Files
msd-core/tests
Tom Boucher e1d661ece0 feat(#3024): dynamic routing with failure-tier escalation (#3031)
* feat(#3024): dynamic routing with failure-tier escalation

Adds a `dynamic_routing` block to .planning/config.json that lets
the resolver start agents on a cheap tier and escalate one tier up
when the orchestrator detects a soft failure (verification
inconclusive, plan-check FLAG, etc.). Solves the "pay Opus rates as
insurance" anti-pattern by making escalation observed-quality-driven.

Architecture:
- AGENT_DEFAULT_TIERS map (light/standard/heavy) — every agent in
  MODEL_PROFILES declares a default tier; tests assert coverage
  so adding a new agent without updating the map fails CI.
- nextTier(currentTier) helper — light → standard → heavy → heavy
  (heavy stays at heavy; can't go further).
- resolveModelForTier(cwd, agentType, attempt) — new resolver. The
  orchestrator tracks the attempt counter and passes 0 for the
  first spawn, 1+ on escalation. The resolver caps internally at
  max_escalations so the orchestrator can blindly bump the counter.
- Schema validation: dynamic_routing.enabled / escalate_on_failure /
  max_escalations / tier_models.<light|standard|heavy>. Unknown
  tiers and unknown sub-keys rejected at config-set time.
- SDK schema mirror updated to keep CJS/SDK in lockstep (#2653).

Resolution precedence (highest → lowest):
  1. model_overrides[<agent>]              (full IDs accepted)
  2. dynamic_routing.tier_models[<tier>]   (NEW; escalation-aware)
  3. models[<phase_type>]                  (#3023 phase-type map)
  4. model_profile                         (per-agent column)
  5. Runtime default

Backward compatibility: dynamic_routing is disabled by default
(enabled: false or block omitted). resolveModelForTier short-
circuits to resolveModelInternal in that case, so callers can
adopt unconditionally without breaking existing behavior.

This PR delivers the JS-layer infrastructure: schema + tier map +
resolver. Orchestrator adoption (workflow markdown updates that
detect soft failures and call resolveModelForTier with attempt+1)
is incremental follow-up — verifier / plan-checker / integration-
checker each adopt the protocol when ready.

Tests (23 cases, all structural-IR — no stdout grep):
- Schema invariants: AGENT_DEFAULT_TIERS coverage, VALID_AGENT_TIERS
  exact match, every assignment uses a valid tier
- nextTier helper: light→standard→heavy→heavy, null on invalid input
- Disabled mode: no block + enabled:false both no-op (back-compat)
- Enabled mode: attempt=0 returns default tier model, attempt=1
  escalates, beyond max_escalations caps, heavy agents stay heavy,
  default max_escalations=1 when omitted
- Precedence: per-agent override beats dynamic_routing,
  dynamic_routing beats phase-type models
- Validation: every settings key accepted, unknown tiers/sub-keys
  rejected, bare `dynamic_routing` rejected as config-set target

Documentation:
- get-shit-done/references/model-profiles.md — full reference section
- docs/CONFIGURATION.md — full settings table + escalation flow
- docs/USER-GUIDE.md — task-oriented "Cheap-by-default" section
- docs/FEATURES.md — config row cross-link

Verification:
- 23/23 pass on regression test
- 6843/6843 full suite (23 net new from 6820)
- lint-no-source-grep clean (376 test files)
- SDK schema mirror keeps CJS/SDK in sync per #2653 parity test

Closes #3024

* fix(#3024): honor escalate_on_failure:false + 3 CR follow-ups

CodeRabbit on PR #3031 (4 findings — 1 Major + 2 Minor + 1 Nitpick):

1. **Major (inline)** — get-shit-done/bin/lib/core.cjs:1668
   resolveModelForTier ignored dynamic_routing.escalate_on_failure.
   When the user set it to false, escalation should be disabled, but
   the resolver only checked attempt/max_escalations. An orchestrator
   that always passes attempt+1 on retry would silently escalate
   despite the user opting out.
   Fix: gate effectiveAttempt on `dr.escalate_on_failure !== false`
   so false short-circuits every attempt back to the default tier.

2. **Minor (inline)** — docs/CONFIGURATION.md:123-126
   The dynamic_routing rows in the Core Settings table had 4 cells
   instead of 5 (missing the Options column), breaking the table
   structure. Added explicit Options values for enabled / escalate_on_failure
   / max_escalations rows.

3. **Minor (outside-diff)** — references/model-profiles.md:179-195
   "Resolution Logic" sketch was pre-#3024 and didn't include
   dynamic_routing in the precedence ladder. Updated to a 6-step
   block with dynamic_routing at step 3 (between override and
   phase-type).

4. **Nitpick** — tests/feat-3024-dynamic-routing.test.cjs:189+
   Tests used `if (lightAgent) { ... }` guards that silent-pass
   when AGENT_DEFAULT_TIERS drifts. Replaced all 5 conditional
   skips with `assert.ok(lightAgent, '...')` preconditions so a
   tier-mapping change surfaces as a test failure.

Plus: 2 new regression tests for the Major fix:
- escalate_on_failure:false caps every attempt at default tier
- escalate_on_failure:true (explicit) still escalates normally

Verification:
- 25/25 pass on regression test (23 prior + 2 escalate_on_failure)
- 6845/6845 full suite (2 net new)
- lint-no-source-grep clean

* docs(#3024): align precedence + add fence language tags (CR follow-up)

CodeRabbit (3 minor):

1. docs/CONFIGURATION.md:691 — "Per-Phase-Type Models → Resolution
   precedence" was a 4-step block written pre-#3024; readers got
   contradictory rules between the per-phase-type section and the
   later dynamic_routing section. Updated to the same 5-step ladder
   with dynamic_routing at step 2, and noted that dynamic_routing
   is disabled by default so this section's behavior is unchanged
   when the kill-switch is off.

2. docs/CONFIGURATION.md:770 — escalation-flow code fence missing
   language tag (MD040). Added `text`.

3. references/model-profiles.md:184 — resolution-ladder code fence
   missing language tag (MD040). Added `text`.

No code changes; docs only. Verification: regression test still 25/25.

* docs(#3024): clarify precedence prose — five layers, not four (CR nitpick)

CodeRabbit nitpick: the "Per-Phase-Type Models → Resolution
precedence" prose said "The four layers compose..." but the ladder
above lists five (including Runtime default). Also "dynamic_routing
escalates per-attempt above all of them" misreads as suggesting
dynamic_routing wins over model_overrides — actually overrides still
win at step 1.

Reworded top-down so the precedence direction is unambiguous:
  - model_profile = base
  - models = phase-level override
  - dynamic_routing = per-attempt escalation
  - model_overrides = per-agent exception (top)
  - runtime default = fallback

No code changes; docs only.

* docs(#3024): note escalate_on_failure:false in escalation-flow diagram (CR)

CodeRabbit nitpick: the escalation-flow diagram in
docs/CONFIGURATION.md described the soft-failure → respawn →
tier_models[next_tier_up] path, but didn't surface the
`dynamic_routing.escalate_on_failure: false` kill-switch right next
to it. Users reading the flow diagram (which is the canonical place
to understand attempt behavior) wouldn't see that the kill-switch
overrides the soft-failure branch.

Added a one-paragraph note immediately after the flow listing,
before the tier-sequence example, so the kill-switch is visible
exactly where users decide whether escalation will happen.

No code changes; docs only.
2026-05-02 14:26:35 -04:00
..