Tom Boucher cf2e66b39e feat(#1708): typed documentation-sourced #853 dispatch-flatten (ADR-1239 Phase B) (#1719)
* feat(#1708): typed documentation-sourced #853 dispatch-flatten

Graduate the #853 orchestrator-backgrounding decision from a scattered RUNTIME==='codex' prose check to a typed, documentation-sourced engine decision. Adds a backgroundDispatch dispatch sub-axis (sourced per host: codex+cursor documented true, 9 documented false, 5 undocumented), shouldFlattenDispatch(dispatch) (inline UNLESS background && backgroundDispatch, fail-closed), and a gsd_run query dispatch-should-flatten the plan/execute workflows call. Cursor is newly background-eligible per its docs (inline->background) — a documentation-justified behavior change. No RUNTIME-name residue for this decision.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#1708): backgroundDispatch citations in matrix + CONTEXT note

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#1708): address review findings on typed dispatch-flatten

Code/adversarial review: convert the manager.md/autonomous.md Compound Action preamble from hardcoded 'On Codex' to FLATTEN-based branching (the handlers already use the query; the preamble contradicted them and was wrong for cursor); make shouldFlattenDispatch null-safe + type-honest (accepts raw 'undocumented' registry values); make backgroundDispatch a required descriptor field (matching its siblings, all 16 carry it); strengthen the config.runtime behavioral test; update the bug-853 prose-pin test + comment. Security review clean; Codex confirmed no fail-open.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#1708): backfill backgroundDispatch in role:runtime test fixtures

Making backgroundDispatch a required descriptor field broke role:runtime fixtures in capability-manifest-version/capability-registry/host-integration-descriptors tests that build a dispatch object without it (caught by full gsd-test, not scoped npm test). Backfill backgroundDispatch:false into the well-formed fixtures; the deliberately-malformed 'required-field' test fixture is left malformed by design.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#1708): update fix-1521 dispatch-gating assertion to the FLATTEN gate

fix-1521 pinned the codex-specific run_in_background prose that #1708 graduated to the typed dispatch-should-flatten/FLATTEN gate. Update its assertions to verify FLATTEN=false gating (not a runtime name) + that the old RUNTIME===codex gate is gone. Caught by full gsd-test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#1708): add changeset for typed dispatch-flatten

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#1708): remove stray temp PR-body file

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#1708): add issue ref to bug-853 allow-test-rule annotations

ADR-456 requires every allow-test-rule exemption to carry a see #NNN reference; the source-text-is-the-product annotations added when migrating the prose assertions lacked it (lint-tests CI gate). Add (see #1708).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-25 15:37:33 -04:00

GSD Core

Git. Ship. Done.

English · Português · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어

A light-weight meta-prompting, context engineering, and spec-driven development system for Claude Code, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more.

npm version npm downloads Tests Discord GitHub stars License


What is GSD Core

GSD Core is a context-engineering and spec-driven development framework that drives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Kimi CLI, Copilot, Cursor, and more) through a disciplined phase loop. It solves context rot — the quality degradation that accumulates as an AI fills its context window — by running all heavy research, planning, and execution work in fresh-context subagents while keeping your main session lean.


How it works

Each milestone repeats the same five-step loop, one phase at a time:

  1. Discuss — capture implementation decisions before anything is planned
  2. Plan — research, decompose, and verify the plan fits a fresh context window
  3. Execute — run plans in parallel waves; each executor starts with a clean 200k-token context
  4. Verify — walk through what was built; diagnose and fix before declaring done
  5. Ship — create the PR, archive the phase, repeat for the next one

Quickstart

npx @opengsd/gsd-core@latest

The installer prompts for your runtime (Claude Code, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and more) and whether to install globally or locally. The installer is required for cross-runtime compatibility — do not copy files from agents/ or commands/ directly.

On another runtime or without Node.js? See Install on your runtime.

Once installed, start your first project:

/gsd-new-project

New here? Follow Your first project for a guided walkthrough from install to first shipped phase.


Documentation

Tutorials — learning by doing:

How-to guides — task-focused recipes:

Reference — authoritative facts:

Explanation — concepts and design decisions:

Full index: docs/README.md. Other languages: 日本語 · 한국어 · Português · 简体中文.


Why it works

Most AI-coding setups fail at scale because context bloat silently degrades output quality, there is no shared memory between sessions, and nothing verifies that code actually works. GSD Core solves all three: heavy work runs in fresh subagents, structured artifacts like STATE.md and CONTEXT.md survive session boundaries, and the verify step walks through what was built and generates fix plans before a phase is declared done. See docs/explanation/context-engineering.md for the full reasoning.

Troubleshooting? See docs/how-to/recover-and-troubleshoot.md.


Community

Project Platform
gsd-opencode Original OpenCode port
Discord Community support

Star History

Star History Chart

License

MIT License. See LICENSE for details.


Claude Code is powerful. GSD Core makes it reliable.

Description
No description provided
Readme MIT 77 MiB
Languages
JavaScript 82.3%
TypeScript 17.4%
Shell 0.3%