Records the move from Scala to Go, the compiled-plugin decision, the Płytarium port as the v1 target, and the Go ecosystem research that backs the choice. No code yet.
3.4 KiB
title, date, context
| title | date | context |
|---|---|---|
| Why Go, not Scala | 2026-09-16 | Exploration session that opened the summercms.go repository. Records the language decision so it is not relitigated. |
Why Go, not Scala
Background
SummerCMS started in February 2026 as a Scala 3 rewrite of WinterCMS. The stack was direct-style Scala on JDK 21 virtual threads (Tapir, Ox, Magnum, Jig). Three infrastructure modules shipped as independent sbt projects: summer-compass (config), summer-phrasebook (i18n), summer-bonfire (console). They live in the meta repo under modules/.
The effort stalled before any application ran. It was building Illuminate-shaped infrastructure bottom-up with no real app pulling requirements.
The deciding test
We gave both ecosystems the same task: an OAuth2 server with full OIDC support.
- PHP / WinterCMS. The agent took
league/oauth2-serveras a model, read the existing Golem15 user plugin forks, reused the JWT primitives already in the stack, and produced a plugin. The Płytarium project today runs its own OAuth2 provider on this basis. - Scala. The agent searched and found nothing reusable. It proposed a from-scratch implementation. The proposal was rejected as too large to fund.
The Scala language was never the problem. The ecosystem was. A CMS is mostly glue over solved problems, and glue needs the problems to be solved already.
Why Go passes the same test
The Go ecosystem research (see ../research/go-ecosystem.md) found maintained, widely used libraries for every concern in the Illuminate module map, including the one that failed in Scala: zitadel/oidc is an OpenID-certified provider and client library. Go is closer to PHP's situation than Scala is: many small, boring, well-tested libraries, and several Laravel-shaped frameworks and CMSes to read for patterns (Goravel, PocketBase, GoFrame).
What Go changes
Go is statically compiled, so "drop a plugin folder and it autoloads" does not exist. The decision:
- Primary: compiled plugins. Caddy/xcaddy model.
plugins/is a workspace of Go modules. A generated import list registers them.summer make:pluginscaffolds,summer buildrebuilds, and a watch-rebuild loop in dev makes it feel like WinterCMS. Full type safety, plugins extend each other through ordinary Go interfaces,go testworks. - Later: WASM extension API. A narrow, sandboxed surface for untrusted third-party extensions. Only after the core plugin API is stable. See
../seeds/wasm-extension-api.md. - Rejected: stdlib
plugin(Linux-only, toolchain lockstep, no unload), yaegi (lags Go releases, partial generics), RPC plugins (interface too wide to marshal for model extension).
What carries over from the Scala work
- The module naming scheme in
IDEA_LIB_NAMES.md(backpack, compass, phrasebook, bonfire, ...) can be reused as Go package names. - The design of compass (config layering and plugin namespaces), phrasebook (CLDR plurals, namespaced keys), and bonfire (command registry, rich output) is language-neutral and worth porting.
- The open ORM question from
STACK.md(immutable models vs Eloquent mutation) largely disappears in Go: structs are mutable, and bothentandGORMsupport Eloquent-like flows.
Non-goals
- Not chasing JVM performance. Go's baseline is enough and deploys as one binary.
- Not porting Illuminate module by module. The v1 target app pulls what is needed. See
v1-target-plytarium.md.