* fix(core): roadmap upgrade rollback must restore .planning regardless of git tracking (#1542) applyMigration rolled back a failed migration with git reset --hard + git clean -fd .planning/phases/. For a commit_docs:false project (.planning gitignored — the default) that restores NOTHING (reset ignores untracked, clean without -x skips ignored), yet it threw 'Migration failed (rolled back to <sha>)' — a false claim leaving .planning half-migrated. git reset --hard is also a whole-repo op. Replace it with a surgical, git-independent rollback: record the exact renames performed and snapshot each file before rewriting it, then on failure reverse the renames and restore the snapshots (deleting files that did not previously exist). Correct whether .planning is tracked or ignored; touches only what it changed. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R88n7Q54bAaVHFkDbbH1yz * chore(changeset): Fixed fragment for #1543 (roadmap upgrade surgical rollback) Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R88n7Q54bAaVHFkDbbH1yz * test(core): update bug-685 execSync count floor after surgical rollback (#1542) The #1542 surgical, git-independent rollback removed the rev-parse/reset/clean git execSync calls from roadmap-upgrade.cts, leaving only the git status precondition. bug-685 asserted calls.length >= 4; lower the floor to >= 1 — the durable guard (every remaining git execSync sets windowsHide:true) is unchanged. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R88n7Q54bAaVHFkDbbH1yz --------- Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.