Files
msd-core/.changeset
Behruz Nassre Esfahani c26947808a feat(#1269): expand same-prefix numeric ID ranges in --phase-req-ids (#1419)
* feat(#1269): expand same-prefix numeric ID ranges in --phase-req-ids

normalizePhaseReqIds treated a range token like "SEL-01..SEL-03" as a single
literal ID, so gap-analysis reported the range string as a missing requirement
even when SEL-01/02/03 existed individually.

Add a per-token range expander (run AFTER the existing split, preserving the
string[] | null | undefined contract): a token matching <PREFIX>-<NN>..<PREFIX>-<MM>
with identical prefixes, ascending bounds, and EQUAL digit width expands to the
individual IDs preserving that width; anything ambiguous stays literal
(fail-closed). Differing-width bounds stay literal so the expander never invents
a zero-padding the author didn't type, and ranges beyond MAX_PHASE_REQ_RANGE
(1000) stay literal as a DoS guard.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#1269): add changeset for --phase-req-ids range expansion

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#1269): mark changeset docs-exempt (internal flag, no user docs surface)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#1269): isolate the DoS-cap branch with a same-width range; doc nits

Review fixes: the AC4 DoS test used REQ-1..REQ-100000, whose differing digit
widths trip the width guard before the cap is reached. Use a same-width
REQ-0001..REQ-1001 (span 1001 > 1000) so the test actually exercises the cap.
Clarify the PHASE_REQ_RANGE_RE capture-group JSDoc and the property-test width
assertion comment.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>
2026-06-18 21:59:10 -04:00
..

Changeset Fragments

This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.

Why

Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.

See #2975 for the full rationale.

Adding a fragment

node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
  --type Fixed \
  --pr 1234 \
  --body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"

This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.

Format

---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.

Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.

Opting out

PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.

At release time

Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:

node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty

This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.

Archived fragments

.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.