Files
msd-core/commands/gsd/research-phase.md
Lex Christopherson 2144960c6c feat: integrate research into plan-phase with specialized agents
Split gsd-researcher into two specialized agents:
- gsd-phase-researcher: tailored for phase research before planning
- gsd-project-researcher: tailored for ecosystem research before roadmap

Updated /gsd:plan-phase to auto-research before planning:
- Research runs if no RESEARCH.md exists (silent use if exists)
- --research flag forces re-research
- --skip-research flag bypasses research entirely
- Researchers commit their output

This enables single-command workflow: /gsd:plan-phase does
research → plan → verify in one orchestrated flow.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-16 10:10:22 -06:00

175 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown

---
name: gsd:research-phase
description: Research how to implement a phase (standalone - usually use /gsd:plan-phase instead)
argument-hint: "[phase]"
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Bash
- Task
---
<objective>
Research how to implement a phase. Spawns gsd-phase-researcher agent with phase context.
**Note:** This is a standalone research command. For most workflows, use `/gsd:plan-phase` which integrates research automatically.
**Use this command when:**
- You want to research without planning yet
- You want to re-research after planning is complete
- You need to investigate before deciding if a phase is feasible
**Orchestrator role:** Parse phase, validate against roadmap, check existing research, gather context, spawn researcher agent, present results.
**Why subagent:** Research burns context fast (WebSearch, Context7 queries, source verification). Fresh 200k context for investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction.
</objective>
<context>
Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
Check for existing research:
```bash
ls .planning/phases/${PHASE}-*/*RESEARCH.md 2>/dev/null
```
</context>
<process>
## 1. Parse and Validate Phase
```bash
grep -A5 "Phase ${PHASE}:" .planning/ROADMAP.md 2>/dev/null
```
**If not found:** Error and exit. **If found:** Extract phase number, name, description.
## 2. Check Existing Research
```bash
ls .planning/phases/${PHASE}-*/RESEARCH.md 2>/dev/null
```
**If exists:** Offer: 1) Update research, 2) View existing, 3) Skip. Wait for response.
**If doesn't exist:** Continue.
## 3. Gather Phase Context
```bash
grep -A20 "Phase ${PHASE}:" .planning/ROADMAP.md
cat .planning/REQUIREMENTS.md 2>/dev/null
cat .planning/phases/${PHASE}-*/${PHASE}-CONTEXT.md 2>/dev/null
grep -A30 "### Decisions Made" .planning/STATE.md 2>/dev/null
```
Present summary with phase description, requirements, prior decisions.
## 4. Spawn gsd-researcher Agent
Research modes: ecosystem (default), feasibility, implementation, comparison.
```markdown
<research_type>
Phase Research — investigating HOW to implement a specific phase well.
</research_type>
<key_insight>
The question is NOT "which library should I use?"
The question is: "What do I not know that I don't know?"
For this phase, discover:
- What's the established architecture pattern?
- What libraries form the standard stack?
- What problems do people commonly hit?
- What's SOTA vs what Claude's training thinks is SOTA?
- What should NOT be hand-rolled?
</key_insight>
<objective>
Research implementation approach for Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
Mode: ecosystem
</objective>
<context>
**Phase description:** {phase_description}
**Requirements:** {requirements_list}
**Prior decisions:** {decisions_if_any}
**Phase context:** {context_md_content}
</context>
<downstream_consumer>
Your RESEARCH.md will be loaded by `/gsd:plan-phase` which uses specific sections:
- `## Standard Stack` → Plans use these libraries
- `## Architecture Patterns` → Task structure follows these
- `## Don't Hand-Roll` → Tasks NEVER build custom solutions for listed problems
- `## Common Pitfalls` → Verification steps check for these
- `## Code Examples` → Task actions reference these patterns
Be prescriptive, not exploratory. "Use X" not "Consider X or Y."
</downstream_consumer>
<quality_gate>
Before declaring complete, verify:
- [ ] All domains investigated (not just some)
- [ ] Negative claims verified with official docs
- [ ] Multiple sources for critical claims
- [ ] Confidence levels assigned honestly
- [ ] Section names match what plan-phase expects
</quality_gate>
<output>
Write to: .planning/phases/{phase}-{slug}/{phase}-RESEARCH.md
</output>
```
```
Task(
prompt=filled_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-phase-researcher",
description="Research Phase {phase}"
)
```
## 5. Handle Agent Return
**`## RESEARCH COMPLETE`:** Display summary, offer: Plan phase, Dig deeper, Review full, Done.
**`## CHECKPOINT REACHED`:** Present to user, get response, spawn continuation.
**`## RESEARCH INCONCLUSIVE`:** Show what was attempted, offer: Add context, Try different mode, Manual.
## 6. Spawn Continuation Agent
```markdown
<objective>
Continue research for Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
</objective>
<prior_state>
Research file: @.planning/phases/{phase}-{slug}/{phase}-RESEARCH.md
</prior_state>
<checkpoint_response>
**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
**Response:** {user_response}
</checkpoint_response>
```
```
Task(
prompt=continuation_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-phase-researcher",
description="Continue research Phase {phase}"
)
```
</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Phase validated against roadmap
- [ ] Existing research checked
- [ ] gsd-phase-researcher spawned with context
- [ ] Checkpoints handled correctly
- [ ] User knows next steps
</success_criteria>