------|------------------------|
| empty | Empty / no data | form, list-collection, media | What is shown when there is no data — zero items, an unfilled form, or absent media? |
| loading | Loading / in-flight | form, list-collection, media, nav | What is shown while data or content is still loading (skeleton, spinner, progressive reveal)? |
| error | Error / failure | form, list-collection, media, nav | What is shown when the load or submit fails (message, retry affordance, partial fallback)? |
| populated | Populated / happy path | list-collection, media | What does the normal populated (happy-path) state look like at a typical volume of content? |
| partial | Partial / incomplete | form, list-collection | What is shown for partial or incomplete data — some fields or rows present, others missing? |
| overflow | Overflow / truncation | list-collection, nav, static-content | What happens when content exceeds its container — scroll, clip, wrap, or truncate? |
| zero-one-many | Zero / one / many | list-collection | How does the layout read at zero, one, and many items (singular vs plural copy, spacing)? |
| long-text | Long text | form, static-content, interactive-control, nav | What happens with unusually long text — truncation, wrapping, ellipsis, or reflow? |
## Relevance filter + resolution states
The probe reuses the edge-probe rails verbatim (ADR-550 Decision 7 — see
[edge-probe.md](./edge-probe.md#relevance-filter--resolution-states) for the full model):
1. **Relevance filter first.** Classify each element's kind(s), then raise only the categories
whose `applies to element kinds` intersect. A static label is never asked about loading or
empty state — that is what makes an unresolved consideration meaningful.
2. **Dismissal requires a reason string.** Silence is not a resolution; the reason is the audit
trail.
3. **Zero-classification surfaces one `unclassified` candidate (#1110).** An element whose prose
matched no kind cue yields exactly one soft `unclassified — review manually` item
(`category: "unclassified"`, `status: "unresolved"`) — never a silent drop, never a guessed
kind. `unclassified` is a review signal, **not** a ninth taxonomy category; an explicit
`elements: []` opt-out stays silent.
Each raised consideration carries the shared two orthogonal axes — `status`
(`resolved | dismissed | unresolved`) and, when resolved, a `verification` tier
(`explicit | backstop`). A `backstop` consideration lifts into `must_haves.truths` and, at
verify time, is confirmed only by explicit evidence (a wired held-out/property test) or routes
to `insufficient_spec → human_needed` — never a silent pass (the honest-verifier disposition,
#1154). See [honest-verifier.md](./honest-verifier.md).
## Closed / open boundary
The **8 ids above are the closed, compiled subset** — finite and project-independent, so a
compiled taxonomy is legitimate (the same property that makes edge-probe's data-shape taxonomy
closed). The **open subset is prose-owned in [domain-probes.md](./domain-probes.md)**:
real-time/offline/optimistic-UI, deep accessibility (WCAG breadth), i18n / RTL depth, and
emerging interaction paradigms (gesture/voice/reduced-motion/print) are open-ended and
cue-triggered — they do not belong in this closed taxonomy. This probe **complements** the
`gsd-ui-checker` six quality dimensions (it adds a state-coverage axis); it does not change the
BLOCK/FLAG/PASS enum or the dimensions themselves.