e4e8a9fcb8
Both sites in plan-review-convergence.md that wrapped gsd-plan-phase in Agent() (initial planning + replan loop) are now bare Skill() calls at depth 0. On Claude Code, a depth-1 Agent has no Agent tool so wrapped plan-phase could never spawn gsd-planner/gsd-plan-checker — the replan loop silently produced no revised plan when HIGHs were found. Running plan-phase inline from the depth-0 orchestrator (which retains the Agent tool) restores the full sub-agent chain. A full audit of all workflow files confirmed these two sites were the only instances of the anti-pattern (no other workflow wraps a spawner orchestrator in Agent() without a RUNTIME carve-out). Added structural guard test bug-936-no-nested-spawner-wrap.test.cjs that dynamically derives the spawner set (workflows containing subagent_type=) and asserts no workflow wraps a spawner inside Agent() without a RUNTIME != claude carve-out — prevents silent regression. Test passes on fixed code, would fail on pre-fix code at the two de-wrapped sites. Also applied two low-severity prose nits flagged in review: - commands/gsd/plan-review-convergence.md: orchestrator role updated to describe inline plan-phase + Agent for review (was generic "spawn Agents") - gsd-core/workflows/plan-review-convergence.md success_criteria: narrowed "Each Agent fully completes" to the review Agent (plan-phase is inline now) Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.