bcefffc132
* test(3578): failing-first coverage for milestone status on partial completion Completing phase 2 of a 4-phase milestone sets frontmatter status: completed while the same call correctly writes completed_phases: 2 / total_phases: 4. These tests fail on that conflation and pin the boundary either side of it (3-of-4 must not complete, 4-of-4 must), plus milestone_name byte-identity and the 1-of-1 case that legitimately does complete. * fix(3578): derive milestone status from phase counters, not phase-completion prose RED proven at 253843b4 (tests-only): the 2-of-4 and 3-of-4 cases failed while the 4-of-4, milestone_name and 1-of-1 controls passed — the conflation, and nothing else. state complete-phase writes body prose `Phase N complete`. normalizeStateStatus matches 'complete' as a case-insensitive SUBSTRING, so phase-level prose collapsed into milestone-level frontmatter status: completed — even while the same call correctly derived completed_phases: 2 / total_phases: 4 / percent: 50. Check ORDER is why the sibling surface stays correct: completePhaseCore writes 'Ready to plan' for non-final phases, hitting the 'planning' arm before 'complete'. The two phase-completion surfaces disagreed and this was the conflated one — a violation of ADR-2207, which gives milestone termination solely to milestoneCompleteCore. buildStateFrontmatter now honors a 'completed' normalization from phase-completion prose only when the counters it already derived agree. Scoped deliberately: - anchored to bare `Phase <token> complete`, so 'All phases complete' and '<version> milestone complete' are untouched (both out of scope). Verified by executing the guard's own regex from source against both forms. - gated on counter trustworthiness (COMPLETE disk scope, finite counts, positive denominator) so an unknown scope withholds rather than guessing 'not complete', which would be the mirror-image bug - normalizeStateStatus itself is NOT modified — it feeds every state.* write and the read path A 1-of-1 milestone still yields 'completed' by the rule, not by exemption, so the #1255 pinning test stays green on its merits. Fixes #3578 * fix(3578): gate the guard on milestone boundedness and close the review gaps Review findings from two orthogonal passes, all fixed inline. GUARD (correctness, from the standards pass): the guard omitted `milestoneUnbounded`, which is the established trust authority for these very counters in this same function — it nulls progressPercent at :2286 and gates the prose fallback at :2294. An unbounded milestone yields a conflated/understated total, so `completedPhases < totalPhases` could be an artifact of a bad denominator and demote a genuinely-complete milestone. Now gated. TESTS: - Prose/guard parity assertion. The guard regex-matches prose emitted from a DIFFERENT file; if that prose drifts the guard silently stops firing and the bug returns undetected. Per the repo's generative-fix-divergence rule, a test now asserts the emitted body Status still matches the guard's pattern — asserting the emitted value against the pattern rather than duplicating the string. - limit+1: completedPhases > totalPhases must NOT fire; inconsistent counters fall through rather than guessing. - Untrustworthy counters (no phases dir → totalPhases null) must NOT fire. - AC4: MCP invoke-command dispatch parity via handleMessage, the criterion both reviewers independently flagged as asserted-but-untested. - Hand-rolled STATE.md writes routed through the existing writeState fixture helper. The adversarial pass independently verified, by reading rather than trusting the diff's own comments, that: paused/stopped short-circuit before 'completed' so a paused milestone can never be clobbered; only cmdStateCompletePhase emits the targeted prose, so no sibling caller over-fires; the counters come from a fresh disk scan independent of this write, so there is no pre/post off-by-one; and the #1255 pinning fixture creates no phases dir, leaving completedPhases null and the guard inert — so that test is provably unaffected rather than assumed to be. * chore(3578): add changeset fragment * chore(3578): backfill changeset PR number (#3614) --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
GSD Core
Git. Ship. Done.
English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
What is GSD Core
GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.
How it works
Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:
- Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
- Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
- Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
- Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
- Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one
Quickstart
npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.
On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.
Once installed, start a new project or onboard an existing repo:
/gsd-new-project # greenfield project
/gsd-onboard # existing codebase
New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase, or Onboarding an existing codebase for brownfield setup.
Documentation
What's new in 1.7.0 → docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md
Tutorials — learning by doing:
How-to guides — task-focused recipes:
Reference — authoritative facts:
Explanation — concepts and design decisions:
Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.
Why it works
Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.
Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.
Community
| Project | Platform |
|---|---|
| gsd-opencode | Original OpenCode port |
| Discord | Community support |
Star History
License
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.