Fernando Castillo b01089c05a fix(#3689): use find instead of chained ls for continue-here scan (#3693)
* fix(#3689): use find instead of chained ls for continue-here scan

The check_incomplete_work step in resume-project.md chained six bare-glob
ls arguments to discover .planning/.continue-here*.md handoff files.
Under zsh's default NOMATCH option (macOS default shell), the first
non-matching glob aborts the entire command during word-expansion,
silently dropping every pattern after it — including
.planning/.continue-here*.md, which holds the canonical pause checkpoint
for default-context handoffs. The 2>/dev/null || true guard suppresses
ls's own stderr / exit code but has no effect on the shell's pre-exec
glob-abort.

Replace the chain with two find invocations:
  find .planning -maxdepth 3 -name '.continue-here*.md' -print 2>/dev/null
  find . -maxdepth 1 -name '.continue-here*.md' -print 2>/dev/null

find does not use shell glob expansion and tolerates absent directories
on both bash and zsh.

Adds tests/bug-3689-resume-glob-nomatch.test.cjs covering:
  - zsh -o nomatch with .planning/.continue-here-AT-1234.md present and
    no spike/sketch/deliberation subdirs (the regression scenario)
  - bash default, same layout
  - zsh -o nomatch with no checkpoints anywhere (clean exit, no output)
  - text invariant: resume-project.md no longer carries the chained-ls
    pattern and does carry the find-based scan

Closes #3689

* fix(#3689): guard find commands with || true for Windows safety

Restore the trailing '|| true' guard that the original chained ls had,
per the windows-robustness.test.cjs invariant (informational bash
commands in critical workflows must not let an exit-1 from find on
exotic platforms tank the resume-project.md flow).

* fix(#3689): address CodeRabbit review feedback

- Set changeset frontmatter pr: 3693 (was 3690 placeholder); the release-
  note link now points at the right PR.
- Use createTempDir / cleanup from tests/helpers.cjs instead of local
  tmpdir/cleanup wrappers, per repo test standards.

* fix(#3689): update bug-3446 discovery contract to new find-based scan

bug-3446 enforced three text invariants on the chained-ls implementation
that this PR replaces with find. Update the assertions to verify the
same three discovery paths are still covered:

- .planning/.continue-here*.md at depth 1 -> find .planning -maxdepth 3
- .planning/sketches/SKETCH-NNN/.continue-here*.md at depth 3 -> same
  find with -maxdepth >= 3 (assertion now reads the actual depth and
  enforces a lower bound so future changes can deepen but not shallow it)
- repo-root .continue-here*.md legacy fallback -> find . -maxdepth 1

The discovery contract is preserved; only the implementation under
inspection changes.

* test(#3689): convert bug-3446 from source-grep to behavioral assertions

CodeRabbit flagged the text-regex assertions on the workflow source as a
violation of the no-source-grep testing standard. Replace them with a
behavioral integration test that:

  1. Extracts the actual check_incomplete_work bash block from
     resume-project.md (so the test stays in sync with whatever the
     workflow does, no string match required).
  2. Plants three handoff files in a temp dir covering the three
     discovery surfaces bug #3446 originally filed:
     - .planning/.continue-here.md (depth 1 under .planning)
     - .planning/sketches/SKETCH-001/.continue-here.md (depth 3)
     - ./.continue-here.md (legacy repo root)
  3. Runs the snippet under bash and asserts each planted file appears
     in stdout.

Same contract; now validated through runtime behavior instead of
regex-on-file.

* fix(#3689): use \\r?\\n in bash-fence regex for Windows CRLF parity

The Windows test-parity guard at tests/windows-test-parity-guard.test.cjs:106
flags any new fence-extraction regex that uses a literal \\n after the
language tag — on Windows CRLF the byte after `bash` is \\r, the regex
silently fails to match, and the extracted snippet is empty. Switch to
the canonical /```(?:bash|sh)\\r?\\n([\\s\\S]*?)```/ pattern.

* fix(#3689): harden extractCheckBlock against missing </step> and CRLF closing fence

Per CodeRabbit review: assert that the closing </step> tag is present before
slicing (otherwise slice(stepStart, -1) silently grabs the wrong block and
the test fails misleadingly), and add \r?\n to the closing fence as well so
Windows CRLF doesn't sneak a stray carriage return into the captured snippet.
2026-05-18 12:42:43 -04:00
2026-05-15 18:16:33 -04:00

GET SHIT DONE

English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어

A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.

Solves context rot — the quality degradation that happens as your AI fills its context window.

npm version npm downloads Tests Discord X (Twitter) $GSD Token GitHub stars License


npx get-shit-done-cc@latest

Works on Mac, Windows, and Linux.


GSD Install


"If you know clearly what you want, this WILL build it for you. No bs."

"I've done SpecKit, OpenSpec and Taskmaster — this has produced the best results for me."

"By far the most powerful addition to my Claude Code. Nothing over-engineered. Literally just gets shit done."


Trusted by engineers at Amazon, Google, Shopify, and Webflow.


Important

Returning to GSD?

Run /gsd-map-codebase to re-index your codebase, then /gsd-new-project to rebuild GSD's planning context. Your code is fine — GSD just needs its context rebuilt. See the CHANGELOG for what's new.


Why I Built This

I'm a solo developer. I don't write code — Claude Code does.

Other spec-driven tools exist, but they're all built for 50-person engineering orgs — sprint ceremonies, story points, stakeholder syncs, Jira workflows. I'm not that. I'm a creative person trying to build great things consistently.

So I built GSD. The complexity is in the system, not in your workflow. Behind the scenes: context engineering, XML prompt formatting, subagent orchestration, state management. What you see: a few commands that just work.

The system gives Claude everything it needs to do the work and verify it. I trust the workflow. It just does a good job.

— TÂCHES


How It Works

The loop is six commands. Each one does exactly one thing.

1. Initialize

/gsd-new-project

Questions → research → requirements → roadmap. You approve it, then you're ready to build.

Already have code? Run /gsd-map-codebase first. It analyzes your stack, architecture, and conventions so /gsd-new-project asks the right questions.

2. Discuss

/gsd-discuss-phase 1

Your roadmap has a sentence per phase. That's not enough to build it the way you imagine it. Discuss captures your decisions before anything gets planned: layouts, API shapes, error handling, data structures — whatever gray areas exist for this specific phase.

The output feeds directly into research and planning. Skip it, get reasonable defaults. Use it, get your vision.

3. Plan

/gsd-plan-phase 1

Research → plan → verify, in a loop until the plans pass. Each plan is small enough to execute in a fresh context window.

4. Execute

/gsd-execute-phase 1

Plans run in parallel waves. Each executor gets a fresh 200k-token context. Each task gets its own atomic commit. Walk away, come back to completed work with a clean git history.

Your main context window stays at 30–40%. The work happens in the subagents.

5. Verify

/gsd-verify-work 1

Walk through what was built. Anything broken gets a diagnosed fix plan — ready for immediate re-execution. You don't debug manually; you just run execute again.

6. Repeat → Ship

/gsd-ship 1
/gsd-complete-milestone
/gsd-new-milestone

Loop discuss → plan → execute → verify → ship until the milestone is done. Then archive, tag, and start the next one fresh.


Getting Started

npx get-shit-done-cc@latest

The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally.

claude --dangerously-skip-permissions

GSD is built for frictionless automation. Skip-permissions is how it's intended to run.

Install only the skills you need with --profile=core (six core-loop skills), --profile=standard (core + phase management), or the default full install. Profiles compose: --profile=core,audit. --minimal is an alias for --profile=core. See docs/USER-GUIDE.md for the full walkthrough, non-interactive install flags for all 15 runtimes, and permissions configuration. See ADR-0011 for the profile model and runtime surface control.

Current release highlights are in docs/RELEASE-v1.42.1.md: package legitimacy checks, safer installer migrations, runtime surface control, custom ship PR sections, reviewer defaults, fallow structural review, and quota-aware execution recovery.


Commands

The main loop:

Command What it does
/gsd-new-project Questions → research → requirements → roadmap
/gsd-discuss-phase [N] Capture implementation decisions before planning
/gsd-plan-phase [N] Research + plan + verify
/gsd-execute-phase <N> Execute plans in parallel waves
/gsd-verify-work [N] Manual acceptance testing
/gsd-ship [N] Create PR from verified phase work
/gsd-progress --next Auto-detect and run the next step
/gsd-complete-milestone Archive milestone and tag release
/gsd-new-milestone Start next version
/gsd:surface Enable/disable skill clusters at runtime without reinstall

For ad-hoc tasks, autonomous mode, codebase analysis, forensics, and the full command surface — see docs/COMMANDS.md.


Why It Works

Three things most AI-coding setups get wrong:

1. Context bloat. As a session grows, quality degrades. GSD keeps your main context clean by doing the heavy work in fresh subagent contexts. Researchers, planners, and executors each start fresh with exactly what they need.

2. No shared memory. GSD maintains structured artifacts that survive session boundaries: PROJECT.md (vision), REQUIREMENTS.md (scope), ROADMAP.md (where you're going), STATE.md (current position and decisions), CONTEXT.md (per-phase implementation decisions). Every new session loads these and knows exactly where things stand.

3. No verification. Code that "runs" isn't code that "works." GSD's verify step walks you through what was built, diagnoses failures with dedicated debug agents, and generates fix plans before you declare a phase done.

See docs/ARCHITECTURE.md for how the multi-agent orchestration and context engineering work in detail.


Configuration

Settings live in .planning/config.json. Configure during /gsd-new-project or update with /gsd-settings.

Key dials:

Setting What it controls
mode interactive (confirm each step) or yolo (auto-approve)
Model profiles quality / balanced / budget — controls which model each agent uses
workflow.research / plan_check / verifier Toggle the quality agents that add tokens and time
parallelization.enabled Run independent plans simultaneously

Optional structural review: set code_quality.fallow.enabled to true to add a fallow pre-pass to /gsd-code-review. GSD writes .planning/phases/<phase>/FALLOW.json and surfaces a Structural Findings (fallow) section in REVIEW.md. Install with npm install -D fallow@^2.70.0 (or system-wide via cargo install fallow; note that the Rust binary's JSON schema must match the documented v2.70+ contract — older versions may produce silent zero-finding output).

Package legitimacy checks are built into the research, planning, and execution path: recommended dependencies get audited, unverified packages require a human checkpoint, and failed installs stop instead of trying similarly named alternatives.

For the full configuration reference — all settings, git branching strategies, per-runtime model overrides, workstream config inheritance, agent skills injection — see docs/CONFIGURATION.md.


Documentation

Doc What's in it
User Guide End-to-end walkthrough, install options, all runtime flags, configuration reference
Commands Every command with flags and examples
Configuration Full config schema, model profiles, git branching
Architecture How the multi-agent orchestration works
CLI Tools gsd-sdk query and programmatic SDK dispatch seams
Features Complete feature index
Changelog What changed in each release

Troubleshooting

Commands not showing up? Restart your runtime after install. GSD installs to ~/.claude/skills/gsd-*/ (Claude Code), ~/.codex/skills/gsd-*/ (Codex), or the equivalent for your runtime.

Codex users — minimum supported CLI version is 0.130.0. Codex CLI 0.130.0 (release notes) removed extra-skill-roots discovery via openai/codex#21485; from that version onward Codex discovers skills from standard roots (including ~/.codex/skills/<name>/SKILL.md). GSD installs there directly. Earlier Codex CLI versions may still discover additional roots, which can surface duplicate gsd-* entries (one from extra-roots discovery, one from ~/.codex/skills/); restart Codex after install and either upgrade or accept the duplicate listing.

Something broken? Re-run the installer — it's idempotent:

npx get-shit-done-cc@latest

Containers or Docker? Set CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR before installing to avoid tilde-expansion issues:

CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR=/home/youruser/.claude npx get-shit-done-cc --global

Full troubleshooting and uninstall instructions in docs/USER-GUIDE.md.


Community

Project Platform
gsd-opencode Original OpenCode port
Discord Community support

Star History

Star History Chart

License

MIT License. See LICENSE for details.


Claude Code is powerful. GSD makes it reliable.

Description
No description provided
Readme MIT 77 MiB
Languages
JavaScript 82.3%
TypeScript 17.4%
Shell 0.3%