Files
msd-core/.changeset
Tom Boucher f56ffa86ab fix(#3581): derive init.progress's next_phase from roadmap order, not artifact presence (#3603)
* test(#3581): pin init.progress's frontier to roadmap order over stray artifacts

Failing-first regression for #3581: a stray out-of-order phase directory
(a phase-9 UAT evidence file while roadmap phase 8 was pending and
unscaffolded) made init.progress report next_phase 09, skipping Phase 8
and disagreeing with roadmap.analyze. Rows pin the issue shape, the
aligned-tree control, and the all-complete boundary.

* fix(#3581): derive init.progress's next_phase from roadmap order, not artifact presence

The frontier is re-derived from the sorted phase union after the disk and
roadmap loops: the first not-yet-begun, not-roadmap-complete phase wins.
Artifacts still feed status and completion per entry, but a stray
out-of-order directory can no longer drag the frontier past a pending
unscaffolded roadmap phase, and init.progress agrees with roadmap.analyze.

* fix(#3581): frontier = first not-complete phase in roadmap order (resume semantics)

Review-of-own-control refinement: a begun-but-unfinished phase (in_progress,
executed, researched) is the frontier — the next thing to execute is to
resume it — so the frontier predicate is simply 'not complete and not
roadmap-complete', first in the sorted union.

* fix(#3581): preserve the pinned pending-only frontier contract; repair the boundary fixture

Review findings: the resume-semantics refinement broke the suite-pinned
contract that an in-progress phase is currentPhase's lane, not nextPhase's
(tests/init.test.cjs 'multiple phases with mixed statuses') — reverted to
first pending-or-not_started; the control row now pins the pure ordering
property (roadmap-only pending beats a later pending directory); the
boundary fixture gains passing verification reports so disk status reaches
complete under the #3168 disk-strict bar.

* chore(#3581): add changeset fragment

* chore(#3581): backfill changeset pr number

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
2026-08-17 18:24:49 -04:00
..

Changeset Fragments

This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.

Why

Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.

See #2975 for the full rationale.

Adding a fragment

node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
  --type Fixed \
  --pr 1234 \
  --body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"

This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.

Format

---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.

Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.

Opting out

PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.

At release time

Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:

node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty

This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.

Archived fragments

.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.