- Fix brownfield example to use execute-phase instead of execute-plan
- Remove /gsd:resume-task command (relies on broken Task resume)
- Checkpoint continuation now uses fresh agents, not resume
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
execute-phase with parallel agents is the recommended path.
execute-plan is for single-plan or interactive checkpoint handling.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Resume fails when subagents use parallel tool calls due to Claude Code
serialization bug (consecutive assistant entries with same message ID).
Solution: Subagents return structured checkpoint state, orchestrator
spawns fresh agent with continuation-prompt template instead of resuming.
New files:
- templates/checkpoint-return.md: Structured format with completed tasks table
- templates/continuation-prompt.md: Template for spawning continuation agent
Updated:
- templates/subagent-task-prompt.md: Reference checkpoint-return, remove resume language
- workflows/execute-phase.md: Replace Task(resume=id) with fresh agent spawn
- workflows/execute-plan.md: Update checkpoint_return_for_orchestrator step
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
execute-plan.md command now spawns subagent instead of executing directly:
- Loads only subagent-task-prompt template (~100 lines vs ~2200)
- Subagent loads full execute-plan workflow, summary, checkpoints, tdd
- Handles checkpoint returns with resume flow
- ~80% context reduction for orchestrator
Also updated subagent-task-prompt.md description to clarify it's used by
both execute-phase (parallel) and execute-plan (single) orchestrators.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Scope boundaries are implicit from the roadmap. Asking about them
creates the sensation of scope creep and interrogates the user about
constraints they didn't mention.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Restored context-budget reasoning for why TDD features get dedicated plans:
- TDD requires 2-3 execution cycles consuming 50-60% context
- Test framework setup handled in first TDD plan's RED phase
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- execute-plan.md: Add checkpoint_return_for_orchestrator step
explaining how to return at checkpoints when spawned via Task tool
- subagent-task-prompt.md: Add checkpoint_behavior and completion_format
sections to guide agents on returning for checkpoints
Tested: Task resume works - agent pauses at checkpoint, returns with
details, orchestrator presents to user, resumes with Task(resume=id).
Parallel agents each get unique agent_id for independent resume.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Shows table of all active debug sessions with status/hypothesis/next action
- Reply with number to resume, or describe new issue
- No AskUserQuestion for session selection - inline flow
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Clarified verification instructions for usage.
I was initially trying to get this to work in my PowerShell terminal, but later realized that the /gsd:help command became available inside Claude Code.
Sequential execution is now the recommended default. Parallel
execution is still being refined and may not yield best results.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New features:
- /gsd:execute-phase: run all plans in a phase with parallel background agents
- /gsd:status: monitor background agent status from parallel execution
- Parallelization-aware planning with depends_on and files_modified frontmatter
- Automatic dependency analysis and wave-based execution
Configuration options in .planning/config.json:
- max_concurrent_agents (default: 3)
- skip_checkpoints (default: true)
- min_plans_for_parallel (default: 2)
Inspired by PR #43 from @davesienkowski - thank you for the design work!
Remove confusing `parallelizable` boolean field. It was redundant -
execute-phase already computes parallelizability from `depends_on`
and file conflicts.
Changes:
- Remove `parallelizable: true|false` from plan frontmatter
- Rename `files_exclusive` to `files_modified` (clearer intent)
- Simplify execute-phase dependency detection logic
- Update phase-prompt template and plan-phase workflow
Parallelization is now fully automatic based on:
- `depends_on: []` (empty = independent)
- `files_modified: [...]` (no overlap = can parallelize)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Routes to batch execution when 2+ plans exist, with execute-plan
as alternative for interactive mode.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Context isolation is the primary goal, not parallelization.
Even sequential plans spawn separate subagents for fresh 200k context.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add parallel-aware plan example with vertical slice pattern
- Add sequential plan example with explicit dependencies
- Document key differences between parallel and sequential plans
Tasks completed: 2/2
- Update analyze_plan_dependencies to read frontmatter fields
- Update categorization to use frontmatter parallelizable field
SUMMARY: .planning/phases/11-parallel-aware-planning/11-03-SUMMARY.md
- Update categorization table to show frontmatter-aware criteria
- Add categorization priority documentation
- Update calculate_wave() to check frontmatter depends_on first
- Handle parallelizable: false as implicit Wave 2+ assignment
- Fall back to inferred requires only when no frontmatter
- Add [frontmatter] annotation in wave output for plans using new fields
- Add PLAN_PARALLELIZABLE, PLAN_DEPENDS_ON, PLAN_FILES_EXCLUSIVE arrays
- Check for parallelizable, depends_on, files_exclusive in plan frontmatter
- Use frontmatter values directly when present
- Fall back to inference logic for old plans without frontmatter
- Document dependency detection priority
- Include parallelizable, depends_on, files_exclusive in frontmatter
- Rules for parallelizable field determination
- Parallel-aware context section guidance
- Avoid reflexive SUMMARY references when parallel
- File ownership analysis per task group
- Detect unnecessary inter-plan dependencies
- Restructure for vertical slices when beneficial
- Mark plans with parallelization frontmatter values
