Batch 17 of 17 — the terminal batch — in the ad hoc timeout literal migration (epic #4445). Replaces every bare numeric timeout/timeoutMs object-literal property in tests/cjs-command-router-adapter.test.cjs, tests/dispatcher.test.cjs, tests/run-tests-temp-root.test.cjs, and tests/shell-command-projection-dispatch.test.cjs with a named constant, per eslint-rules/no-adhoc-timeout-literal.cjs. No src/bin file touched, no numeric value changed anywhere. Eslint ground truth (9 sites) matches the issue's own stated count exactly for the first time in this epic — no drift to disclose. Reuses PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS (1 site) and QUICK_SPAWN_TIMEOUT_MS (1 site). Adds four file-local constants for shapes with no existing match: RUN_TESTS_ISOLATED_PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS and RUN_TESTS_HARNESS_SPAWN_TIMEOUT_MS (run-tests-temp-root.test.cjs, distinguishing a `node -e` isolated function call from a real end-to-end spawn of the test runner itself, despite each coinciding numerically with an unrelated existing constant), and EXEC_TOOL_OPTION_PASSTHROUGH_TIMEOUT_MS and DISPATCH_FORCED_TIMEOUT_MS (shell-command-projection-dispatch.test.cjs — a mocked-spawnSync pass-through fixture and a deliberately-forced real timeout, neither a real subprocess bound in the usual sense). Terminal-batch cleanup: deletes eslint-rules/no-adhoc-timeout-literal.allowlist.json entirely, drops its require and the allowlist option from eslint.config.mjs's local/no-adhoc-timeout-literal registration (now a bare 'error', mirroring local/no-unbounded-spawn's own already-terminal configuration in the same file), and updates TESTING-STANDARDS.md's enforcement note to match — a stale pointer to the deleted file caught by review, fixed inline. A full-repo eslint run with no cache confirms zero violations anywhere in the tree under the now allowlist-free rule. Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GSD Core
Git. Ship. Done.
English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.
What is GSD Core
GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.
How it works
Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:
- Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
- Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
- Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
- Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
- Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one
Quickstart
npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.
On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.
Once installed, start a new project or onboard an existing repo:
/gsd-new-project # greenfield project
/gsd-onboard # existing codebase
New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase, or Onboarding an existing codebase for brownfield setup.
Documentation
What's new in 1.7.0 → docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md
Tutorials — learning by doing:
How-to guides — task-focused recipes:
Reference — authoritative facts:
Explanation — concepts and design decisions:
Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.
Why it works
Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.
Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.
Community
| Project | Platform |
|---|---|
| gsd-opencode | Original OpenCode port |
| Discord | Community support |
Star History
License
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.