c6ce4d1d9a
* test(#2755): failing-first coverage for per-runtime kimi hooks root Install/uninstall filesystem-shape rows over a sandbox HOME (no permission tricks) plus resolver unit rows. Covers both uninstall directions, which is where a fix applied only to the install call site would drift. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2755): resolve the kimi hooks-TOML root per runtime resolveKimiHooksTomlDir took no runtime argument and hardcoded ~/.kimi, but both kimi and kimi-code route through the single hooksSurface=kimi-hooks-toml branch. A --kimi-code install therefore wrote its [[hooks]] block, hook bundle and CommonJS marker into Kimi CLI's config file, and a --kimi-code uninstall stripped Kimi CLI's block. Adds a runtime selector to the resolver -- kimi keeps ~/.kimi + KIMI_SHARE_DIR, kimi-code gets ~/.kimi-code + KIMI_CODE_HOME, per Kimi Code's own upstream data-locations and hooks docs -- and passes the runtime at both the install and uninstall call sites. An omitted or unrecognized runtime still resolves ~/.kimi, so the exported no-arg contract is unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#2755): use centralized helpers and add a divergence guard Review findings, all fixed in-PR: - The new test block reimplemented runMinimalInstall, createTempDir and toPosixPath. Extends runMinimalInstall with optional root/extraEnv instead (back-compat: every existing caller passes neither) and uses the centralized helpers, per CONTRIBUTING's Use Centralized Test Helpers rule. - Adds a parity assertion between the capability registry and the resolver: a third runtime declaring hooksSurface kimi-hooks-toml would silently inherit ~/.kimi, re-creating this very defect. The guard fires the moment those two surfaces drift. - Adds an installer-level test proving KIMI_SHARE_DIR and KIMI_CODE_HOME do not interfere when both are set, which only the resolver unit covered before. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#2755): track the kimi-code hooks root in the emitted-artifact gates The remote runner caught a real ripple: moving kimi-code hooks to ~/.kimi-code made 31 emitted paths unattributable and 58 emitted hashes unexplained, because three parallel surfaces keyed on the literal .kimi path. - HOOK_CONFIG_RELATIVE_PATHS excluded only .kimi/config.toml, so kimi-code's config.toml became manifest-visible; it embeds a platform-varying node-runner command and must stay out for both products. - HOOKS_ROOTS, the package.json-marker branch and the synthesized-install-metadata pattern each named .kimi only. - tests/fixtures/install-tree/kimi-code.json still recorded the old paths; regenerated via gen:install-tree. Adds the per-PR drift acknowledgment for the 58 paths whose bytes are unchanged but whose destination moved - a ripple no source diff can show, since no hook script was edited. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2755): clear production-tree security advisories The remote runner's npm-integrity gate reported 2 high advisories in the production dependency tree. My diff touches neither package.json nor package-lock.json, so these come from the base -- but a red gate is not something to wave off as pre-existing, so it is fixed here rather than deferred. Lockfile-only, semver-in-range, via npm audit fix: fast-uri 3.1.4 -> 3.1.5 (host confusion via backslash authority introducer) ip-address 10.2.0 -> 10.4.0 (three SSRF / trust-boundary bypasses) hono 4.12.31 -> 4.13.0 (moderate; reverting it traded a high for a moderate, so the full remedy is taken) npm audit now reports 0 vulnerabilities at every severity, npm ci installs clean from the updated lockfile, and the build and the kimi behavior both re-verified afterwards. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2755): backfill changeset pr numbers Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GSD Core
Git. Ship. Done.
English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
What is GSD Core
GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.
How it works
Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:
- Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
- Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
- Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
- Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
- Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one
Quickstart
npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.
On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.
Once installed, start a new project or onboard an existing repo:
/gsd-new-project # greenfield project
/gsd-onboard # existing codebase
New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase, or Onboarding an existing codebase for brownfield setup.
Documentation
What's new in 1.7.0 → docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md
Tutorials — learning by doing:
How-to guides — task-focused recipes:
Reference — authoritative facts:
Explanation — concepts and design decisions:
Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.
Why it works
Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.
Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.
Community
| Project | Platform |
|---|---|
| gsd-opencode | Original OpenCode port |
| Discord | Community support |
Star History
License
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.