Files
msd-core/get-shit-done/workflows/eval-review.md
Fana 33575ba91d feat: /gsd-ai-integration-phase + /gsd-eval-review — AI framework selection and eval coverage layer (#1971)
* feat: /gsd:ai-phase + /gsd:eval-review — AI evals and framework selection layer

Adds a structured AI development layer to GSD with 5 new agents, 2 new
commands, 2 new workflows, 2 reference files, and 1 template.

Commands:
- /gsd:ai-phase [N] — pre-planning AI design contract (inserts between
  discuss-phase and plan-phase). Orchestrates 4 agents in sequence:
  framework-selector → ai-researcher → domain-researcher → eval-planner.
  Output: AI-SPEC.md with framework decision, implementation guidance,
  domain expert context, and evaluation strategy.
- /gsd:eval-review [N] — retroactive eval coverage audit. Scores each
  planned eval dimension as COVERED/PARTIAL/MISSING. Output: EVAL-REVIEW.md
  with 0-100 score, verdict, and remediation plan.

Agents:
- gsd-framework-selector: interactive decision matrix (6 questions) →
  scored framework recommendation for CrewAI, LlamaIndex, LangChain,
  LangGraph, OpenAI Agents SDK, Claude Agent SDK, AutoGen/AG2, Haystack
- gsd-ai-researcher: fetches official framework docs + writes AI systems
  best practices (Pydantic structured outputs, async-first, prompt
  discipline, context window management, cost/latency budget)
- gsd-domain-researcher: researches business domain and use-case context —
  surfaces domain expert evaluation criteria, industry failure modes,
  regulatory constraints, and practitioner rubric ingredients before
  eval-planner writes measurable criteria
- gsd-eval-planner: designs evaluation strategy grounded in domain context;
  defaults to Arize Phoenix (tracing) + RAGAS (RAG eval) with detect-first
  guard for existing tooling
- gsd-eval-auditor: retroactive codebase scan → scores eval coverage

Integration points:
- plan-phase: non-blocking nudge (step 4.5) when AI keywords detected and
  no AI-SPEC.md present
- settings: new workflow.ai_phase toggle (default on)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: refine ai-integration-phase layer — rename, house style, consistency fixes

Amends the ai-evals framework layer (df8cb6c) with post-review improvements
before opening upstream PR.

Rename /gsd:ai-phase → /gsd:ai-integration-phase:
- Renamed commands/gsd/ai-phase.md → ai-integration-phase.md
- Renamed get-shit-done/workflows/ai-phase.md → ai-integration-phase.md
- Updated config key: workflow.ai_phase → workflow.ai_integration_phase
- Updated repair action: addAiPhaseKey → addAiIntegrationPhaseKey
- Updated all 84 cross-references across agents, workflows, templates, tests

Consistency fixes (same class as PR #1380 review):
- commands/gsd: objective described 3-agent chain, missing gsd-domain-researcher
- workflows/ai-integration-phase: purpose tag described 3-agent chain + "locks
  three things" — updated to 4 agents + 4 outputs
- workflows/ai-integration-phase: missing DOMAIN_MODEL resolve-model call in
  step 1 (domain-researcher was spawned in step 7.5 with no model variable)
- workflows/ai-integration-phase: fractional step ## 7.5 renumbered to integers
  (steps 8–12 shifted)

Agent house style (GSD meta-prompting conformance):
- All 5 new agents refactored to execution_flow + step name="" structure
- Role blocks compressed to 2 lines (removed verbose "Core responsibilities")
- Added skills: frontmatter to all 5 agents (agent-frontmatter tests)
- Added # hooks: commented pattern to file-writing agents
- Added ALWAYS use Write tool anti-heredoc instruction to file-writing agents
- Line reductions: ai-researcher −41%, domain-researcher −25%, eval-planner −26%,
  eval-auditor −25%, framework-selector −9%

Test coverage (tests/ai-evals.test.cjs — 48 tests):
- CONFIG: workflow.ai_integration_phase defaults and config-set/get
- HEALTH: W010 warning emission and addAiIntegrationPhaseKey repair
- TEMPLATE: AI-SPEC.md section completeness (10 sections)
- COMMAND: ai-integration-phase + eval-review frontmatter validity
- AGENTS: all 5 new agent files exist
- REFERENCES: ai-evals.md + ai-frameworks.md exist and are non-empty
- WORKFLOW: plan-phase nudge integration, workflow files exist + agent coverage

603/603 tests passing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add Google ADK to framework selector and reference matrix

Google ADK (released March 2025) was missing from the framework options.
Adds Python + Java multi-agent framework optimised for Gemini / Vertex AI.

- get-shit-done/references/ai-frameworks.md: add Google ADK profile (type,
  language, model support, best for, avoid if, strengths, weaknesses, eval
  concerns); update Quick Picks, By System Type, and By Model Commitment tables
- agents/gsd-framework-selector.md: add "Google (Gemini)" to model provider
  interview question
- agents/gsd-ai-researcher.md: add Google ADK docs URL to documentation_sources

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: adapt to upstream conventions post-rebase

- Remove skills: frontmatter from all 5 new agents (upstream changed
  convention — skills: breaks Gemini CLI and must not be present)
- Add workflow.ai_integration_phase to VALID_CONFIG_KEYS whitelist in
  config.cjs (config-set blocked unknown keys)
- Add ai_integration_phase: true to CONFIG_DEFAULTS in core.cjs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: rephrase 4b.1 line to avoid false-positive in prompt-injection scan

"contract as a Pydantic model" matched the `act as a` pattern case-insensitively.
Rephrased to "output schema using a Pydantic model".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: adapt to upstream conventions (W016, colon refs, config docs)

- Replace verify.cjs from upstream to restore W010-W015 + cmdValidateAgents,
  lost when rebase conflict was resolved with --theirs
- Add W016 (workflow.ai_integration_phase absent) inside the config try block,
  avoids collision with upstream's W010 agent-installation check
- Add addAiIntegrationPhaseKey repair case mirroring addNyquistKey pattern
- Replace /gsd: colon format with /gsd- hyphen format across all new files
  (agents, workflows, templates, verify.cjs) per stale-colon-refs guard (#1748)
- Add workflow.ai_integration_phase to planning-config.md reference table
- Add ai_integration_phase → workflow.ai_integration_phase to NAMESPACE_MAP
  in config-field-docs.test.cjs so CONFIG_DEFAULTS coverage check passes
- Update ai-evals tests to use W016 instead of W010

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: add 5 new agents to E2E Copilot install expected list

gsd-ai-researcher, gsd-domain-researcher, gsd-eval-auditor,
gsd-eval-planner, gsd-framework-selector added to the hardcoded
expected agent list in copilot-install.test.cjs (#1890).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-10 10:49:00 -04:00

154 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown

<purpose>
Retroactive audit of an implemented AI phase's evaluation coverage. Standalone command that works on any GSD-managed AI phase. Produces a scored EVAL-REVIEW.md with gap analysis and remediation plan.
Use after /gsd-execute-phase to verify that the evaluation strategy from AI-SPEC.md was actually implemented. Mirrors the pattern of /gsd-ui-review and /gsd-validate-phase.
</purpose>
<required_reading>
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/ai-evals.md
</required_reading>
<process>
## 0. Initialize
```bash
INIT=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" init phase-op "${PHASE_ARG}")
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
```
Parse: `phase_dir`, `phase_number`, `phase_name`, `phase_slug`, `padded_phase`, `commit_docs`.
```bash
AUDITOR_MODEL=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" resolve-model gsd-eval-auditor --raw)
```
Display banner:
```
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
GSD ► EVAL AUDIT — PHASE {N}: {name}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
```
## 1. Detect Input State
```bash
SUMMARY_FILES=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null)
AI_SPEC_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-AI-SPEC.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
EVAL_REVIEW_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-EVAL-REVIEW.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
```
**State A** — AI-SPEC.md + SUMMARY.md exist: Full audit against spec
**State B** — SUMMARY.md exists, no AI-SPEC.md: Audit against general best practices
**State C** — No SUMMARY.md: Exit — "Phase {N} not executed. Run /gsd-execute-phase {N} first."
**If `EVAL_REVIEW_FILE` non-empty:** Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Existing Eval Review"
- question: "EVAL-REVIEW.md already exists for Phase {N}."
- options:
- "Re-audit — run fresh audit"
- "View — display current review and exit"
If "View": display file, exit.
If "Re-audit": continue.
**If State B (no AI-SPEC.md):** Warn:
```
No AI-SPEC.md found for Phase {N}.
Audit will evaluate against general AI eval best practices rather than a phase-specific plan.
Consider running /gsd-ai-integration-phase {N} before implementation next time.
```
Continue (non-blocking).
## 2. Gather Context Paths
Build file list for auditor:
- AI-SPEC.md (if exists — the planned eval strategy)
- All SUMMARY.md files in phase dir
- All PLAN.md files in phase dir
## 3. Spawn gsd-eval-auditor
```
◆ Spawning eval auditor...
```
Build prompt:
```markdown
Read ~/.claude/agents/gsd-eval-auditor.md for instructions.
<objective>
Conduct evaluation coverage audit of Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
{If AI-SPEC exists: "Audit against AI-SPEC.md evaluation plan."}
{If no AI-SPEC: "Audit against general AI eval best practices."}
</objective>
<files_to_read>
- {summary_paths}
- {plan_paths}
- {ai_spec_path if exists}
</files_to_read>
<input>
ai_spec_path: {ai_spec_path or "none"}
phase_dir: {phase_dir}
phase_number: {phase_number}
phase_name: {phase_name}
padded_phase: {padded_phase}
state: {A or B}
</input>
```
Spawn as Task with model `AUDITOR_MODEL`.
## 4. Parse Auditor Result
Read the written EVAL-REVIEW.md. Extract:
- `overall_score`
- `verdict` (PRODUCTION READY | NEEDS WORK | SIGNIFICANT GAPS | NOT IMPLEMENTED)
- `critical_gap_count`
## 5. Display Summary
```
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
GSD ► EVAL AUDIT COMPLETE — PHASE {N}: {name}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
◆ Score: {overall_score}/100
◆ Verdict: {verdict}
◆ Critical Gaps: {critical_gap_count}
◆ Output: {eval_review_path}
{If PRODUCTION READY:}
Next step: /gsd-plan-phase (next phase) or deploy
{If NEEDS WORK:}
Address critical gaps in EVAL-REVIEW.md, then re-run /gsd-eval-review {N}
{If SIGNIFICANT GAPS or NOT IMPLEMENTED:}
Review AI-SPEC.md evaluation plan. Critical eval dimensions are not implemented.
Do not deploy until gaps are addressed.
```
## 6. Commit
**If `commit_docs` is true:**
```bash
git add "${EVAL_REVIEW_FILE}"
git commit -m "docs({phase_slug}): add EVAL-REVIEW.md — score {overall_score}/100 ({verdict})"
```
</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Phase execution state detected correctly
- [ ] AI-SPEC.md presence handled (with or without)
- [ ] gsd-eval-auditor spawned with correct context
- [ ] EVAL-REVIEW.md written (by auditor)
- [ ] Score and verdict displayed to user
- [ ] Appropriate next steps surfaced based on verdict
- [ ] Committed if commit_docs enabled
</success_criteria>