* test(#2847): add failing-first regression tests for gap-closure frontmatter schema gap --gaps did not load a machine-checked requirement for gap_closure: true. The planner's only validation gate (frontmatter.validate --schema plan) never required it, and plan-phase.md's downstream_consumer contract never mentioned it either, so gap-closure plans could pass validation while missing the field that /gsd:execute-phase --gaps-only filters on. These tests are RED against current production code: no plan-gap-closure schema exists yet, and neither agents/gsd-planner.md's validate_plan step nor plan-phase.md's downstream_consumer block references gap_closure conditionally. * fix(#2847): enforce gap_closure via plan-gap-closure schema --gaps did not load a machine-checked requirement for gap_closure: true. The planner's only validation gate (frontmatter.validate --schema plan) never required it, so a gap-closure plan could pass validation while missing the field /gsd:execute-phase --gaps-only filters on, silently spawning zero executors. Add a plan-gap-closure schema (every plan-required field plus gap_closure) and make the planner's validate_plan step select it when gap_closure mode is active, plan otherwise. Standard/reviews-mode plans are unaffected: plan's required fields are unchanged. plan-phase.md's downstream_consumer block was investigated for a symmetric mention but deliberately left untouched: it sits 36 bytes under the frozen ADR-857 PRE_PHASE6 ceiling and the validate_plan step in gsd-planner.md is the actual call site, needing no help from plan-phase.md's prose. * fix(#2847): compact validate_plan edit under gsd-planner.md size caps Merging origin/next (7 commits, including #2775's gsd-planner.md STRIDE-row edit) left only 22 chars of headroom under four separate hard-coded 49152-char caps on gsd-planner.md (planner-decomposition, precondition-element, reversibility-tagging, security.test.cjs). The verbose validate_plan prose from the previous commit overran all four. Compact the edit to a single line (net +17 chars vs origin/next) while keeping the functional content: schema name, mode condition, and the unchanged base required-fields list. Also: - Fix a real bug in the fix-2847 negative-assertion test: plan-phase.md mentions the literal string "<downstream_consumer>" twice in backtick-quoted prose before the actual opening tag, so a plain indexOf() grabbed the wrong start position and swallowed ~10KB of unrelated content (including a "gap_closure" hit in a Mode: enum line), producing a false failure. Anchor on the tag starting its own line instead. - Merge the emitted-drift-ack fragment for gsd-planner.md with the #2775 fragment brought in by the merge (both named the same path; two ack sources may never name the same path) and correct its byte delta to the actual final number. * fix(#2847): drop stale merge-inherited emitted-drift-ack fragments Merging origin/next brought in three new emitted-drift-ack fragments (1700, 2658, 2775) relative to this branch's fork point. #2775 collided with my own gsd-planner.md key and was already consolidated. #1700 and #2658 don't collide, but none of their entries name a path this branch's actual diff touches (git diff --name-only origin/next...HEAD) — the ripples they explain are already baked into the current next baseline, so they explain nothing here and the emitted-attribution gate correctly reports them as stale (verified live: spike-wrap-up.md from #1700). Delete both fragment files. Neither is referenced by any test beyond a stray comment pointing at an unrelated diagnosis artifact path, not the ack fragment itself. * fix(#2847): restore merge-inherited ack fragments deleted in error 1700-spike-manifest-idea-scoping.json and 2658-trae-instruction-file-path.json exist on origin/next (landed via other, already-merged PRs) and arrived on this branch unchanged via the origin/next merge. The previous commit deleted them to satisfy a stale-acknowledgment finding, but the finding was about the acks being MODIFIED in this diff, not about needing to stop existing — deleting them would have silently reverted two other PRs' already-merged, already-justified byte growth. Restored byte-identical to origin/next (git diff origin/next -- <path> empty for both). 2775-planner-package-legitimacy-gate.json stays consolidated into 2847-gap-closure-validate-plan-step.json: that one was a genuine hard key-collision (two fragments naming the same gsd-planner.md path, which lint-emitted-drift-ack hard-blocks), not a pass-through case. * fix(#2847): bind --schema to gap_closure mode, not hardcode it Prior revision left the validate_plan bash invocation unconditional (--schema plan)) while only the prose sentence above it described the gap_closure-mode branch. An agent executing the shown line literally always validated with the plan schema, so a gap-closure plan missing gap_closure: true still reported valid:true — #2847 reproducing unchanged. Existing tests didn't catch it: they checked for substring presence anywhere in the step, which the prose alone satisfied. Change the bash line to --schema "$SCHEMA" — a real shell-variable reference in the same placeholder convention this file already uses for "$PLAN_PATH" (never literally assigned; the agent resolves it from context, same as PLAN_PATH). A genuine if/then bash conditional already exists elsewhere in this file (load_project_state's INIT @file: check), confirming executed conditionals, not merely descriptive prose, are the established pattern here. Rewrite the regression test to assert on the bash block's literal --schema argument: reject a hardcoded plan) or plan-gap-closure) literal, require a variable reference, and require the step's prose to bind that same variable name. Verified RED against the prior revision and GREEN against this one before committing either state. * fix(#2847): CRLF-safe tests, drop unexplained ack, require gap_closure=true Four items from independent review, all landing together per request: 1. The #2847 regression test file had two CRLF-fragile regexes (local/no-crlf-fragile-split): a bare \n on readFileSync content means a real \r\n checkout returns invocationLine === null and all four executable-content assertions stop asserting anything while still reporting green. Both now use \r?\n. Prior lint report of exit 0 was a false green from a stale eslint cache. 2. The 2847 drift-ack fragment explained nothing: a direct edit to agents/gsd-planner.md is self-explaining, drift-acks exist for emitted-artifact ripple that cannot be traced to a changed source path. Deleted. Restored the 2775 fragment byte-identical to next (git diff --name-status next...HEAD -- tests/emitted-drift-acks/ now prints nothing) — it only conflicted with the now-deleted 2847 fragment, never needed touching itself. 3. plan-gap-closure validated gap_closure by PRESENCE only (unchanged since the original #2847 fix), so gap_closure: false satisfied it — --gaps-only filters strictly on gap_closure === true, so a false-valued plan still validates green and still spawns zero executors: #2847's exact reported symptom, one value away. Added an optional requiredValues map to FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS; plan-gap-closure now requires gap_closure to equal the string "true" (extractFrontmatter parses every scalar as a string) in addition to being present. Every other schema/field keeps the original presence-only contract. The row that had documented the hole instead of closing it now asserts the fix; a matching unit test locks requiredValues on FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS. 4. The "names the plain plan schema" assertion matched the bare substring "plan" anywhere in the step, which verify.plan-structure satisfies incidentally a few lines below — the assertion could not fail even if the plain-plan branch were deleted from the prose. Changed to match the standalone backtick-quoted plan token. * fix(#2847): remove contradictory leftover assertion in Row 6 test The gap_closure:false test asserted !present.includes('gap_closure') (correct — matches the implementation's fold-wrong-value-into-missing semantics) immediately followed by a stale, unedited leftover from an earlier draft of the same test asserting the opposite: present.includes('gap_closure'). The second could never pass once the first did; both were in the same diff. Verified before committing: searched every consumer of frontmatter.validate output (agents/gsd-planner.md, docs/CLI-TOOLS.md, all other test files) for any read of the present field — none exist. Nothing depends on "present" meaning "physically exists regardless of value correctness", so the implementation's fold (present/missing stay a full partition of required) is the right call; the test needed to agree with it, not the other way around. Manually replayed all six rows in the plan-gap-closure describe block against the built CLI to confirm each now passes. * fix(#2847): prototype-key guard, wrong-value diagnostic, doc fixes, vacuous tests Six items from an independent SHIP_VERDICT:no review, landing together per request: 1. Prototype-key crash (src/frontmatter.cts): FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS[schemaName] was an unguarded lookup, so --schema __proto__ (also constructor, toString, hasOwnProperty, valueOf) resolved to an Object.prototype member instead of undefined, the `!schema` check never fired, and the command crashed with an uncaught TypeError and a stack trace instead of "Unknown schema". Now reachable from prompt state (--schema is an agent-bound $SCHEMA), not just an unreachable literal. Guarded with Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call before the lookup, checked and rejected before assignment so `schema`'s type stays non-optional. Added a test for all five prototype keys. 2. Wrong-value diagnostic (src/frontmatter.cts, agents/gsd-planner.md): the strict gap_closure === "true" check from the previous fix was correct (fail-closed) but silent about WHY — a plan with gap_closure: True got "missing", indistinguishable from genuinely absent, even though the field is plainly in the file. Added an `invalidValue` field to the validate JSON (present but wrong-valued, disjoint from missing/present) and updated validate_plan's prose to state the exact required literal and explain invalidValue, within the remaining byte budget (49130/49152). 3. docs/reference/plan-md.md: fixed three inaccuracies in the gap_closure row — "this field plus every field above" implied `requirements` (documented Required: Yes) is schema-enforced, it is not; "Type: boolean" implied YAML True/TRUE/yes/1 are accepted, they are rejected (exact string match on literal lowercase true); "must never carry it" stated an unenforced rule as fact. Also switched /gsd:plan-phase and /gsd:execute-phase to the house-style hyphen form for docs/. 4. Vacuous negative assertions (tests/fix-2847-gap-closure-frontmatter.test.cjs): RegExp#test coerces a null invocationLine to the string "null", so both hardcoded-literal checks passed vacuously even if the step or its bash block were deleted entirely. Added a truthy precondition check first. 5. Deleted vacuous/pass-always tests: four in tests/frontmatter.unit.test.cjs strictly subsumed by (or, for the "superset" test, tautologically guaranteed by the same spread as) the deepEqual exact-list test; two describe blocks in the #2847 regression file that were already GREEN at the RED commit (5e5897cd2f17ebf2fc55757bae651bbbeb236289) and pinned untouched files rather than covering anything this change altered — one of them additionally forbade any future legitimate gap_closure mention in plan-phase.md, a trap for whoever frees up that file's byte budget later. 6. .changeset/clever-newts-wake.md: switched /gsd:plan-phase and /gsd:execute-phase to /gsd-plan-phase and /gsd-execute-phase — changesets render verbatim into CHANGELOG.md with no converter in the path, so the colon form would have reached readers naming a command no runtime registers. * chore(#2847): backfill changeset pr number (#3018) --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
330 lines
21 KiB
Markdown
330 lines
21 KiB
Markdown
# PLAN.md schema reference
|
||
|
||
A per-plan `PLAN.md` is GSD Core's executable unit of work — a structured document that tells an executor agent exactly what to build and how to verify it was built correctly. This page documents its structure. See [docs index](../README.md).
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Overview
|
||
|
||
Plans live inside phase directories at:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
.planning/phases/<NN>-<slug>/<NN>-<PP>-PLAN.md
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
For example: `.planning/phases/03-post-feed/03-02-PLAN.md` (Phase 3, Plan 2).
|
||
|
||
Plans are produced by the `gsd-planner` agent (spawned by `/gsd:plan-phase`) and consumed by `execute-phase`. A phase typically contains between one and four plans; plans within a phase are assigned to execution waves so that independent work runs in parallel.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## YAML frontmatter
|
||
|
||
Every PLAN.md opens with a YAML frontmatter block between `---` delimiters.
|
||
|
||
### Annotated example
|
||
|
||
```yaml
|
||
---
|
||
phase: 03-post-feed
|
||
plan: 02
|
||
type: execute
|
||
wave: 2
|
||
depends_on: ["03-01"]
|
||
files_modified:
|
||
- src/components/PostFeed.tsx
|
||
- src/components/PostCard.tsx
|
||
- src/app/feed/page.tsx
|
||
autonomous: true
|
||
requirements: ["FEED-01", "FEED-03"]
|
||
user_setup: []
|
||
|
||
must_haves:
|
||
truths:
|
||
- "User can scroll through posts from followed accounts"
|
||
- "Each post shows author avatar, name, timestamp, and content"
|
||
- "Empty state appears when no posts exist"
|
||
artifacts:
|
||
- path: "src/components/PostFeed.tsx"
|
||
provides: "Scrollable post list"
|
||
min_lines: 40
|
||
- path: "src/components/PostCard.tsx"
|
||
provides: "Individual post card"
|
||
exports: ["PostCard"]
|
||
key_links:
|
||
- from: "src/components/PostFeed.tsx"
|
||
to: "src/app/api/feed/route.ts"
|
||
via: "fetch in useEffect — calls /api/feed endpoint"
|
||
pattern: "fetch.*api/feed"
|
||
---
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Frontmatter field reference
|
||
|
||
| Field | Required | Type | Purpose |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| `phase` | Yes | string | Phase identifier, e.g. `03-post-feed`. |
|
||
| `plan` | Yes | string | Plan number within the phase, e.g. `02`. |
|
||
| `type` | Yes | `execute` or `tdd` | `execute` for standard plans; `tdd` for test-driven plans where tests are written before implementation. |
|
||
| `wave` | Yes | integer | Execution wave. Plans in wave 1 run in parallel (no dependencies). Plans in wave 2+ wait for all plans in the previous wave to complete. Pre-computed at plan time by `gsd-planner`. |
|
||
| `depends_on` | Yes | array of plan IDs | Plans this plan must wait for. Empty array = wave 1. Example: `["03-01"]` means this plan runs after Plan 01 in Phase 3. |
|
||
| `files_modified` | Yes | array of paths | Every file this plan creates or modifies. Used by the plan-checker to detect same-wave file conflicts and by execute-phase for merge tracking. |
|
||
| `autonomous` | Yes | boolean | `true` when all tasks are type `auto`. `false` when the plan contains any `checkpoint:*` task that requires human interaction. |
|
||
| `requirements` | Yes | array of IDs | Requirement IDs from ROADMAP.md that this plan addresses. Every phase requirement ID must appear in at least one plan's `requirements` field. Empty arrays are a BLOCKER. |
|
||
| `user_setup` | No | array of objects | External-service setup steps that Claude cannot automate (account creation, secret retrieval, dashboard configuration). When present, execute-phase generates a `USER-SETUP.md` checklist for the developer. |
|
||
| `status` | No | `superseded` | Marks a plan that was deliberately reassigned or abandoned mid-phase and will never be executed. A `status: superseded` plan is excluded from the phase's plan and summary counts, so it never holds the phase below 100%. See [Superseded plans](#superseded-plans). Any other value (or the field's absence) has no effect on counting. |
|
||
| `estimate` | No | object | Projected execution cost: `{tokens, raw_tokens, tasks, confidence}` (#2631, [ADR-2629](../adr/2629-phase-effort-estimation-calibration.md)). `tokens` is an `estimateTokens`-scale projection with the project's calibration factor **already applied** (which is why the plan-checker passes `--calibrated` to `estimate-check` — re-applying it would square the correction); `confidence` (`low`/`med`/`high`) is **derived from the calibration sample count, never self-rated**. Additive and optional — a plan without it behaves exactly as before. A plan estimated above `workflow.smart_zone_tokens` is flagged with a split recommendation at plan time; the flag is advisory and never blocks. |
|
||
| `must_haves` | Yes | object | Goal-backward verification criteria. See below. |
|
||
| `gap_closure` | Only in gap-closure mode | string, exact match | Must be exactly the literal lowercase `true` — validated as a string comparison, not a YAML boolean, so `True`, `TRUE`, `yes`, and `1` are all rejected. Required on every plan generated by `/gsd-plan-phase --gaps`, checked by the `plan-gap-closure` schema (`src/frontmatter.cts`) rather than `plan`. `/gsd-execute-phase --gaps-only` filters strictly on this field, so an omitted or wrong-valued `gap_closure` on a gap-closure plan means it is silently skipped — zero executors spawned, no error (#2847). Standard and reviews-mode plans validate against the unmodified `plan` schema, which neither requires nor checks this field (nothing rejects it as an extra field either, if present). |
|
||
|
||
### Superseded plans
|
||
|
||
A phase reads complete when every `*-PLAN.md` has a matching `*-SUMMARY.md`. When a plan is reassigned or dropped mid-phase — its work folded into a later plan — it will never gain a summary, and without a marker it would pin the phase below 100% forever (the plan-level analogue of a retired phase). Add `status: superseded` to that plan's frontmatter to exclude it from **both** the plan count (denominator) and the summary count (numerator):
|
||
|
||
```yaml
|
||
---
|
||
phase: 05-api
|
||
plan: "12"
|
||
type: execute
|
||
status: superseded
|
||
---
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
A phase with 13 plans, two of them `superseded`, then reads `11/11 → complete` — no fabricated summary required. The match is case-insensitive. Plans without the marker are counted exactly as before.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## `must_haves` field
|
||
|
||
`must_haves` captures what must be observably true for the phase goal to be achieved. It is derived during planning and verified after execution by the `gsd-verifier` agent.
|
||
|
||
### Sub-fields
|
||
|
||
| Sub-field | Type | Purpose |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| `truths` | array of strings | Observable behaviours from the user's perspective. Each must be verifiable. Example: `"User can send a message"`, not `"WebSocket library installed"`. |
|
||
| `artifacts` | array of objects | Files that must exist with substantive implementation (not stubs). |
|
||
| `artifacts[].path` | string | File path relative to project root. |
|
||
| `artifacts[].provides` | string | What capability this file delivers. |
|
||
| `artifacts[].min_lines` | integer (optional) | Minimum line count to be considered non-stub. |
|
||
| `artifacts[].exports` | array of strings (optional) | Expected named exports to verify. |
|
||
| `artifacts[].contains` | string (optional) | Regex or literal pattern that must appear in the file. |
|
||
| `key_links` | array of objects | Critical connections between artifacts — the wiring that makes the system work end-to-end. |
|
||
| `key_links[].from` | string | Source file (relative path from project root). Must be a literal file path — describe components or symbols in `via:`. |
|
||
| `key_links[].to` | string | Target file (relative path from project root). Must be a literal file path — describe endpoints, modules, or APIs in `via:`. |
|
||
| `key_links[].via` | string | Description of how they connect, including any endpoint, component, or symbol name (e.g. `fetch in useEffect — calls /api/feed`, `Prisma query via prisma.message`, `import`). |
|
||
| `key_links[].pattern` | string (optional) | Regex to verify the connection exists in source. |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Body structure
|
||
|
||
After frontmatter, the plan body uses named XML-style blocks read by the executor agent.
|
||
|
||
### `<objective>`
|
||
|
||
States what the plan delivers and why it matters for the project:
|
||
|
||
```xml
|
||
<objective>
|
||
Implement the post feed as a scrollable card list.
|
||
|
||
Purpose: Core display feature for the social feed phase.
|
||
Output: PostFeed and PostCard components wired to /api/feed.
|
||
</objective>
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### `<execution_context>`
|
||
|
||
Lists the workflow files associated with executing the plan. Always includes the execute-plan workflow; adds the checkpoints reference when the plan contains checkpoint tasks:
|
||
|
||
```xml
|
||
<execution_context>
|
||
@~/.claude/gsd-core/workflows/execute-plan.md
|
||
@~/.claude/gsd-core/templates/summary.md
|
||
</execution_context>
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
These `@` paths point at the local GSD install, not at repository files. The prefix shown here (`~/.claude/gsd-core/…`) is the Claude global-install location; other runtimes and local installs resolve to their own install directory — for example `.cursor/gsd-core/…`, or an absolute project path for a `--local` install. Because the prefix is install-relative, this block is not clone-portable: a committed plan carries whichever prefix the authoring install had. Execution does not depend on it — `/gsd-execute-phase` loads the execute-plan workflow from its own installed copy — so the block records the execution context rather than resolvable repository references. Contrast `<context>` (below), whose repository-relative `@` paths resolve after a `git clone`.
|
||
|
||
### `<context>`
|
||
|
||
References source files the executor needs to read. Includes project-level planning docs and any source files whose patterns or types the plan must replicate. Prior plan `SUMMARY.md` files are included only when there is a genuine dependency (imported types, shared decision) — not reflexively:
|
||
|
||
```xml
|
||
<context>
|
||
@.planning/PROJECT.md
|
||
@.planning/ROADMAP.md
|
||
@.planning/STATE.md
|
||
@src/components/UserCard.tsx
|
||
</context>
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### `<tasks>`
|
||
|
||
Contains one or more `<task>` elements. Every task element must carry `<name>`, `<files>`, `<read_first>`, `<action>`, `<verify>`, `<acceptance_criteria>`, and `<done>` for `type="auto"` and `type="tracer"` tasks. Optional `<precondition>` (see [Preconditions](#preconditions)) and `<reversibility>` (see [Reversibility](#reversibility)) elements may sit between `<name>` and `<files>`.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Preconditions
|
||
|
||
`<precondition>` is an **optional** element on `<task>` (issue #1949, *The Pragmatic Programmer* Topic 23 — Design by Contract). It states, in a single line of runnable/checkable prose, what must already be true for the task to begin safely. It closes the front-of-task side of the contract triad — preconditions (before) ↔ postconditions (`<verify>`/`<done>`/`<acceptance_criteria>`, after) ↔ invariants (`must_haves.truths`, across the whole plan).
|
||
|
||
```xml
|
||
<task type="auto">
|
||
<name>Add /reveal endpoint handler</name>
|
||
<precondition>server bootstraps and responds to GET /health (from the tracer slice)</precondition>
|
||
<files>server/reveal.ts</files>
|
||
<action>…</action>
|
||
<verify>curl /reveal?path=… opens the OS file manager</verify>
|
||
<done>Endpoint committed and manually verified</done>
|
||
</task>
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Optional and back-compat:** a plan that omits `<precondition>` on every task behaves exactly as today — the executor skips the check with no visible change. Adding `<precondition>` to a task tells the executor to assert it before any other task work (read-only checks only: file existence, env var presence, idempotent health pings; no side-effecting checks — halt and surface a checkpoint if one seems required) and halt (returning a `checkpoint:human-verify`, no partial commit) on an unmet precondition. Plans that include `<precondition>` pass `verify plan-structure` unchanged — the structural validator checks for the presence of required tags and does not reject unknown optional tags.
|
||
|
||
**Emission cases** (planner-side): emit `<precondition>` only when a task relies on state the plan's own `depends_on` ordering does not already guarantee. Three cases cover every legitimate use:
|
||
|
||
1. **External service setup** (`user_setup` frontmatter) — the consuming task ties a specific setup step to itself so the executor halts if the setup was skipped.
|
||
2. **Prior-phase artifact dependency** — a generated schema, a migration's dist output, a contract file from an earlier phase. Cross-phase `depends_on` does not cross phase boundaries, so `<precondition>` is the explicit pointer.
|
||
3. **Environment variable / runtime configuration** — a tool, API, or script the task invokes requires an env var or runtime config that exists *now*, not at plan time.
|
||
|
||
Full emission rules, anti-patterns ("the system is ready" is not checkable; do not use `<precondition>` for intra-plan sequencing — that is what `depends_on` is for), and the contract triad mapping: see `gsd-core/references/planner-preconditions.md`.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Reversibility
|
||
|
||
`<reversibility>` is an **optional** element on `<task>` (issue #1951, *The Pragmatic Programmer* Topic 15 — "Reversibility"). It records how costly the decision the task implements would be to undo, so a one-way-door choice gets a human beat before the agent walks through it. The `rating` attribute carries the classification; the body carries a one-line rationale.
|
||
|
||
```xml
|
||
<task type="auto">
|
||
<name>Define the on-disk event log format</name>
|
||
<reversibility rating="one-way">Phases 4-6 read this file; changing the
|
||
format after they land requires a migration for every existing project.</reversibility>
|
||
<files>src/event-log.cts</files>
|
||
<action>…</action>
|
||
<verify><automated>npm run test:unit -- event-log</automated></verify>
|
||
<done>Format documented and written by the writer under test</done>
|
||
</task>
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
| Rating | Meaning | Effect on the plan |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| `reversible` | Undo is local and cheap. | None. This is the default when no rating is given. |
|
||
| `costly` | Undo touches many call sites or needs a coordinated change. | Flagged in the plan so the reader sees the weight. Never blocks. |
|
||
| `one-way` | Undo requires a migration, breaks a published contract, or is impossible. | The planner inserts a `checkpoint:decision` immediately **before** the dependent task. |
|
||
|
||
**Optional and back-compat:** a plan that omits `<reversibility>` on every task behaves exactly as today — no flag, no checkpoint. Plans that include it pass `verify plan-structure` unchanged; the structural validator checks for the presence of required tags and does not reject unknown optional tags.
|
||
|
||
**Autonomy:** inserting a `checkpoint:decision` means the plan contains a checkpoint, so its frontmatter must set `autonomous: false`.
|
||
|
||
**Override:** `/gsd:plan-phase --no-reversibility-gates` (`REVERSIBILITY_GATES=false`) suppresses checkpoint insertion for intentionally-unattended runs. Ratings are still recorded and `costly` items are still flagged — the override changes what stops the run, not what the plan remembers.
|
||
|
||
Full taxonomy, emission rules, and anti-patterns (chiefly: rating everything `one-way` produces checkpoint fatigue; prefer *removing* irreversibility over gating it): see `gsd-core/references/planner-reversibility.md`.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Task types
|
||
|
||
| Type | Use | Autonomy |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| `auto` | Everything the executor can do independently. | Fully autonomous. |
|
||
| `tracer` | The leading thin end-to-end slice a plan starts with by default (tracer-first) — production-quality, wired through every layer, with a real end-to-end `<verify>`. | Fully autonomous; after committing, the executor runs the tracer's `<verify>` as an early integration gate — autonomous runs halt on failure before expansion, interactive runs present a `checkpoint:human-verify`. |
|
||
| `checkpoint:human-verify` | Visual or functional verification that requires a human to look at a running UI or service. | Pauses execution; presents to the developer; resumes on approval. |
|
||
| `checkpoint:decision` | Implementation choices that arose during execution and require the developer's input. | Pauses execution; presents options; resumes on selection. |
|
||
| `checkpoint:human-action` | Truly unavoidable manual steps (account creation, hardware interaction). Used sparingly. | Pauses execution; resumes on confirmation. |
|
||
|
||
Plans that contain any checkpoint task must set `autonomous: false` in frontmatter.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## `auto` task structure
|
||
|
||
```xml
|
||
<task type="auto">
|
||
<name>Task 1: Create PostCard component</name>
|
||
<files>src/components/PostCard.tsx</files>
|
||
<read_first>src/components/UserCard.tsx, src/types/post.ts</read_first>
|
||
<action>Create PostCard component accepting a Post prop (id, authorId, content, createdAt,
|
||
reactionCount). Render author avatar using UserAvatar from UserCard pattern. Show timestamp
|
||
using date-fns formatDistanceToNow. Export as named export PostCard.</action>
|
||
<verify>npx tsc --noEmit</verify>
|
||
<acceptance_criteria>
|
||
- src/components/PostCard.tsx exports named export PostCard
|
||
- PostCard.tsx contains "reactionCount" prop usage
|
||
- npx tsc --noEmit exits 0
|
||
</acceptance_criteria>
|
||
<done>PostCard renders post content with author and timestamp</done>
|
||
</task>
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Required fields for `auto` tasks
|
||
|
||
| Field | Rule |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| `<files>` | Every file the task creates or modifies. The executor writes only these files. |
|
||
| `<read_first>` | Files the executor must read before touching anything — the file being modified, any source-of-truth pattern file, any file whose types or conventions must be replicated. |
|
||
| `<action>` | Concrete instructions with exact identifiers, file paths, function signatures, and expected values. Never says "align X with Y" without specifying the target state. Never contains fenced code blocks or full implementations. |
|
||
| `<verify>` | A runnable command or check that proves the task succeeded. Must distinguish pass from fail — `echo "done"` is not valid. |
|
||
| `<acceptance_criteria>` | Verifiable conditions: grep-verifiable strings, command exit codes, observable behaviours. No subjective language ("looks correct", "properly configured"). Negative greps (`! grep -Eq 'PAT' file`) are file-scoped — region-scope them (`sed -n`/`awk` range, then grep) when a sibling task needs the construct elsewhere in the same file (#968). |
|
||
| `<done>` | A short measurable statement of the completed outcome. |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Plan quality dimensions
|
||
|
||
The `gsd-plan-checker` agent reviews every PLAN.md across 12 dimensions before execution begins. A plan that fails any BLOCKER-severity check is returned to `gsd-planner` for revision (up to 3 iterations):
|
||
|
||
| Dimension | What it checks |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| **1 — Requirement Coverage** | Every phase requirement ID from ROADMAP.md appears in at least one plan's `requirements` frontmatter field and has covering task(s). |
|
||
| **2 — Task Completeness** | Every `auto` task carries all required fields (`<files>`, `<action>`, `<verify>`, `<acceptance_criteria>`, `<done>`). No vague or empty fields. |
|
||
| **3 — Dependency Correctness** | `depends_on` references are valid, acyclic, and consistent with wave numbers. Wave N plan depends only on plans in waves < N. |
|
||
| **4 — Key Links Planned** | Artifacts in `must_haves.key_links` have corresponding tasks that implement the wiring — not just the artifact creation. |
|
||
| **5 — Scope Sanity** | Plans stay within context budget: 2–3 tasks per plan (4 = warning, 5+ = BLOCKER), ≤ 8–10 files per plan (15+ = BLOCKER). |
|
||
| **6 — Verification Derivation** | `must_haves.truths` are user-observable behaviours, not implementation details. Artifacts map to truths. Key links cover critical wiring. |
|
||
| **7 — Context Compliance** | Every `D-NN` decision from CONTEXT.md is addressed by at least one task. No task implements anything from `<deferred>`. |
|
||
| **7b — Scope Reduction Detection** | Task actions do not silently reduce a locked decision to a "v1", "stub", or "future enhancement" without delivering the full decision scope. Always a BLOCKER when found. |
|
||
| **7c — Architectural Tier Compliance** | Tasks assign capabilities to the correct tier per the RESEARCH.md Architectural Responsibility Map (when present). Security-sensitive capabilities in the wrong tier are BLOCKERs. |
|
||
| **8 — Nyquist Compliance** | When `workflow.nyquist_validation` is enabled and RESEARCH.md exists, every task has an `<automated>` verify command, no consecutive window of 3 tasks lacks coverage, and VALIDATION.md is present. |
|
||
| **9 — Cross-Plan Data Contracts** | When plans share data pipelines, their transformations are compatible — no plan strips data that another plan needs in original form. |
|
||
| **10 — CLAUDE.md Compliance** | Plans respect project-specific conventions, forbidden patterns, required tools, and security requirements from `./CLAUDE.md`. |
|
||
| **11 — Research Resolution** | When RESEARCH.md exists, its `## Open Questions` section is marked `(RESOLVED)` before planning proceeds. |
|
||
| **12 — Pattern Compliance** | When PATTERNS.md exists, tasks reference the correct analog patterns for each new or modified file. |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Wave execution model
|
||
|
||
Wave numbers are pre-computed during planning. Execute-phase groups plans by wave number and runs each wave's plans in parallel:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Wave 1: Plan 01, Plan 02, Plan 03 (all run simultaneously — no dependencies)
|
||
Wave 2: Plan 04 (waits for Wave 1 to complete)
|
||
Wave 3: Plan 05 (waits for Wave 2 to complete)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Plans within a wave that modify overlapping files must not be in the same wave — the plan-checker's Dimension 3 flags this as a BLOCKER.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Plan output
|
||
|
||
After a plan executes successfully, the executor writes a SUMMARY.md at:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
.planning/phases/<NN>-<slug>/<NN>-<PP>-SUMMARY.md
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The SUMMARY.md is the canonical record of what was built. Subsequent plans in the same phase may reference it when they have a genuine dependency on its types or decisions.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Related
|
||
|
||
- [CONTEXT.md schema](context-md.md)
|
||
- [Planning artifacts](planning-artifacts.md)
|
||
- [Features](../FEATURES.md)
|
||
- [docs index](../README.md)
|