Files
msd-core/get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md
Lex Christopherson e5d4ecc28c feat: parallel-first planning with dependency graphs and checkpoint-resume
- plan-phase.md: dependency-first planning, vertical slices default
- phase-prompt.md: autonomous field, wave structure, frontmatter table
- scope-estimation.md: parallel default, removed "parallel-aware" framing
- plan-format.md: frontmatter docs with depends_on, files_modified, autonomous
- execute-phase.md: checkpoint-resume flow using Task resume parameter

Plans now declare explicit dependencies via frontmatter. Wave assignment
is automatic based on depends_on + files_modified. Checkpoints pause
subagent, return to orchestrator, user responds, orchestrator resumes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-13 16:32:03 -06:00

369 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown

<purpose>
Execute all plans in a phase using wave-based parallel execution. Orchestrator stays lean by delegating plan execution to subagents.
</purpose>
<core_principle>
The orchestrator's job is coordination, not execution. Each subagent loads the full execute-plan context itself. Orchestrator discovers plans, analyzes dependencies, groups into waves, spawns agents, handles checkpoints, collects results.
</core_principle>
<process>
<step name="validate_phase">
Confirm phase exists and has plans:
```bash
PHASE_DIR=$(ls -d .planning/phases/${PHASE_ARG}* 2>/dev/null | head -1)
if [ -z "$PHASE_DIR" ]; then
echo "ERROR: No phase directory matching '${PHASE_ARG}'"
exit 1
fi
PLAN_COUNT=$(ls -1 "$PHASE_DIR"/*-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
if [ "$PLAN_COUNT" -eq 0 ]; then
echo "ERROR: No plans found in $PHASE_DIR"
exit 1
fi
```
Report: "Found {N} plans in {phase_dir}"
</step>
<step name="discover_plans">
List all plans and extract metadata:
```bash
# Get all plans
ls -1 "$PHASE_DIR"/*-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null | sort
# Get completed plans (have SUMMARY.md)
ls -1 "$PHASE_DIR"/*-SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null | sort
```
For each plan, read frontmatter to extract:
- `depends_on: []` - Plan IDs this plan requires
- `files_modified: []` - Files this plan touches
- `autonomous: true/false` - Whether plan has checkpoints
Build plan inventory:
- Plan path
- Plan ID (e.g., "03-01")
- Dependencies
- Files modified
- Autonomous flag
- Completion status (SUMMARY exists = complete)
Skip completed plans. If all complete, report "Phase already executed" and exit.
</step>
<step name="analyze_dependencies">
Build dependency graph from frontmatter:
**Direct dependencies:**
- `depends_on: ["03-01"]` → this plan depends on 03-01
**File conflict dependencies:**
- If two plans modify same file, later plan (by number) depends on earlier
**Build graph:**
```
plan-01: {deps: [], files: [src/user.ts], autonomous: true}
plan-02: {deps: [], files: [src/product.ts], autonomous: true}
plan-03: {deps: ["plan-01"], files: [src/dashboard.tsx], autonomous: false}
plan-04: {deps: ["plan-02"], files: [src/cart.ts], autonomous: true}
plan-05: {deps: ["plan-03", "plan-04"], files: [src/checkout.ts], autonomous: true}
```
</step>
<step name="group_into_waves">
Group plans into execution waves based on dependencies:
**Wave assignment algorithm:**
1. Wave 1: All plans with no dependencies AND autonomous=true
2. Non-autonomous plans with no dependencies: execute after Wave 1, before Wave 2
3. Wave N: Plans whose dependencies are all in earlier waves
**Separate checkpoint plans:**
Plans with `autonomous: false` execute in main context (not parallel subagent) to handle user interaction.
**Example:**
```
Wave 1 (parallel): [plan-01, plan-02]
Checkpoint: [plan-03] - has human-verify, runs in main context
Wave 2 (parallel): [plan-04]
Wave 3: [plan-05]
```
Report wave structure to user:
```
Execution Plan:
Wave 1 (parallel): 03-01, 03-02
Checkpoint: 03-03 (requires user verification)
Wave 2 (parallel): 03-04
Wave 3: 03-05
Total: 5 plans in 3 waves + 1 checkpoint
```
</step>
<step name="execute_waves">
Execute each wave in sequence. Autonomous plans within a wave run in parallel.
**For each wave:**
1. **Spawn all autonomous agents in wave simultaneously:**
Use Task tool with multiple parallel calls. Each agent gets prompt from subagent-task-prompt template:
```
<objective>
Execute plan {plan_number} of phase {phase_number}-{phase_name}.
Commit each task atomically. Create SUMMARY.md. Update STATE.md.
</objective>
<execution_context>
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/execute-plan.md
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/templates/summary.md
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/checkpoints.md
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/tdd.md
</execution_context>
<context>
Plan: @{plan_path}
Project state: @.planning/STATE.md
Config: @.planning/config.json (if exists)
</context>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] All tasks executed
- [ ] Each task committed individually
- [ ] SUMMARY.md created in plan directory
- [ ] STATE.md updated with position and decisions
</success_criteria>
```
2. **Wait for all agents in wave to complete:**
Task tool blocks until each agent finishes. All parallel agents return together.
3. **Collect results from wave:**
For each completed agent:
- Verify SUMMARY.md exists at expected path
- Note any issues reported
- Record completion
4. **Handle failures:**
If any agent in wave fails:
- Report which plan failed and why
- Ask user: "Continue with remaining waves?" or "Stop execution?"
- If continue: proceed to next wave (dependent plans may also fail)
- If stop: exit with partial completion report
5. **Execute checkpoint plans between waves:**
See `<checkpoint_handling>` for details.
6. **Proceed to next wave**
</step>
<step name="checkpoint_handling">
Plans with `autonomous: false` require user interaction.
**Detection:** Check `autonomous` field in frontmatter.
**Execution flow for checkpoint plans:**
1. **Spawn agent for checkpoint plan:**
```
Task(prompt="{subagent-task-prompt}", subagent_type="general-purpose")
```
2. **Agent runs until checkpoint:**
- Executes auto tasks normally
- Reaches checkpoint task (e.g., `type="checkpoint:human-verify"`)
- Agent returns with checkpoint details in its response
3. **Agent return includes:**
- Checkpoint type (human-verify, decision, human-action)
- Checkpoint details (what-built, options, instructions)
- Agent ID for resumption
- Progress so far (tasks completed)
4. **Orchestrator presents checkpoint to user:**
```
## Checkpoint: Visual Verification Required
**Plan:** 03-03 Dashboard Layout
**Progress:** 2/3 tasks complete
**What was built:**
Responsive dashboard with sidebar navigation
**Please verify:**
1. Run: npm run dev
2. Visit: http://localhost:3000/dashboard
3. Desktop (>1024px): Verify sidebar left, content right
4. Mobile (375px): Verify single column layout
Type "approved" to continue, or describe issues to fix.
```
5. **User responds:**
- "approved" → resume agent
- Description of issues → resume agent with feedback
6. **Resume agent:**
```
Task(resume="{agent_id}", prompt="User response: {user_input}")
```
7. **Agent continues from checkpoint:**
- If approved: proceed to next task
- If issues: fix and re-present checkpoint, or ask for clarification
8. **Repeat until plan completes or user stops**
**Checkpoint in parallel context:**
If a plan in a parallel wave has a checkpoint:
- Spawn as normal
- Agent pauses at checkpoint and returns
- Other parallel agents may complete while waiting
- Handle checkpoint, resume agent
- Wait for all agents to finish before next wave
</step>
<step name="aggregate_results">
After all waves complete, aggregate results:
```markdown
## Phase {X}: {Name} Execution Complete
**Waves executed:** {N}
**Plans completed:** {M} of {total}
### Wave Summary
| Wave | Plans | Status |
|------|-------|--------|
| 1 | plan-01, plan-02 | ✓ Complete |
| CP | plan-03 | ✓ Verified |
| 2 | plan-04 | ✓ Complete |
| 3 | plan-05 | ✓ Complete |
### Plan Details
1. **03-01**: [one-liner from SUMMARY.md]
2. **03-02**: [one-liner from SUMMARY.md]
...
### Issues Encountered
[Aggregate from all SUMMARYs, or "None"]
```
</step>
<step name="update_roadmap">
Update ROADMAP.md to reflect phase completion:
```bash
# Mark phase complete
# Update completion date
# Update status
```
Commit roadmap update:
```bash
git add .planning/ROADMAP.md
git commit -m "docs(phase-{X}): complete phase execution"
```
</step>
<step name="offer_next">
Present next steps based on milestone status:
**If more phases remain:**
```
## Next Up
**Phase {X+1}: {Name}** — {Goal}
`/gsd:plan-phase {X+1}`
<sub>`/clear` first for fresh context</sub>
```
**If milestone complete:**
```
MILESTONE COMPLETE!
All {N} phases executed.
`/gsd:complete-milestone`
```
</step>
</process>
<context_efficiency>
**Why this works:**
Orchestrator context usage: ~10-15%
- Read plan frontmatter (small)
- Analyze dependencies (logic, no heavy reads)
- Fill template strings
- Spawn Task calls
- Collect results
Each subagent: Fresh 200k context
- Loads full execute-plan workflow
- Loads templates, references
- Executes plan with full capacity
- Creates SUMMARY, commits
**No polling.** Task tool blocks until completion. No TaskOutput loops.
**No context bleed.** Orchestrator never reads workflow internals. Just paths and results.
</context_efficiency>
<failure_handling>
**Subagent fails mid-plan:**
- SUMMARY.md won't exist
- Orchestrator detects missing SUMMARY
- Reports failure, asks user how to proceed
**Dependency chain breaks:**
- Wave 1 plan fails
- Wave 2 plans depending on it will likely fail
- Orchestrator can still attempt them (user choice)
- Or skip dependent plans entirely
**All agents in wave fail:**
- Something systemic (git issues, permissions, etc.)
- Stop execution
- Report for manual investigation
**Checkpoint fails to resolve:**
- User can't approve or provides repeated issues
- Ask: "Skip this plan?" or "Abort phase execution?"
- Record partial progress in STATE.md
</failure_handling>
<resumption>
**Resuming interrupted execution:**
If phase execution was interrupted (context limit, user exit, error):
1. Run `/gsd:execute-phase {phase}` again
2. discover_plans finds completed SUMMARYs
3. Skips completed plans
4. Resumes from first incomplete plan
5. Continues wave-based execution
**STATE.md tracks:**
- Last completed plan
- Current wave
- Any pending checkpoints
</resumption>