3146ff36aa
* fix(#3132): realign spec/plan/ui-phase workflow prose from retired covered/backstop-as-status to resolved+verification The edge-probe resolution model splits status (resolved|dismissed|unresolved) from verification (explicit|backstop). The workflow prose in three files still used the pre-re-cut covered/backstop-as-status vocabulary that validateResolution rejects. Swept all three prose surfaces: - spec-phase.md: Step 5.5 resolution options, --auto mode + log line, comment, Step 6 row list - plan-phase.md: lift rule (L778/L780), comments (L564/L706), quality gate (L826-827) - ui-phase.md: resolution loop (L391), --auto mode (L405-409), write-back format (L415) Added regression test in edge-probe-spec-phase-contract.test.cjs asserting the retired vocab is absent and resolved+verification is used instead. * chore(#3132): add changeset + emitted-drift ack for workflow vocab realignment * fix(#3132): update planner contract tests for resolved+verification vocabulary RR-02 and RR-03 tests asserted the old covered/backstop-as-status vocab. Updated to match the realigned prose (resolved edge → must_haves). * fix(#3132): fix specless-probe-fallback test assertion + merge duplicate ack Test assertion was too strict (expected auto-resolved + verification:explicit on same line). Split into two independent assertions. Merged plan-phase.md ack into existing #2658 fragment to resolve duplicate-path rule violation. * fix(#3132): use bare filenames in ack keys (size map keys are bare, not full paths) * fix(#3132): amend existing acks instead of duplicating — remove plan-phase from #2658, spec-phase from #3132, append #3132 reason to #0000 and #2650 * chore(#3132): backfill changeset PR number 3138 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
13 KiB
13 KiB